User Tracking for Access Control with Bluetooth Low Energy

The Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) of Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) is a popular means for indoor user localization and tracking as it reflects the transmitter-receiver distance and is readily available in all current smartphones. Since fading, shadowing and antenna patterns cause severe RSSI fluctuations, many RSSI-based localization systems use fingerprinting instead of parameter estimation based on a channel model (e.g. trilateration from distance estimates). Fingerprinting however requires a large effort for training data acquisition and frequent updates in dynamic environments. In this paper we focus on wireless access control with BLE. We demonstrate that a practical implementation of such a tracking system can meet the typical demands of generic access control problems with low- complexity parameter estimation techniques, namely trilateration and optional Kalman filtering. Thereby, satisfactory accuracy is enabled by diversity (averaging in space, time and frequency), calibration and appropriate observation space modeling. We find that including the RSSI directly in the observation space renders trilateration obsolete, which reduces complexity even further.

[1]  Thomas Zemen,et al.  Ray-Tracing Based Fingerprinting for Indoor Localization , 2018, 2018 IEEE 19th International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC).

[2]  Jun-Ho Oh,et al.  Low-cost indoor positioning system using BLE (bluetooth low energy) based sensor fusion with constrained extended Kalman Filter , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO).

[3]  Wei Zhang,et al.  DeepPositioning: Intelligent Fusion of Pervasive Magnetic Field and WiFi Fingerprinting for Smartphone Indoor Localization via Deep Learning , 2017, 2017 16th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA).

[4]  Ladislav Polak,et al.  BLE device indoor localization based on RSS fingerprinting mapped by propagation modes , 2017, 2017 27th International Conference Radioelektronika (RADIOELEKTRONIKA).

[5]  Holger Claussen,et al.  Wireless RSSI fingerprinting localization , 2017, Signal Process..

[6]  Hisashi Kobayashi,et al.  On relation among time delay and signal strength based geolocation methods , 2003, GLOBECOM '03. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37489).

[7]  Armin Wittneben,et al.  On the Crucial Impact of Antennas and Diversity on BLE RSSI-Based Indoor Localization , 2019, 2019 IEEE 89th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2019-Spring).

[8]  Wolfgang Rosenstiel,et al.  PBIL PDR for scalable Bluetooth Indoor Localization , 2009, 2009 Third International Conference on Next Generation Mobile Applications, Services and Technologies.

[9]  Ismail Guvenc,et al.  Enhancements to RSS Based Indoor Tracking Systems Using Kalman Filters , 2003 .

[10]  Martin Randles,et al.  Optimized indoor positioning for static mode smart devices using BLE , 2017, 2017 IEEE 28th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC).

[11]  Pau Closas,et al.  Received signal strength–based indoor localization using a robust interacting multiple model–extended Kalman filter algorithm , 2017, Int. J. Distributed Sens. Networks.

[12]  Gu-Min Jeong,et al.  Step-Detection and Adaptive Step-Length Estimation for Pedestrian Dead-Reckoning at Various Walking Speeds Using a Smartphone , 2016, Sensors.

[13]  Dong Liang,et al.  Indoor localization algorithm based on iterative grid clustering and AP scoring , 2015, 2015 IEEE 26th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC).