Millisecond methane steam reforming via process and catalyst intensification

The steam reforming of methane on a rhodium/alumina based multifunctional microreactor is simulated using fundamental chemical kinetics in a pseudo-two-dimensional microreactor model. The microreactor consists of parallel catalytic plates, whereby catalytic combustion and reforming take place on opposite sides of a wall. Heat exchange happens through the wall. It is shown that reforming can happen in millisecond or lower contact times and proper balancing of flow rates can give high conversions, reasonably high temperatures, and high yield to syngas. It is found that tuning catalyst surface area and internal and external mass and heat transfer through reactor sizing can lead to further process intensification.

[1]  D. Vlachos,et al.  Effect of flow configuration on the operation of coupled combustor/reformer microdevices for hydrogen production , 2005 .

[2]  D. Vlachos,et al.  A reduced mechanism for methane and one-step rate expressions for fuel-lean catalytic combustion of small alkanes on noble metals , 2007 .

[3]  Asterios Gavriilidis,et al.  Catalytic combustion assisted methane steam reforming in a catalytic plate reactor , 2003 .

[4]  Dionisios G. Vlachos,et al.  CFD Simulations of Coupled, Countercurrent Combustor/Reformer Microdevices for Hydrogen Production , 2005 .

[5]  M. Ertan Taskin,et al.  3D CFD simulations of steam reforming with resolved intraparticle reaction and gradients , 2007 .

[6]  B. Sundén,et al.  Analysis of chemical-reaction-coupled mass and heat transport phenomena in a methane reformer duct for PEMFCs , 2007 .

[7]  Kevin Van Geem,et al.  Dimensional analysis for scaling up and down steam cracking coils , 2007 .

[8]  Eric D. Wetzel,et al.  Thermal Management in Catalytic Microreactors , 2006 .

[9]  G. Froment,et al.  Methane steam reforming, methanation and water‐gas shift: I. Intrinsic kinetics , 1989 .

[10]  Frédéric Vogel,et al.  Reactor modeling to simulate catalytic partial oxidation and steam reforming of methane. Comparison of temperature profiles and strategies for hot spot minimization , 2007 .

[11]  Robert J. Kee,et al.  A FORTRAN COMPUTER CODE PACKAGE FOR THE EVALUATION OF GAS-PHASE, MULTICOMPONENT TRANSPORT PROPERTIES , 1986 .

[12]  Lanny D. Schmidt,et al.  Steam reforming of methane and water-gas shift in catalytic wall reactors , 2003 .

[13]  Yong Wang,et al.  From seconds to milliseconds to microseconds through tailored microchannel reactor design of a steam methane reformer , 2007 .

[14]  D. G. Norton,et al.  A CFD study of propane/air microflame stability , 2004 .

[15]  Gregory S. Jackson,et al.  Transient modeling of combined catalytic combustion/CH4 steam reforming , 2003 .

[16]  D. Vlachos,et al.  Stability and performance of catalytic microreactors: Simulations of propane catalytic combustion on Pt , 2008 .

[17]  Hui Liu,et al.  Modeling of a metal monolith catalytic reactor for methane steam reforming–combustion coupling , 2007 .

[18]  D. Vlachos,et al.  Optimal reactor dimensions for homogeneous combustion in small channels , 2007 .