Instrumentation for Contrast Echocardiography

A number of new imaging methods have been developed specifically for use with ultrasound contrast agents. These methods rely on the peculiar behavior of microbubbles in an ultrasound field. At low incident acoustic pressures (reflected by the mechanical index, MI) microbubbles emit harmonics. These can be detected using harmonic or pulse inversion imaging. At higher MI, bubbles are disrupted, emitting a strong, nonlinear echo. Harmonic power Doppler methods are able to detect this echo, offering the most sensitive method for the detection of microbubble at the perfusion level. Although the first images of myocardial perfusion were made using this disruption method, it requires intermittent imaging with interframe intervals of up to 6 heart beats. Pulse inversion Doppler imaging is a newer method that is able to detect the nonlinear component of bubble echoes at a very low MI, thereby making possible real‐time myocardial perfusion imaging. An understanding of the behavior of bubbles during an imaging examination is an essential prerequisite to its success in clinical practice.

[1]  R. Apfel,et al.  Gauging the likelihood of cavitation from short-pulse, low-duty cycle diagnostic ultrasound. , 1991, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[2]  P. Burns,et al.  Nonlinear imaging. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[3]  T. Porter,et al.  Transient myocardial contrast after initial exposure to diagnostic ultrasound pressures with minute doses of intravenously injected microbubbles. Demonstration and potential mechanisms. , 1995, Circulation.

[4]  N. Jong,et al.  Physics of microbubble scattering , 1997 .

[5]  T. Porter,et al.  Improved myocardial contrast with second harmonic transient ultrasound response imaging in humans using intravenous perfluorocarbon-exposed sonicated dextrose albumin. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  C. Chin,et al.  Predicting acoustic response of a microbubble population for contrast imaging , 1997, 1997 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.97CH36118).

[7]  R. M. Thomas,et al.  Ultrasound contrast agents nucleate inertial cavitation in vitro. , 1995, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[8]  V. Uhlendorf,et al.  Nonlinear acoustical response of coated microbubbles in diagnostic ultrasound , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium.

[9]  B. Lüderitz,et al.  Real‐Time Contrast Echo Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion at Low Emission Power , 1999, Echocardiography.

[10]  井上 良紀,et al.  流体力学用語集 非線形音響学(Nonlinear acoustics) , 1995 .

[11]  Volkmar Uhlendorf,et al.  Imaging of Spatial Distribution and Flow of Microbubbles Using Nonlinear Acoustic Properties , 1996 .

[12]  Ronald A. Roy,et al.  In vitro detection of cavitation induced by a diagnostic ultrasound system , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[13]  Peter N. Burns,et al.  Harmonic power mode Doppler using microbubble contrast agents: an improved method for small vessel flow imaging , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium.

[14]  J. Seward,et al.  Second harmonic imaging of an intravenously administered echocardiographic contrast agent: Visualization of coronary arteries and measurement of coronary blood flow. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  R. Schlief,et al.  The Effects of the Microbubble Suspension SH U 454 (Echovist®) on Ultrasound‐Induced Cell Lysis In a Rotating Tube Exposure System , 1991, Echocardiography.

[16]  M. Plesset The Dynamics of Cavitation Bubbles , 1949 .

[17]  C. Francis,et al.  Effect of acoustic cavitation on platelets in the presence of an echo-contrast agent. , 1998, Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology.

[18]  S. Kaul,et al.  Myocardial contrast echocardiography in coronary artery disease: potential applications using venous injections of contrast. , 1995, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  D. Miller,et al.  Ultrasonically induced hemolysis at high cell and gas body concentrations in a thin-disc exposure chamber. , 1997, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[20]  K. Shung,et al.  On the application of ultrasonic contrast agents for blood flowmetry and assessment of cardiac perfusion. , 1990, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[21]  P. Dayton,et al.  Optical and acoustical observations of the effects of ultrasound on contrast agents , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[22]  C. Chin,et al.  Pulse inversion Doppler: a new method for detecting nonlinear echoes from microbubble contrast agents , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[23]  Harald Becher,et al.  Handbook of Contrast Echocardiography , 2000, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[24]  E. Carstensen,et al.  Lung damage from exposure to pulsed ultrasound. , 1990, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[25]  Morton W. Miller,et al.  A review of in vitro bioeffects of inertial ultrasonic cavitation from a mechanistic perspective. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[26]  R. Lindsay On the Pressure Developed in a Liquid During the Collapse of a Spherical Cavity (1917) , 1970 .

[27]  K J Parker,et al.  Contrast agents in diagnostic ultrasound. , 1989, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.