Benford’s Distribution in Complex Networks

Many collections of numbers do not have a uniform distribution of the leading digit, but conform to a very particular pattern known as Benford’s distribution. This distribution has been found in numerous areas such as accounting data, voting registers, census data, and even in natural phenomena. Recently it has been reported that Benford’s law applies to online social networks. Here we introduce a set of rigorous tests for adherence to Benford’s law and apply it to verification of this claim, extending the scope of the experiment to various complex networks and to artificial networks created by several popular generative models. Our findings are that neither for real nor for artificial networks there is sufficient evidence for common conformity of network structural properties with Benford’s distribution. We find very weak evidence suggesting that three measures, degree centrality, betweenness centrality and local clustering coefficient, could adhere to Benford’s law for scalefree networks but only for very narrow range of their parameters.

[1]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  {SNAP Datasets}: {Stanford} Large Network Dataset Collection , 2014 .

[2]  Steven J. Miller,et al.  Data Diagnostics Using Second‐Order Tests of Benford's Law , 2009 .

[3]  Simon Newcomb,et al.  Note on the Frequency of Use of the Different Digits in Natural Numbers , 1881 .

[4]  Meeyoung Cha,et al.  Social bootstrapping: how pinterest and last.fm social communities benefit by borrowing links from facebook , 2014, WWW.

[5]  Béla Bollobás,et al.  Mathematical results on scale‐free random graphs , 2005 .

[6]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[7]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[8]  E. Ley.  On the Peculiar Distribution of the U.S. Stock Indexes' Digits , 1996 .

[9]  Patricia Pepple Williamson,et al.  Detecting Fraud in Data Sets Using Benford's Law , 2004 .

[10]  R. A. Raimi.  The First Digit Problem , 1976 .

[11]  B. Bollobás.  The evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[12]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Explaining the uneven distribution of numbers in nature: the laws of Benford and Zipf , 2001 .

[13]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[14]  T. Hill.  A Statistical Derivation of the Significant-Digit Law , 1995 .

[15]  Roger S. Pinkham,et al.  On the Distribution of First Significant Digits , 1961 .

[16]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Graphs over time: densification laws, shrinking diameters and possible explanations , 2005, KDD '05.

[17]  E. Kirchler,et al.  Price developments after a nominal shock: Benford's Law and psychological pricing after the euro introduction , 2005 .

[18]  D. Giles.  Benford's law and naturally occurring prices in certain ebaY auctions , 2007 .

[19]  T. Hill.  The Significant-Digit Phenomenon , 1995 .

[20]  George G. Judge,et al.  Detecting Problems in Survey Data Using Benford’s Law , 2007, The Journal of Human Resources.

[21]  Walter R. Mebane,et al.  Election Forensics: Vote Counts and Benford's Law , 2006 .

[22]  Jennifer Golbeck,et al.  Benford’s Law Applies to Online Social Networks , 2015, PloS one.

[23]  Peter C. Ordeshook,et al.  Benford's Law and the Detection of Election Fraud , 2011, Political Analysis.

[24]  Peter W. Becker,et al.  Patterns in Listings of Failure-Rate & MTTF Values and Listings of Other Data , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[25]  Stefan Bornholdt,et al.  Handbook of Graphs and Networks: From the Genome to the Internet , 2003 .

[26]  Anton K. Formann,et al.  The Newcomb-Benford Law in Its Relation to Some Common Distributions , 2010, PloS one.

[27]  M. Barthelemy.  Betweenness centrality in large complex networks , 2003, cond-mat/0309436.

[28]  J. C. Alexander.  Remarks on the Use of Benford's Law , 2009 .

[29]  Cindy Durtschi,et al.  The effective use of Benford's Law to assist in detecting fraud in accounting data , 2004 .

[30]  Steven J. Miller,et al.  Benford’s Law Applied to Hydrology Data—Results and Relevance to Other Geophysical Data , 2007 .

[31]  M. Nigrini.  Benford's law : applications for forensic accounting, auditing, and fraud detection , 2012 .

[32]  P. Erdos,et al.  On the evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[33]  David J. Hand,et al.  Statistical fraud detection: A review , 2002 .