Classical Prandtl-Ishlinskii modeling and inverse multiplicative structure to compensate hysteresis in piezoactuators

This paper presents a new approach to compensate the static hysteresis in smart material based actuators that is modeled by the Prandtl-Ishlinskii approach. The proposed approach allows a simplicity and ease of implementation. Furthermore, as soon as the direct model is identified and obtained, the compensator is directly derived. The experimental results on piezoactuators show its efficiency and prove its interest for the precise control of microactuators without the use of sensors. In particular, we experimentally show that the hysteresis of the studied actuator which was initially 23% was reduced to less than 2.5% for the considered working frequency.

[1]  Philippe Lutz,et al.  Quadrilateral Modelling and Robust Control of a Nonlinear Piezoelectric Cantilever , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[2]  Santosh Devasia,et al.  Inverse-feedforward of charge-controlled piezopositioners , 2008 .

[3]  A. Fleming,et al.  A grounded-load charge amplifier for reducing hysteresis in piezoelectric tube scanners , 2005 .

[4]  A. Dubra,et al.  Preisach classical and nonlinear modeling of hysteresis in piezoceramic deformable mirrors. , 2005, Optics express.

[5]  D. Croft,et al.  Creep, Hysteresis, and Vibration Compensation for Piezoactuators: Atomic Force Microscopy Application , 2001 .

[6]  M. Krasnosel’skiǐ,et al.  Systems with Hysteresis , 1989 .

[7]  K. Kuhnen,et al.  Inverse feedforward controller for complex hysteretic nonlinearities in smart-material systems , 2001 .

[8]  P. Lutz,et al.  Development, Modeling, and Control of a Micro-/Nanopositioning 2-DOF Stick–Slip Device , 2009, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[9]  Gerber,et al.  Atomic Force Microscope , 2020, Definitions.

[10]  Wei Tech Ang,et al.  Feedforward Controller With Inverse Rate-Dependent Model for Piezoelectric Actuators in Trajectory-Tracking Applications , 2007, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[11]  Micky Rakotondrabe,et al.  Development and Force/Position Control of a New Hybrid Thermo-Piezoelectric MicroGripper Dedicated to Micromanipulation Tasks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[12]  Santosh Devasia,et al.  Hysteresis, Creep, and Vibration Compensation for Piezoactuators: Feedback and Feedforward Control 1 , 2002 .

[13]  Saeid Bashash,et al.  A Polynomial-Based Linear Mapping Strategy for Feedforward Compensation of Hysteresis in Piezoelectric Actuators , 2008 .

[14]  Philippe Lutz,et al.  Complete Open Loop Control of Hysteretic, Creeped, and Oscillating Piezoelectric Cantilevers , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[15]  Aristides A. G. Requicha,et al.  Compensation of Scanner Creep and Hysteresis for AFM Nanomanipulation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[16]  Micky Rakotondrabe,et al.  Bouc–Wen Modeling and Inverse Multiplicative Structure to Compensate Hysteresis Nonlinearity in Piezoelectric Actuators , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[17]  J.-M. Breguet,et al.  A smart microrobot on chip: design, identification and modeling , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM 2003).

[18]  A. Bergander,et al.  Mobile cm3-microrobots with tools for nanoscale imaging and micromanipulation , 2004 .