SENSORY CONSONANCE: An ERP Study

THE AIM OF THIS SERIES OF experiments was to determine whether consonant and dissonant chords elicit similar or different electrophysiological effects out of a musical context and whether these effects are similar or different for musicians and nonmusicians. To this end, w e recorded t he e vent-related b rain potentials (ERPs) elicited by the different intervals of the chromatic scale that were classified into three categories: perfect consonances, imperfect consonances, and dissonances. Participants were to decide, on a six-point scale, whether the intervals evoked pleasant or unpleasant feelings. To test the hypothesis that the perception of dissonance results from the superposition of the partials of close frequencies (Helmholtz, 1877), two notes were either played together (harmonic intervals) or successively (melodic intervals). Since, in this latter case, the two notes are played at different points in time, the perception of roughness, if any, should be weaker than for harmonic intervals. In line with Helmholtz9s hypothesis, results showed larger differences for harmonic than for melodic intervals, which were mainly found on the N1-P2 complex for musicians, on the N2 component for nonmusicians, and on a later negative component for both musicians and nonmusicians. However, these results also point to the influence of expertise and cultural factors, since different results were obtained when ERPs were averaged as a function of music theory and according to the participants9 responses.

[1]  R. Plomp,et al.  Tonal consonance and critical bandwidth. , 1965, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  P. Daston,et al.  Musical consonance as musical preference: a cross-cultural study. , 1968, The Journal of general psychology.

[3]  F. Martin,et al.  The relationship between complex music stimuli and the late components of the event-related potential. , 1992 .

[4]  Josef P. Rauschecker,et al.  Auditory cortical plasticity: a comparison with other sensory systems , 1999, Trends in Neurosciences.

[5]  Gerald J. Balzano,et al.  The role of chroma and scalestep in the recognition of musical intervals in and out of context. , 1982 .

[6]  W. Ritter,et al.  The scalp topography of potentials in auditory and visual discrimination tasks. , 1977, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  T. F. Maher A rigorous test of the proposition that musical intervals have different psychological effects. , 1980, The American journal of psychology.

[8]  M. Besson,et al.  Different Brain Mechanisms Mediate Sensitivity to Sensory Consonance and Harmonic Context: Evidence from Auditory Event-Related Brain Potentials , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  H G Vaughan,et al.  Event-related potential correlates of two stages of information processing in physical and semantic discrimination tasks. , 1983, Psychophysiology.

[10]  B. Ross,et al.  COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE AND NEUROPSYCHOLOGY: Timbre-specific enhancement of auditory cortical representations in musicians , 2022 .

[11]  Norman M. Weinberger,et al.  Physiological Memory in Primary Auditory Cortex: Characteristics and Mechanisms , 1998, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[12]  J. Staiger,et al.  Increased corpus callosum size in musicians , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  B Lütkenhöner,et al.  Magnetoencephalographic studies of functional organization and plasticity of the human auditory cortex. , 2000, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[14]  D. Berlyne,et al.  Verbal and Exploratory Responses to Melodic Musical Intervals , 1982 .

[15]  D Friedman,et al.  A brain event related to the making of a sensory discrimination. , 1979, Science.

[16]  F. Macar,et al.  An event-related potential analysis of incongruity in music and other non-linguistic contexts. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[17]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Emotional responses to pleasant and unpleasant music correlate with activity in paralimbic brain regions , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  Marc Leman,et al.  Music and Schema Theory : Cognitive Foundations of Systematic Musicology , 1995 .

[19]  Aniruddh D. Patel Syntactic Processing in Language and Music: Different Cognitive Operations, Similar Neural Resources? , 1998 .

[20]  Petr Janata,et al.  ERP Measures Assay the Degree of Expectancy Violation of Harmonic Contexts in Music , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  Marco Costa,et al.  Psychological Connotations of Harmonic Musical Intervals , 2000 .

[22]  M J Watkins,et al.  The modality effect and echoic persistence. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[23]  A. Friederici,et al.  Brain Indices of Music Processing: Nonmusicians are Musical , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  Roni Y. Granot,et al.  Cognitive Meanings of Musical Elements as Disclosed by Event-Related Potential (ERP) and Verbal Experiments , 1993 .

[25]  James Tenney,et al.  A history of consonance and dissonance , 1988 .

[26]  Richard Parncutt,et al.  Listening to music in the real world? A critical discussion of Marc Leman's (1995) music and schema theory: Cognitive foundations of systematic musicology * , 1998 .

[27]  M. Besson,et al.  AN EVENT-RELATED POTENTIAL (ERP) STUDY OF MUSICAL EXPECTANCY : COMPARISON OF MUSICIANS WITH NONMUSICIANS , 1995 .

[28]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  An auditory analogue of the sperling partial report procedure: Evidence for brief auditory storage , 1972 .