Differential Maturation of Climbing Fiber Innervation in Cerebellar Vermis

Folding of the brain surface is a general morphological adaptation to maximize surface area in a limited cranial volume. Surface folding is present not only in the neocortex but also in the cerebellar cortex. This folding creates subdivisions of the cortical surface: the sulci, the gyri, and the straight bank region, which is interposed. Is cortical folding only the solution to a surface-volume problem or does it also confer functional differences on the subdivisions that are created by this geometry? Here we have used the innervation of Purkinje cells by climbing fibers as a model system to explore potential functional differences. Purkinje cells are innervated by multiple climbing fibers at birth but undergo an activity-dependent refinement, such that by postnatal day (P) 21, most are contacted by a single climbing fiber. Using whole-cell recording from slices of cerebellar vermis derived from juvenile (P18-25) or adult (P60-83) mice, we found that significantly more Purkinje cells in the sulcus were innervated by multiple climbing fibers than in the gyrus or bank subdivisions; however, the basic properties of climbing fiber-Purkinje cell EPSCs such as kinetics, amplitude, and paired-pulse ratio were similar across cortical subdivisions. To search for a morphological correlate of differential multiple climbing fiber innervation, we labeled climbing fibers and performed reconstructions of immunofluorescent images. These revealed that, unlike the bank-gyrus subdivisions, most of the climbing fibers in the sulcus do not innervate the superficial molecular layer. These findings suggest that the subdivisions of the cerebellar cortex produced by folding may create functionally distinct entities.

[1]  栗原 秀雄 Impaired parallel fiber→purkinje cell synapse stabilization during cerebellar development of mutant mice lacking the glutamate receptor δ2 subunit , 1998 .

[2]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  Impaired motor coordination correlates with persistent multiple climbing fiber innervation in PKCγ mutant mice , 1995, Cell.

[3]  David Willshaw,et al.  The cerebellum as a neuronal machine , 1999 .

[4]  F. Crépel,et al.  Multiple innervation of Purkinje cells by climbing fibers in the cerebellum of the Weaver Mutant Mouse. , 1976, Journal of neurobiology.

[5]  Masahiko Watanabe,et al.  Impaired Parallel Fiber→Purkinje Cell Synapse Stabilization during Cerebellar Development of Mutant Mice Lacking the Glutamate Receptor δ2 Subunit , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  S. Tonegawa,et al.  Impaired synapse elimination during cerebellar development in PKC gamma mutant mice. , 1995, Cell.

[7]  F. Crépel,et al.  Evidence for a multiple innervation of Purkinje cells by climbing fibers in the immature rat cerebellum. , 1976, Journal of neurobiology.

[8]  P. Strata,et al.  A change in the pattern of activity affects the developmental regression of the purkinje cell polyinnervation by climbing fibers in the rat cerebellum , 2003, Neuroscience.

[9]  J. Houk,et al.  Somatosensory properties of the inferior olive of the cat , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[10]  R. Silver,et al.  Locus of frequency‐dependent depression identified with multiple‐probability fluctuation analysis at rat climbing fibre‐Purkinje cell synapses , 1998, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  R. Snider Neurobiology of cerebellar evolution and development , 1971 .

[12]  Masanobu Kano,et al.  Functional Differentiation of Multiple Climbing Fiber Inputs during Synapse Elimination in the Developing Cerebellum , 2003, Neuron.

[13]  Susumu Tonegawa,et al.  Persistent Multiple Climbing Fiber Innervationof Cerebellar Purkinje Cellsin Mice Lacking mGluR1 , 1997, Neuron.

[14]  H. Daniel,et al.  Incomplete regression of multiple climbing fibre innervation of cerebellar Purkinje cells in mGluR1 mutant mice , 1997, Neuroreport.

[15]  J. Mariani,et al.  Multiple innervation of Purkinje cells by climbing fibers in the cerebellum of the adult staggerer mutant mouse. , 1980, Journal of neurobiology.

[16]  S. Tonegawa,et al.  Impaired synapse elimination during cerebellar development in PKCγ mutant mice , 1995, Cell.

[17]  Y Shinoda,et al.  The Entire Trajectories of Single Olivocerebellar Axons in the Cerebellar Cortex and their Contribution to Cerebellar Compartmentalization , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  R. Hawkes Antigenic markers of cerebellar modules in the adult mouse. , 1992, Biochemical Society transactions.

[19]  P. Strata,et al.  Control of spine formation by electrical activity in the adult rat cerebellum. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  A. Konnerth,et al.  Roles of Glutamate Receptor δ2 Subunit (GluRδ2) and Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Subtype 1 (mGluR1) in Climbing Fiber Synapse Elimination during Postnatal Cerebellar Development , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  K. Herrup,et al.  The compartmentalization of the cerebellum. , 1997, Annual review of neuroscience.

[22]  P. Strata,et al.  Role of glutamate δ-2 receptors in activity-dependent competition between heterologous afferent fibers , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  V. Braitenberg,et al.  Morphological observations on the cerebellar cortex , 1958, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[24]  J. Mariani,et al.  Synapse Elimination in the Central Nervous System: Functional Significance and Cellular Mechanisms , 1996, Reviews in the neurosciences.

[25]  M. Kano,et al.  Phospholipase cbeta4 is specifically involved in climbing fiber synapse elimination in the developing cerebellum. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  F. Rossi,et al.  Postnatal development and adult organisation of the olivocerebellar projection map in the hypogranular cerebellum of the rat , 1999, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[27]  J. Changeux,et al.  Anatomical, physiological and biochemical studies of the cerebellum from Reeler mutant mouse. , 1977, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[28]  Masao Ito The Cerebellum And Neural Control , 1984 .

[29]  Wade G Regehr,et al.  Monitoring Presynaptic Calcium Dynamics in Projection Fibers by In Vivo Loading of a Novel Calcium Indicator , 2000, Neuron.

[30]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  Impaired motor coordination and persistent multiple climbing fiber innervation of cerebellar Purkinje cells in mice lacking Galphaq. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Masanobu Kano,et al.  Presynaptic origin of paired‐pulse depression at climbing fibre‐Purkinje cell synapses in the rat cerebellum , 1998, The Journal of physiology.

[32]  R F Schild,et al.  On the inferior olive of the albino rat , 1970, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[33]  P Strata,et al.  Different climbing fibres innervate separate dendritic regions of the same purkinje cell in hypogranular cerebellum , 1995, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[34]  Masahiko Watanabe,et al.  Distal Extension of Climbing Fiber Territory and Multiple Innervation Caused by Aberrant Wiring to Adjacent Spiny Branchlets in Cerebellar Purkinje Cells Lacking Glutamate Receptor δ2 , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  Karl Schilling,et al.  From zebra stripes to postal zones: deciphering patterns of gene expression in the cerebellum , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[36]  W I Welker,et al.  The significance of foliation and fissuration of cerebellar cortex. The cerebellar folium as a fundamental unit of sensorimotor integration. , 1990, Archives italiennes de biologie.

[37]  P. Strata,et al.  Plasticity of the olivocerebellar pathway , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.