TSECfire v1.0: Quantifying Wildfire Drivers and Predictability in Boreal Peatlands Using a Two-Step Error-Correcting Machine Learning Framework

. Wildfires are becoming an increasing challenge to the sustainability of boreal peatland (BP) ecosystems and can alter the stability of boreal carbon storage. However, a quantitative understanding of natural and anthropogenic influences on the changes in BP fires remains elusive. Here, we quantified the predictability of BP fires and their primary controlling factors from 1997 to 2016 using a two-step correcting machine learning (ML) framework that combines multiple ML 15 classifiers, regression models, and an error-correcting technique. We found that (1) the adopted oversampling algorithm effectively addressed the unbalanced data and improved the recall rate by 26.88%–48.62% when using multiple datasets, and the error correcting technique tackled the overestimation of fire sizes during fire seasons, (2) non-parametric models outperformed parametric models in predicting fire occurrences, and the machine learning model of Random Forest performed the best with the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve ranging from 0.83 to 0.93 across multiple 20 fire data sets, and (3) four sets of factor-control simulations consistently indicated the dominant role of temperature, air dryness, and climate extreme (i.e., frost) for boreal peatland fires, overriding the effects of precipitation, wind speed, and human activities. Our findings demonstrate the efficiency and accuracy of ML techniques in BP fire prediction and disentangle the primary factors determining BP fires, which are critical for predicting future fire risks under

[1]  M. Cochrane,et al.  A Field Study of Tropical Peat Fire Behaviour and Associated Carbon Emissions , 2022, Fire.

[2]  M. Kummu,et al.  Identifying Key Drivers of Peatland Fires Across Kalimantan's Ex‐Mega Rice Project Using Machine Learning , 2021, Earth and Space Science.

[3]  G. Rein,et al.  Smouldering wildfires in peatlands, forests and the arctic: Challenges and perspectives , 2021, Current opinion in environmental science & health.

[4]  G. Rein,et al.  Spontaneous ignition of soils: a multi-step reaction scheme to simulate self-heating ignition of smouldering peat fires , 2021 .

[5]  Nor Azizah Che Azmi,et al.  Carbon emissions from the peat fire problem—a review , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[6]  J. Gao,et al.  Data-Driven Wildfire Risk Prediction in Northern California , 2021, Atmosphere.

[7]  D. Rosadi,et al.  Prediction of Forest Fire Occurrence in Peatlands using Machine Learning Approaches , 2020, 2020 3rd International Seminar on Research of Information Technology and Intelligent Systems (ISRITI).

[8]  V. Brovkin,et al.  Expert assessment of future vulnerability of the global peatland carbon sink , 2020, Nature Climate Change.

[9]  N. Madani,et al.  Global Monthly GPP from an Improved Light Use Efficiency Model, 1982-2016 , 2020 .

[10]  Sally S.-C. Wang,et al.  Quantifying the effects of environmental factors on wildfire burned area in the south central US using integrated machine learning techniques , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[11]  You Zhou,et al.  Prediction of Wildfire-induced Trips of Overhead Transmission Line based on data mining , 2020, 2020 IEEE International Conference on High Voltage Engineering and Application (ICHVE).

[12]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Large stocks of peatland carbon and nitrogen are vulnerable to permafrost thaw , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  F. Hoffman,et al.  Quantifying the drivers and predictability of seasonal changes in African fire , 2020, Nature Communications.

[14]  T. A. Black,et al.  Increasing contribution of peatlands to boreal evapotranspiration in a warming climate , 2020, Nature Climate Change.

[15]  B. Fu,et al.  Permafrost thawing puts the frozen carbon at risk over the Tibetan Plateau , 2020, Science Advances.

[16]  Xinyan Huang,et al.  Can rain suppress smoldering peat fire? , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[17]  P. Jones,et al.  Version 4 of the CRU TS monthly high-resolution gridded multivariate climate dataset , 2020, Scientific Data.

[18]  G. Schaepman‐Strub,et al.  Extensive fires in southeastern Siberian permafrost linked to preceding Arctic Oscillation , 2020, Science Advances.

[19]  Padhraic Smyth,et al.  Machine learning to predict final fire size at the time of ignition , 2019, International journal of wildland fire.

[20]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Increased atmospheric vapor pressure deficit reduces global vegetation growth , 2019, Science Advances.

[21]  Nukman,et al.  Self-Ignition Temperature of Peat , 2019, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

[22]  Younes Oulad Sayad,et al.  Predictive modeling of wildfires: A new dataset and machine learning approach , 2019, Fire Safety Journal.

[23]  Wouter Dorigo,et al.  Emergent relationships with respect to burned area in global satellite observations and fire-enabled vegetation models , 2019, Biogeosciences.

[24]  D. Roy,et al.  The Collection 6 MODIS burned area mapping algorithm and product , 2018, Remote sensing of environment.

[25]  M. Turetsky,et al.  Controls on boreal peat combustion and resulting emissions of carbon and mercury , 2018 .

[26]  K. Devito,et al.  Seasonally frozen soil modifies patterns of boreal peatland wildfire vulnerability , 2018 .

[27]  R. Rothermel A Mathematical Model for Predicting Fire Spread in Wildland Fuels , 2017 .

[28]  G. Rein,et al.  Self-ignition of natural fuels: Can wildfires of carbon-rich soil start by self-heating? , 2017 .

[29]  R. Kolka,et al.  Gaseous mercury fluxes in peatlands and the potential influence of climate change , 2017 .

[30]  E. Stehfest,et al.  Anthropogenic land use estimates for the Holocene – HYDE 3.2 , 2016 .

[31]  P. Blanken,et al.  The increasing importance of atmospheric demand for ecosystem water and carbon fluxes , 2016 .

[32]  Stephen Sitch,et al.  The Fire Modeling Intercomparison Project (FireMIP), phase 1: Experimental and analytical protocols with detailed model descriptions , 2016 .

[33]  N. Verhoest,et al.  GLEAM v3: satellite-based land evaporation and root-zone soil moisture , 2016 .

[34]  Philippe Ciais,et al.  The status and challenge of global fire modelling , 2016 .

[35]  S. Page,et al.  In the line of fire: the peatlands of Southeast Asia , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  Ali Behrangi,et al.  Status of high‐latitude precipitation estimates from observations and reanalyses , 2016, Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres : JGR.

[37]  Michael Brauer,et al.  Critical Review of Health Impacts of Wildfire Smoke Exposure , 2016, Environmental health perspectives.

[38]  Guido Grosse,et al.  Recent Arctic tundra fire initiates widespread thermokarst development , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[39]  Compton J. Tucker,et al.  A Non-Stationary 1981-2012 AVHRR NDVI3g Time Series , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[40]  Roland Hiederer,et al.  Global soil carbon: understanding and managing the largest terrestrial carbon pool , 2014 .

[41]  Martin E. Alexander,et al.  Fire on Earth: An Introduction , 2014 .

[42]  José M. Gutiérrez,et al.  Assessing the predictability of fire occurrence and area burned across phytoclimatic regions in Spain , 2014 .

[43]  F. Hu,et al.  Recent burning of boreal forests exceeds fire regime limits of the past 10,000 years , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  J. Randerson,et al.  Analysis of daily, monthly, and annual burned area using the fourth‐generation global fire emissions database (GFED4) , 2013 .

[45]  J. Randerson,et al.  Global burned area and biomass burning emissions from small fires , 2012 .

[46]  D. S. Ward,et al.  Quantifying the role of fire in the Earth system – Part 1: Improved global fire modeling in the Community Earth System Model (CESM1) , 2012 .

[47]  M. A. H. Farquad,et al.  Preprocessing unbalanced data using support vector machine , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[48]  J. Fuhrer,et al.  Peatland subsidence and carbon loss from drained temperate fens , 2011 .

[49]  R. Schincariol,et al.  Effects of freezing on soil temperature, freezing front propagation and moisture redistribution in peat: laboratory investigations , 2011 .

[50]  T. Holmes,et al.  Global land-surface evaporation estimated from satellite-based observations , 2010 .

[51]  J. Loisel,et al.  Global peatland dynamics since the Last Glacial Maximum , 2010 .

[52]  A. Grishin,et al.  On physical and mathematical modeling of the initiation and propagation of peat fires , 2009 .

[53]  J. Price,et al.  The effects of water table draw‐down (as a surrogate for climate change) on the hydrology of a fen peatland, Canada , 2006 .

[54]  M. Flannigan,et al.  Future Area Burned in Canada , 2005 .

[55]  John E. Walsh,et al.  IMPACTS OF LARGE‐SCALE ATMOSPHERIC–OCEAN VARIABILITY ON ALASKAN FIRE SEASON SEVERITY , 2005 .

[56]  P. Goovaerts,et al.  Uncertainty in estimating carbon emissions from boreal forest fires , 2004 .

[57]  E. Bååth,et al.  Use of Phospholipid Fatty Acids To Detect Previous Self-Heating Events in Stored Peat , 2003, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[58]  D. Roy,et al.  Burned area mapping using multi-temporal moderate spatial resolution data—a bi-directional reflectance model-based expectation approach , 2002 .

[59]  J. Price,et al.  Importance of shrinkage and compression in determining water storage changes in peat: the case of a mined peatland , 1999 .

[60]  E. Gorham Northern Peatlands: Role in the Carbon Cycle and Probable Responses to Climatic Warming. , 1991, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[61]  H. Dijk,et al.  Effect of drying and freezing on certain physical properties of peat , 1965 .

[62]  Emilio Chuvieco,et al.  A spatio-temporal active-fire clustering approach for global burned area mapping at 250 m from MODIS data , 2020 .

[63]  G. Rein,et al.  Upward-and-downward spread of smoldering peat fire , 2019, Proceedings of the Combustion Institute.

[64]  Sergi Costafreda-Aumedes,et al.  Human-caused fire occurrence modelling in perspective: a review , 2017 .

[65]  Aarti Singh,et al.  PREDICTING BURNED AREAS OF FOREST FIRES : AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPROACH , 2017 .

[66]  S. Page,et al.  Global vulnerability of peatlands to fire and carbon loss , 2015 .

[67]  M. Bell,et al.  A systematic review of the physical health impacts from non-occupational exposure to wildfire smoke. , 2015, Environmental research.

[68]  F. Li,et al.  Quantifying the role of fire in the Earth system – Part 1 : Improved global fire modeling in the Community Earth System Model ( CESM 1 ) , 2012 .

[69]  W. Hao,et al.  Chapter 4 Chemical Composition of Wildland Fire Emissions , 2008 .

[70]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  The global carbon cycle: integrating humans, climate and the natural world. , 2004 .

[71]  T. Ohlemiller Modeling of smoldering combustion propagation , 1985 .

[72]  R. Burgan,et al.  BEHAVE : Fire Behavior Prediction and Fuel Modeling System -- FUEL Subsystem , 1984 .