Technological Forecasting & Social Change Locked into Copenhagen pledges — Implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goals

This paper provides an overview of the AMPERE modeling comparison project with focus on the implications of near-term policies for the costs and attainability of long-term climate objectives. Nine modeling teams participated in the project to explore the consequences of global emissions following the proposed policy stringency of the national pledges from the Copenhagen Accord and Cancun Agreements to 2030. Specific features compared to earlier assessments are the explicit consideration of near-term 2030 emission targets as well as the systematic sensitivity analysis for the availability and potential of mitigation technologies. Our estimates show that a 2030 mitigation effort comparable to the pledges would result in a further "lock-in" of the energy system into fossil fuels and thus impede the required energy transformation to reach low greenhouse-gas stabilization levels (450 ppm CO2e). Major implications include significant increases in mitigation costs, increased risk that low stabilization targets become unattainable, and reduced chances of staying below the proposed temperature change target of 2 °C in case of overshoot. With respect to technologies, we find that following the pledge pathways to 2030 would narrow policy choices, and increases the risks that some currently optional technologies, such as carbon capture and storage (CCS) or the large-scale deployment of bioenergy, will become "a must" by 2030.

[1]  Danièle Revel,et al.  IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation , 2011 .

[2]  L. Clarke,et al.  International climate policy architectures: Overview of the EMF 22 International Scenarios , 2009 .

[3]  Tom Kober,et al.  A CROSS-MODEL COMPARISON OF GLOBAL LONG-TERM TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION UNDER A 2°C CLIMATE CHANGE CONTROL TARGET , 2013 .

[4]  Socrates Kypreos,et al.  The Economics of Low Stabilization: Model Comparison of Mitigation Strategies and Costs , 2010 .

[5]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  Technology Dynamics and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Mitigation: A Cost Assessment , 2000 .

[6]  Tom M. L. Wigley,et al.  Emulating atmosphere-ocean and carbon cycle models with a simpler model, MAGICC6 – Part 2: Applications , 2011 .

[7]  G. Luderer,et al.  Is atmospheric carbon dioxide removal a game changer for climate change mitigation? , 2013, Climatic Change.

[8]  T. Wigley,et al.  Emulating coupled atmosphere-ocean and carbon cycle models with a simpler model, MAGICC6 - Part 1: Model description and calibration , 2011 .

[9]  Nebojsa Nakicenovic,et al.  Sustainable energy for all , 2012 .

[10]  Sebastiaan Deetman,et al.  The role of negative CO2 emissions for reaching 2 °C—insights from integrated assessment modelling , 2013, Climatic Change.

[11]  D. Vuuren,et al.  Mid- and long-term climate projections for fragmented and delayed-action scenarios , 2015 .

[12]  J. Eom,et al.  Technological Forecasting & Social Change Carbon lock-in through capital stock inertia associated with weak near-term climate policies , 2014 .

[13]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[14]  Charlie Wilson,et al.  Diagnostic indicators for integrated assessment models of climate policy , 2015 .

[15]  Kenichi Wada,et al.  Assessments of GHG emission reduction scenarios of different levels and different short-term pledges through macro- and sectoral decomposition analyses , 2015 .

[16]  Detlef P. van Vuuren,et al.  Bio-Energy Use and Low Stabilization Scenarios , 2010 .

[17]  David S. Lee,et al.  Historical (1850–2000) gridded anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of reactive gases and aerosols: methodology and application , 2010 .

[18]  K. Lindgren,et al.  The feasibility of low CO2 concentration targets and the role of bio-energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) , 2010 .

[19]  M. Elzen,et al.  Analysing the Emission Gap Between Pledged Emission Reductions Under the Cancun Agreements and the 2 Degree-C Climate Target , 2012 .

[20]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  Impacts of considering electric sector variability and reliability in the MESSAGE model , 2013 .

[21]  N. Meinshausen,et al.  Warming caused by cumulative carbon emissions towards the trillionth tonne , 2009, Nature.

[22]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  WHAT DOES THE 2 C TARGET IMPLY FOR A GLOBAL CLIMATE AGREEMENT IN 2020? THE LIMITS STUDY ON DURBAN PLATFORM SCENARIOS , 2013 .

[23]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  Evolution of anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of air pollutants at global and regional scales during the 1980–2010 period , 2011 .

[24]  D. McCollum,et al.  Probabilistic cost estimates for climate change mitigation , 2013, Nature.

[25]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  Emission pathways consistent with a 2[thinsp][deg]C global temperature limit , 2011 .

[26]  D. McCollum,et al.  Stranded on a low-carbon planet: Implications of climate policy for the phase-out of coal-based power plants , 2015 .

[27]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  The relationship between short-term emissions and long-term concentration targets , 2011 .

[28]  K. Calvin,et al.  The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300 , 2011 .

[29]  Alban Kitous,et al.  Mitigation strategies and energy technology learning: an assessment with the POLES model , 2015 .

[30]  Massimo Tavoni,et al.  Nuclear Versus Coal plus CCS: a Comparison of Two Competitive Base-Load Climate Control Options , 2009 .

[31]  Elmar Kriegler,et al.  Getting from here to there – energy technology transformation pathways in the EMF27 scenarios , 2014, Climatic Change.

[32]  Niclas Mattsson,et al.  Meeting global temperature targets—the role of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage , 2013 .

[33]  Malte Meinshausen,et al.  Copenhagen Accord Pledges imply higher costs for staying below 2°C warming , 2012, Climatic Change.

[34]  Michael Grubb,et al.  The economics of changing course : Implications of adaptability and inertia for optimal climate policy , 1995 .

[35]  K. Calvin,et al.  LIMITS Special Issue on Durban Platform scenarios Energy investments under climate policy: a comparison of global models , 2013 .

[36]  W. Arthur,et al.  INCREASING RETURNS AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS , 1989 .

[37]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  Chapter 17 - Energy Pathways for Sustainable Development , 2012 .

[38]  Bob van der Zwaan,et al.  The role of nuclear power in mitigating emissions from electricity generation , 2013 .

[39]  Gregg Marland,et al.  Estimates of global, regional, and national annual CO{sub 2} emissions from fossil-fuel burning, hydraulic cement production, and gas flaring: 1950--1992 , 1995 .

[40]  H. Damon Matthews,et al.  The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions , 2009, Nature.

[41]  Jan Christoph Steckel,et al.  The value of technology and of its evolution towards a low carbon economy , 2012, Climatic Change.

[42]  M. Grubb,et al.  Influence of socioeconomic inertia and uncertainty on optimal CO2-emission abatement , 1997, Nature.

[43]  Jan Christoph Steckel,et al.  The economics of decarbonizing the energy system—results and insights from the RECIPE model intercomparison , 2012, Climatic Change.

[44]  P. Jones,et al.  Uncertainty estimates in regional and global observed temperature changes: A new data set from 1850 , 2006 .

[45]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  Implications of delayed participation and technology failure for the feasibility, costs, and likelihood of staying below temperature targets—Greenhouse gas mitigation scenarios for the 21st century , 2009 .

[46]  M. Hamdi-Chérif,et al.  Energy efficiency policies and the timing of action: An assessment of climate mitigation costs , 2015 .

[47]  Robert J. Brecha,et al.  Economics of nuclear power and climate change mitigation policies , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  N. Meinshausen,et al.  Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 °C , 2009, Nature.

[49]  Kenichi Wada,et al.  Making or breaking climate targets: : The AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy , 2015 .

[50]  J. Edmonds,et al.  Implications of Limiting CO2 Concentrations for Land Use and Energy , 2009, Science.

[51]  Joeri Rogelj,et al.  Global warming under old and new scenarios using IPCC climate sensitivity range estimates , 2012 .

[52]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  The impact of near-term climate policy choices on technology and emission transition pathways , 2015 .

[53]  Nils Markusson,et al.  Last chance for carbon capture and storage , 2013 .

[54]  Politically Feasible Emissions Targets to Attain 460 ppm CO2 Concentrations , 2012, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[55]  D. Vuuren,et al.  The Emissions Gap Report 2012 , 2012 .

[56]  Massimo Tavoni,et al.  Modeling meets science and technology: an introduction to a special issue on negative emissions , 2013, Climatic Change.

[57]  Brian C. O'Neill,et al.  2020 emissions levels required to limit warming to below 2 °C , 2013 .

[58]  Nebojsa Nakicenovic,et al.  Assessment of emissions scenarios revisited , 2006 .

[59]  Peter J. Gleckler,et al.  Improved estimates of upper-ocean warming and multi-decadal sea-level rise , 2008, Nature.

[60]  Michel G.J. den Elzen,et al.  The emissions gap between the Copenhagen pledges and the 2 °C climate goal: Options for closing and risks that could widen the gap , 2011 .

[61]  John P. Weyant,et al.  The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies , 2014, Climatic Change.

[62]  D. North.  Competing Technologies , Increasing Returns , and Lock-In by Historical Events , 1994 .

[63]  Joeri Rogelj,et al.  Analysis of the Copenhagen Accord pledges and its global climatic impacts—a snapshot of dissonant ambitions , 2010 .

[64]  R. Schnur,et al.  Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis: Results from the C , 2006 .

[65]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE MAJOR ECONOMIES' EFFORT IN THE DURBAN PLATFORM SCENARIOS , 2013 .

[66]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  Emission pathways consistent with a 2 ◦ C global temperature limit , 2011 .

[67]  J. Rogelj,et al.  National GHG emissions reduction pledges and 2°C: comparison of studies , 2012 .

[68]  Stephan Schmid,et al.  Energy [R]evolution 2008—a sustainable world energy perspective , 2009 .

[69]  Elmar Kriegler,et al.  Economic mitigation challenges: how further delay closes the door for achieving climate targets , 2013 .

[70]  Miss A.O. Penney.  (b) , 1974, The New Yale Book of Quotations.