The form of the auto-shaped response with food or water reinforcers.

The relation between the form of auto-shaped responses to the lighting of a key and the consummatory responses of pecking grain and drinking water was examined in pigeons. Responses on the key were analyzed by means of high-speed photography, recordings of the force of contact, and judges' ratings of response-form based on film and videotape recordings. The first experiment showed that food-deprived birds presented grain as a reinforcer responded on the key with a grain-pecking movement, while water-deprived birds presented water as a reinforcer responded with drinking-like movements. The second and third experiments showed that the resemblance between auto-shaped and consummatory responses does not require the dominance of the deprivational state appropriate to the reinforcer. Changing the dominant state of deprivation did not immediately change the form of the key response, and in subjects simultaneously deprived of food and water, the form of response depended on the reinforcer. In the fourth and fifth experiments, subjects simultaneously deprived of food and water received one stimulus signalling food and another signalling water in a random series. In most subjects, the response to each stimulus resembled the consummatory response to the particular reinforcer that was signalled by the stimulus. This result demonstrates the role of association between a stimulus and a reinforcer in producing a resemblance of the auto-shaped response to the consummatory response.

[1]  I. P. Pavlov,et al.  A brief outline of the higher nervous activity. , 1930 .

[2]  I. Pavlov An Attempt at a Physiological Interpretation of Obsessional Neurosis and Paranoia , 1934 .

[3]  K. Zener The significance of behavior accompanying conditioned salivary secretion for theories of the conditioned response. , 1937 .

[4]  K. Breland,et al.  The misbehavior of organisms. , 1961 .

[5]  R F HEFFERLINE,et al.  Simple transducers to detect or record operant amplitude. , 1961, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[6]  R. Patten,et al.  The Sheffield omission training procedure applied to the conditioning of the licking response in rats , 1967 .

[7]  R. Rescorla Probability of shock in the presence and absence of CS in fear conditioning. , 1968, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[8]  P. L. Brown,et al.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[9]  M. Sidman,et al.  A demonstration of auto-shaping with monkeys. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[10]  D. R. Williams,et al.  Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[11]  L. Squier Autoshaping key responses with fish , 1969 .

[12]  Howard Rachlin Autoshaping of key pecking in pigeons with negative reinforcement. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[13]  W. Gardner Auto-shaping in bobwhite quail. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[14]  M Rilling,et al.  A preliminary analysis of the dynamics of the pecking response in pigeons. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[15]  E Gamzu,et al.  Classical Conditioning of a Complex Skeletal Response , 1971, Science.

[16]  J. Staddon,et al.  The "supersitition" experiment: A reexamination of its implications for the principles of adaptive behavior. , 1971 .