HPV-vaccination for the prevention of cervical cancer in Austria: a model based long-term prognosis of cancer epidemiology

AimCervical cancer incidence and mortality have decreased for the last 20 years in Austria; however, they remain relatively high in comparison to other European countries. Screening quality has been suboptimal. In this paper we aim to predict the population-wide long-term effects on cervical cancer morbidity and mortality after introducing an HPV vaccination for 12-year-old girls (and boys) in addition to current screening in comparison with screening only.MethodsHealth effects are predicted by a dynamic transmission model that was previously applied in the UK and the Norwegian contexts and validated for Austria. Outcomes analyzed are restricted to cervical cancer mortality and morbidity, which are predicted until 2060 assuming a coverage rate between 65% and 85%, a duration of protection between 10 years and lifelong, and a vaccine efficacy between 80% and 100% in the base case and best case, respectively. Additionally, implications for cancer epidemiology until 2088 are estimated.ResultsCompared to screening only, screening plus vaccination of 12-year-old girls (and boys) would result in a median reduction of 10% (15%) fewer new cancer cases and 13% (20%) fewer cervical cancer deaths under best case assumptions over 52 years in the overall female population. In 2060, female population-based incidence and mortality would decrease by 27% and 43%, respectively, when vaccinating girls only and by 37% and 45% when additionally vaccinating boys. After 2060, a continuous further decrease in incidence and mortality can be expected with a maximum of minus 43% and 53%, respectively, in 2088 when vaccinating girls only.ConclusionAlthough a constant decrease in cervical cancer incidence and mortality is to be expected after introducing a population-wide HPV vaccination program in Austria, the reduction predicted by this model is lower than expected from clinical trials. This is due to several factors, such as low coverage rate and the long time horizon required for generating the maximum benefit of the vaccination in the overall population. In the context of limited resources, for further reducing cervical cancer in Austria, HPV vaccination programs need to be weighed against other public health alternatives such as improving screening quality.

[1]  Sue J Goldie,et al.  Health and economic implications of HPV vaccination in the United States. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  P. De Wals,et al.  The potential cost-effectiveness of prophylactic human papillomavirus vaccines in Canada. , 2007, Vaccine.

[3]  S Gallivan,et al.  Estimating the long-term impact of a prophylactic human papillomavirus 16/18 vaccine on the burden of cervical cancer in the UK , 2006, British Journal of Cancer.

[4]  J Dillner,et al.  Strategies for the introduction of human papillomavirus vaccination: modelling the optimum age- and sex-specific pattern of vaccination in Finland , 2007, British Journal of Cancer.

[5]  R. Burk,et al.  Natural history of cervicovaginal papillomavirus infection in young women , 1998 .

[6]  Sue J Goldie,et al.  Chapter 21: Modelling the impact of HPV vaccines on cervical cancer and screening programmes. , 2006, Vaccine.

[7]  Erik J. Dasbach,et al.  Model for Assessing Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Strategies , 2007, Emerging infectious diseases.

[8]  K. Jansen,et al.  Detection of HPV in Norwegian cervical biopsy specimens with type-specific PCR and reverse line blot assays. , 2006, Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology.

[9]  C. Wild,et al.  Rational Vaccination Policies - decision support. Review of International Literature for "Rational" Vaccination Policies , 2008 .

[10]  Geoffrey P Garnett,et al.  Role of herd immunity in determining the effect of vaccines against sexually transmitted disease. , 2005, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[11]  G. Sanders,et al.  Evaluating Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Programs , 2004, Emerging infectious diseases.

[12]  Obstetric HPV vaccination for the prevention of cervical cancer. , 2010, Nursing for Women s Health.

[13]  Mark Jit,et al.  Economic evaluation of human papillomavirus vaccination in the United Kingdom , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  J. Ferlay,et al.  Globocan 2000 : cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide , 2001 .

[15]  Gillian D. Sanders,et al.  Cost Effectiveness of a Potential Vaccine for Human papillomavirus , 2003, Emerging infectious diseases.

[16]  Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of HPV 16, 18 vaccination in Brazil. , 2007, Vaccine.

[17]  James P. Hughes,et al.  The Theoretical Population-Level Impact of a Prophylactic Human Papilloma Virus Vaccine , 2002, Epidemiology.

[18]  E. Dasbach,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in Mexico: a transmission dynamic model-based evaluation. , 2007, Vaccine.

[19]  Shalini L Kulasingam,et al.  Adding a quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine to the UK cervical cancer screening programme: A cost-effectiveness analysis , 2008, Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E.

[20]  P. Mathevet,et al.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of the introduction of a quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine in France , 2008, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[21]  Milton C Weinstein,et al.  Projected clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness of a human papillomavirus 16/18 vaccine. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[22]  A. Muñoz,et al.  Incidence, duration, and determinants of cervical human papillomavirus infection in a cohort of Colombian women with normal cytological results. , 2004, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[23]  Xavier Castellsagué,et al.  Against which human papillomavirus types shall we vaccinate and screen? the international perspective , 2004, International journal of cancer.

[24]  Philippe Vielh,et al.  Cross sectional study of conventional cervical smear, monolayer cytology, and human papillomavirus DNA testing for cervical cancer screening , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  L Beardsley,et al.  Natural history of cervicovaginal papillomavirus infection in young women. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  Uwe Siebert,et al.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of human papillomavirus-vaccination programs to prevent cervical cancer in Austria. , 2009, Vaccine.

[27]  T. Waldhoer,et al.  Prevalence of self-reported cervical cancer screening and impact on cervical cancer mortality in Austria. , 1999, Wiener klinische Wochenschrift.

[28]  EJ Dasbach,et al.  The epidemiological and economic impact of a quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine (6/11/16/18) in the UK , 2008, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[29]  Karen M Kuntz,et al.  Multiparameter calibration of a natural history model of cervical cancer. , 2007, American journal of epidemiology.

[30]  Shalini L Kulasingam,et al.  Potential health and economic impact of adding a human papillomavirus vaccine to screening programs. , 2003, JAMA.