Effects of Methanol on Wettability of the Non-Smooth Surface on Butterfly Wing

The contact angles of distilled water and methanol solution on the wings of butterflies were determined by a visual contact angle measuring system. The scale structures of the wings were observed using scanning electron microscopy, The influence of the scale micro- and ultra-structure on the wettability was investigated. Results show that the contact angle of distilled water on the wing surfaces varies from 134.0° to 159.2°. High hydrophobicity is found in six species with contact angles greater than 150°. The wing surfaces of some species are not only hydrophobic but also resist the wetting by methanol solution with 55% concentration. Only two species in Parnassius can not resist the wetting because the micro-structure (spindle-like shape) and ultra-structure (pinnule-like shape) of the wing scales are remarkably different from that of other species. The concentration of methanol solution for the occurrence of spreading/wetting on the wing surfaces of different species varies from 70% to 95%. After wetting by methanol solution for 10 min, the distilled water contact angle on the wing surface increases by 0.8°–2.1°, showing the promotion of capacity against wetting by distilled water.

[1]  B. Bhushan,et al.  Wetting of rough three-dimensional superhydrophobic surfaces , 2006 .

[2]  Bharat Bhushan,et al.  Micro- and nanoscale characterization of hydrophobic and hydrophilic leaf surfaces , 2006 .

[3]  Bharat Bhushan,et al.  Roughness optimization for biomimetic superhydrophobic surfaces , 2005 .

[4]  Wilhelm Barthlott,et al.  Wettability and Contaminability of Insect Wings as a Function of Their Surface Sculptures , 1996 .

[5]  J. Lahann,et al.  A Reversibly Switching Surface , 2003, Science.

[6]  H. Erbil,et al.  Transformation of a Simple Plastic into a Superhydrophobic Surface , 2003, Science.

[7]  Wilhelm Barthlott,et al.  Characterization and Distribution of Water-repellent, Self-cleaning Plant Surfaces , 1997 .

[8]  R. N. Wenzel.  RESISTANCE OF SOLID SURFACES TO WETTING BY WATER , 1936 .

[9]  W. Barthlott,et al.  Quantitative assessment to the structural basis of water repellency in natural and technical surfaces. , 2003, Journal of experimental botany.

[10]  Yong‐Fei Zheng,et al.  Fluid activity during exhumation of deep-subducted continental plate , 2004 .

[11]  B. Bhushan,et al.  Surface characterization and adhesion and friction properties of hydrophobic leaf surfaces. , 2006, Ultramicroscopy.

[12]  Markus Oles,et al.  Lotus‐Effect® – surfaces , 2002 .

[13]  Bharat Bhushan,et al.  Nanotribology And Nanomechanics- An Introduction , 2008 .

[14]  Yan Fang,et al.  Hydrophobicity mechanism of non-smooth pattern on surface of butterfly wing , 2007 .

[15]  B. Bhushan,et al.  Stochastic model for metastable wetting of roughness-induced superhydrophobic surfaces , 2006 .

[16]  Dan Wu,et al.  Superhydrophobicity from microstructured surface , 2004 .

[17]  Reinhard Lipowsky,et al.  Wetting morphologies at microstructured surfaces. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Jin Zhai,et al.  Super-hydrophobic surfaces: From natural to artificial , 2002 .

[19]  C. Io.  Classification and identification of Chinese butterflies. , 1998 .

[20]  W. Barthlott,et al.  Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces , 1997, Planta.

[22]  C. Brinker,et al.  Superhydrophobicity: Drying transition of confined water , 2006, Nature.

[23]  B. Bhushan,et al.  Introduction to Tribology , 2002 .