Estimating Heterogeneous EBA and Economic Screening Rule Choice Models

Consumer choice in surveys and in the marketplace reflects a complex process of screening and evaluating choice alternatives. Behavioral and economic models of choice processes are difficult to estimate when using stated and revealed preferences because the underlying process is latent. This paper introduces Bayesian methods for estimating two behavioral models that eliminate alternatives using specific attribute levels. The elimination by aspects theory postulates a sequential elimination of alternatives by attribute levels until a single one, the chosen alternative, remains. In the economic screening rule model, respondents screen out alternatives with certain attribute levels and then choose from the remaining alternatives, using a compensatory function of all the attributes. The economic screening rule model gives an economic justification as to why certain attributes are used to screen alternatives. A commercial conjoint study is used to illustrate the methods and assess their performance. In this data set, the economic screening rule model outperforms the EBA and other standard choice models and provides comparable results to an equivalent conjunctive screening rule model.

[1]  Peter S. Fader,et al.  An Elimination by Aspects Model of Consumer Response to Promotion Calibrated on UPC Scanner Data , 1990 .

[2]  John W. Payne,et al.  The adaptive decision maker: Name index , 1993 .

[3]  John W. Payne,et al.  Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis☆ , 1976 .

[4]  R. Kohli,et al.  Probabilistic Subset-Conjunctive Models for Heterogeneous Consumers , 2005 .

[5]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Constructive Consumer Choice Processes , 1998 .

[6]  David J. Curry,et al.  Prediction in Marketing Using the Support Vector Machine , 2005 .

[7]  K. Srinivasan,et al.  Price Uncertainty and Consumer Search: A Structural Model of Consideration Set Formation , 2003 .

[8]  Stephane Hess,et al.  On the use of a Modified Latin Hypercube Sampling (MLHS) method in the estimation of a Mixed Logit Model for vehicle choice , 2006 .

[9]  André de Palma,et al.  Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation , 1995 .

[10]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[11]  A. Tversky.  Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. , 1972 .

[12]  C. Leake.  Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation , 1995 .

[13]  Ajay K. Manrai,et al.  Elimination-By-Cutoffs , 1989 .

[14]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. , 1984 .

[15]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  Bayesian Statistics and Marketing , 2005 .

[16]  Steven M. Shugan.  The Cost Of Thinking , 1980 .

[17]  Greg M. Allenby,et al.  Multivariate Analysis of Multiple Response Data , 2003 .

[18]  John Roberts,et al.  Development and Testing of a Model of Consideration Set Composition , 1991 .

[19]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[20]  Sanjoy Ghose,et al.  Elimination by Dimensions , 1992 .

[21]  Christopher M. Miller,et al.  Useful mathematical relationships embedded in Tversky's elimination by aspects model , 2003 .

[22]  M. Keane,et al.  Decision-Making Under Uncertainty: Capturing Dynamic Brand Choice Processes in Turbulent Consumer Goods Markets , 1996 .

[23]  John T. Gourville,et al.  Overchoice and Assortment Type: When and Why Variety Backfires , 2005 .

[24]  J. A. Rotondo.  Technical Note—Price as an Aspect of Choice in EBA , 1986 .

[25]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  An Evaluation Cost Model of Consideration Sets , 1990 .

[26]  Greg M. Allenby,et al.  A Choice Model with Conjunctive, Disjunctive, and Compensatory Screening Rules , 2004 .

[27]  G. Maddala.  Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics: Introduction , 1983 .

[28]  M. Newton.  Approximate Bayesian-inference With the Weighted Likelihood Bootstrap , 1994 .