Non-cooperative uplink power control in cellular radio systems

This paper presents uplink power control in cellular radio systems from an economic point of view. A utility function is defined for each mobile user, which reflects the user's preference regarding the carrier-to-interference ratio (CIR) and the transmitter power. We observe that, on one hand, mobile users prefer to transmit at a lower power for a fixed CIR. On the other hand, for a given transmitter power, users prefer to obtain a better CIR. Based on this observation, we make two fundamental assumptions about the utility function. We formulate the uplink power control problem as a non-cooperative N-person game. Under the two assumptions that we make about the utility function, there exists a Nash equilibrium. To show the generality of the framework, we study one special case by defining the utility as a linear function. This model encompasses many of the widely studied power control problems. A more general case is also studied by defining utility as an exponential function. This paper establishes a general economic-based framework for studying resource management in wireless networks and points out new research directions.

[1]  Roy D. Yates,et al.  A Framework for Uplink Power Control in Cellular Radio Systems , 1995, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[2]  H. Meyerhoff Power balancing in multibeam satellites , 1974 .

[3]  David J. Goodman,et al.  Distributed power control in cellular radio systems , 1994, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[4]  J. Aubin Mathematical methods of game and economic theory , 1979 .

[5]  Ezhan Karasan,et al.  GoS-based pricing and resource allocation for multimedia broadband networks , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM '96. Conference on Computer Communications.

[6]  Debasis Mitra,et al.  An Asynchronous Distributed Algorithm for Power Control in Cellular Radio Systems , 1994 .

[7]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. , 1945 .

[8]  Jens Zander,et al.  Constrained power control in cellular radio systems , 1994, Proceedings of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC).

[9]  R.W. Nettleton,et al.  Power control for a spread spectrum cellular mobile radio system , 1983, 33rd IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference.

[10]  K. Arrow,et al.  Aspects of the theory of risk-bearing , 1966 .

[11]  Jens Zander Distributed Cochannel Control in Cellular Radio Systems Interference , 1992 .

[12]  Jens Zander,et al.  Transmitter Power Control for Co-Channel Interference Management in Cellular Radio Systems - An Overview and some Recent Results , 1993 .

[13]  M. Sakamoto,et al.  Reduction of cochannel interference in cellular systems by intra-zone channel reassignment and adaptive transmitter power control , 1988, 38th IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference.

[14]  G. Debreu Theory of value : an axiomatic analysis of economic equilibrium , 1960 .

[15]  J. Nash Equilibrium Points in N-Person Games. , 1950, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Jens Zander,et al.  Performance of optimum transmitter power control in cellular radio systems , 1992 .

[17]  Kenneth J. Arrow,et al.  Aspects of the Theory of Risk Bearing--Yrjo Jahnsson Lectures , 1969 .

[18]  Gerard J. Foschini,et al.  A simple distributed autonomous power control algorithm and its convergence , 1993 .

[19]  Roy D. Yates,et al.  Integrated power control and base station assignment , 1995 .

[20]  Jens Zander,et al.  Distributed cochannel interference control in cellular radio systems , 1992 .

[21]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[22]  Jens Zander,et al.  Centralized power control in cellular radio systems , 1993 .