Consistent large-eddy simulation of a temporal mixing layer laden with evaporating drops. Part 1. Direct numerical simulation, formulation and a priori analysis

Large-eddy simulation (LES) models are presented and evaluated on a database obtained from direct numerical simulation (DNS) of a three-dimensional temporal mixing layer with evaporating drops. The gas-phase equations are written in an Eulerian frame for two perfect gas species (carrier gas and vapour emanating from the drops), while the liquid-phase equations are written in a Lagrangian frame. The effect of drop evaporation on the gas phase is considered through mass, momentum and energy source terms. The DNS database consists of transitional states attained by layers with different initial Reynolds numbers and initial liquid-phase mass loadings. Budgets of the LES equations at the transitional states show that, for the mass loadings considered, the filtered source terms (FSTs) are smaller than the resolved inviscid terms and some subgrid scale (SGS) terms, but larger than the resolved viscous stress, heat flux and mass flux terms. The irreversible entropy production (i.e. the dissipation) expression for a two-phase flow with phase change is derived, showing that the dissipation contains contributions due to viscous stresses, heat and species-mass fluxes, and source terms. For both the DNS and filtered flow fields at transition, the two leading contributions are found to be the dissipation due to the energy source term and that due to the chemical potential of the mass source. Therefore, the modelling effort is focused on both the SGS fluxes and the FSTs in the LES equations. The FST models considered are applicable to LES in which the grid is coarser than the DNS grid and, consistently, ‘computational’ drops represent the DNS physical drops. Because the unfiltered flow field is required for the computation of the source terms, but would not be available in LES, it was approximated using the filtered flow field or the filtered flow field augmented by corrections based on the SGS variances. All of the FST models were found to overestimate DNS-field FSTs, with the relative error of modelling the unfiltered flow field compared to the error of using computational drops showing a complex dependence on filter width and number of computational drops. For modelling the SGS fluxes and (where possible) SGS variances, constant-coefficient Smagorinsky, gradient and scale-similarity models were assessed on the DNS database, and calibrated coefficients were statistically equivalent when computed on single-phase or two-phase flows. The gradient and scale-similarity models showed excellent correlation with the SGS quantities. An a posteriori study is proposed to evaluate the impact of the studied models on the flow-field development, so as to definitively assess their suitability for LES with evaporating drops.

[1]  T. Kajishima,et al.  Large-eddy simulation of turbulent gas–particle flow in a vertical channel: effect of considering inter-particle collisions , 2001, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[2]  C. Meneveau,et al.  On the properties of similarity subgrid-scale models as deduced from measurements in a turbulent jet , 1994, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[3]  U. Piomelli,et al.  Subgrid-Scale Models for Compressible Large-Eddy Simulations , 2000, Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics.

[4]  K. Squires,et al.  On the prediction of gas–solid flows with two-way coupling using large eddy simulation , 2000 .

[5]  J. Bellan,et al.  Direct Numerical Simulation and Subgrid Analysis of a Transitional Droplet Laden Mixing Layer , 2000 .

[6]  C. D. Pruett,et al.  A Priori Analyses of Three Subgrid-Scale Models for One-Parameter Families of Filters , 2000 .

[7]  C. Fureby,et al.  On subgrid scale modeling in large eddy simulations of compressible fluid flow , 1996 .

[8]  F. Mashayek Direct numerical simulations of evaporating droplet dispersion in forced low Mach number turbulence , 1998 .

[9]  F. Spellman Combustion Theory , 2020 .

[10]  O. Simonin,et al.  Large eddy simulation applied to the modelling of particulate transport coefficients in turbulent two-phase flows , 1991 .

[11]  Maurice Bryson,et al.  Probability, Statistics, and Reliability for Engineers , 1997, Technometrics.

[12]  J. Sochacki,et al.  On Taylor-series expansions of residual stress , 2001 .

[13]  M. Sokolov,et al.  Distribution of Mass, Velocity, and Intensity of Turbulence in a Two-Phase Turbulent Jet , 1971 .

[14]  Doyle Knight,et al.  Large Eddy Simulations Using an Unstructured Grid Compressible Navier - Stokes Algorithm , 2000 .

[15]  Farzad Mashayek,et al.  Droplet–turbulence interactions in low-Mach-number homogeneous shear two-phase flows , 1998, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[16]  Clayton T. Crowe,et al.  Particle mixing in free shear flows , 1988 .

[17]  Josette Bellan,et al.  A Priori Subgrid Analysis of Temporal Mixing Layers with Evaporating Droplets , 2000 .

[18]  J. Bellan,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of a confined three-dimensional gas mixing layer with one evaporating hydrocarbon-droplet-laden stream , 1999, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[19]  T. Poinsot Boundary conditions for direct simulations of compressible viscous flows , 1992 .

[20]  Bernardus J. Geurts,et al.  A priori tests of large eddy simulation of the compressible plane mixing layer , 1995 .

[21]  A. Yoshizawa Statistical theory for compressible turbulent shear flows, with the application to subgrid modeling , 1986 .

[22]  Said Elghobashi,et al.  Two-component LDA measurement in a two-phase turbulent jet , 1983 .

[23]  R. Moser,et al.  Mixing transition and the cascade to small scales in a plane mixing layer , 1991 .

[24]  Koichi Hishida,et al.  Effect of laden solid particles on the turbulent flow structure of a round free jet , 1987 .

[25]  Yoshinobu Morikawa,et al.  Measurement of an axisymmetric jet laden with coarse particles , 1988 .

[26]  J. Ferziger,et al.  Evaluation of subgrid-scale models using an accurately simulated turbulent flow , 1979, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[27]  Farzad Mashayek,et al.  Particle dispersion in forced isotropic low-Mach-number turbulence , 1999 .

[28]  K. Squires,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of turbulence modulation by particles in isotropic turbulence , 1998, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[29]  Yannis Hardalupas,et al.  Velocity and particle-flux characteristics of turbulent particle-laden jets , 1989, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[30]  Luc Vervisch,et al.  Spray vaporization in nonpremixed turbulent combustion modeling: a single droplet model , 2000 .

[31]  W. Uijttewaal,et al.  Particle dispersion and deposition in direct numerical and large eddy simulations of vertical pipe flows , 1996 .

[32]  G.,et al.  TOWARD THE LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION OF COMPRESSIBLE TURBULENT FLOWS , 2022 .

[33]  J. Ferziger,et al.  Improved subgrid-scale models for large-eddy simulation , 1980 .

[34]  N. Abuaf,et al.  Velocity measurements in a two-phase turbulent jet , 1974 .

[35]  C. F. Curtiss,et al.  Molecular Theory Of Gases And Liquids , 1954 .

[36]  M. Carpenter,et al.  Several new numerical methods for compressible shear-layer simulations , 1994 .

[37]  F. Lockwood,et al.  Velocity measurements in a particle laden turbulent free jet , 1981 .

[38]  N. Mansour Large-eddy simulation of a turbulent mixing layer , 1978 .

[39]  Josette Bellan,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of a transitional temporal mixing layer laden with multicomponent-fuel evaporating drops using continuous thermodynamics , 2004 .