Low-signal limit of X-ray single particle diffractive imaging.

An outstanding question in X-ray single particle imaging experiments has been the feasibility of imaging sub 10-nm-sized biomolecules under realistic experimental conditions where very few photons are expected to be measured in a single snapshot and instrument background may be significant relative to particle scattering. While analyses of simulated data have shown that the determination of an average image should be feasible using Bayesian methods such as the EMC algorithm, this has yet to be demonstrated using experimental data containing realistic non-isotropic instrument background, sample variability and other experimental factors. In this work, we show that the orientation and phase retrieval steps work at photon counts diluted to the signal levels one expects from smaller molecules or with weaker pulses, using data from experimental measurements of 60-nm PR772 viruses. Even when the signal is reduced to a fraction as little as 1/256, the virus electron density determined using ab initio phasing is of almost the same quality as the high-signal data. However, we are still limited by the total number of patterns collected, which may soon be mitigated by the advent of high repetition-rate sources like the European XFEL and LCLS-II.

[1]  A. Barty Single molecule imaging using X-ray free electron lasers. , 2016, Current opinion in structural biology.

[2]  Carl Nettelblad,et al.  Correlations in Scattered X-Ray Laser Pulses Reveal Nanoscale Structural Features of Viruses. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[3]  Danna Zhou,et al.  d. , 1934, Microbial pathogenesis.

[4]  R. Santra,et al.  The linac coherent light source single particle imaging road map , 2015, Structural dynamics.

[5]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.

[7]  M. van Heel,et al.  Fourier shell correlation threshold criteria. , 2005, Journal of structural biology.

[8]  F. Maia The Coherent X-ray Imaging Data Bank , 2012, Nature Methods.

[9]  J R Fienup,et al.  Reconstruction of an object from the modulus of its Fourier transform. , 1978, Optics letters.

[10]  J. Kirz,et al.  Biological imaging by soft x-ray diffraction microscopy , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[12]  Veit Elser Phase retrieval by iterated projections. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[13]  Series 7 , 1980 .

[14]  Veit Elser,et al.  Reconstruction algorithm for single-particle diffraction imaging experiments. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  S. Marchesini,et al.  Phase Aberrations in Diffraction Microscopy , 2005, physics/0510033.

[16]  Jean-Michel Claverie,et al.  Three-dimensional reconstruction of the giant mimivirus particle with an x-ray free-electron laser. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[17]  Andrew V. Martin,et al.  Optimal mapping of x-ray laser diffraction patterns into three dimensions using routing algorithms. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.