Theoretical Analysis of Perching and Hovering Maneuvers

Unsteady aerodynamic phenomena are encountered in a large number of modern aerospace and non-aerospace applications. Leading edge vortices (LEVs) are of particular interest because of their large impact on the forces and performance. In rotorcraft applications, they cause large vibrations and torsional loads (dynamic stall), affecting the performance adversely. In insect flight however, they contribute positively by enabling high-lift flight. Identifying the conditions that result in LEV formation and modeling their effects on the flow is an important ongoing challenge. Perching (airfoil decelerates to rest) and hovering (zero freestream velocity) maneuvers are of special interest. In earlier work by the authors, a Leading Edge Suction Parameter (LESP) was developed to predict LEV formation for airfoils undergoing arbitrary variation in pitch and plunge at a constant freestream velocity. In this research, the LESP criterion is extended to situations where the freestream velocity is varying or zero. A point-vortex model based on this criterion is developed and results from the model are compared against those from a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method. Abstractions of perching and hovering maneuvers are used to validate the low-order model's performance in highly unsteady vortex-dominated flows, where the time-varying freestream/translational velocity is small in magnitude compared to the other contributions to the velocity experienced by the leading edge region of the airfoil. Time instants of LEV formation, flow topologies and force coefficient histories for the various motion kinematics from the low-order model and CFD are obtained and compared. The LESP criterion is seen to be successful in predicting the start of LEV formation and the point-vortex method is effective in modeling the flow development and forces on the airfoil. Typical run-times for the low-order method are between 30-40 seconds, making it a potentially convenient tool for control/design applications.

[1]  J. Leishman,et al.  On the Influence of Time-Varying Flow Velocity on Unsteady Aerodynamics , 1994 .

[2]  Dragos Viieru,et al.  Effects of Reynolds Number and Flapping Kinematics on Hovering Aerodynamics , 2007 .

[3]  D. Kurtulus,et al.  Aerodynamic characteristics of flapping motion in hover , 2007 .

[4]  T. Kármán,et al.  Airfoil Theory for Non-Uniform Motion , 1938 .

[5]  J. Edwards,et al.  An unsteady airfoil theory applied to pitching motions validated against experiment and computation , 2013 .

[6]  Ashok Gopalarathnam,et al.  Effect of airfoil shape and Reynolds number on leading edge vortex shedding in unsteady flows , 2012 .

[7]  G. Vatistas,et al.  A simpler model for concentrated vortices , 1991 .

[8]  M. Dickinson,et al.  UNSTEADY AERODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE OF MODEL WINGS AT LOW REYNOLDS NUMBERS , 1993 .

[9]  A. Leonard.  Vortex methods for flow simulation , 1980 .

[10]  Jeff D. Eldredge,et al.  Low-order phenomenological modeling of leading-edge vortex formation , 2013 .

[11]  Alain Farcy,et al.  Characterization of vortical structures and loads based on time-resolved PIV for asymmetric hovering flapping flight , 2009 .

[12]  I. E. Garrick.  Propulsion of a flapping and oscillating airfoil , 1936 .

[13]  Rufus Isaacs,et al.  Airfoil Theory for Flows of Variable Velocity , 1945 .

[14]  Hao Liu,et al.  Flapping Wings and Aerodynamic Lift: The Role of Leading-Edge Vortices , 2007 .

[15]  Kevin Knowles,et al.  Non-linear unsteady aerodynamic model for insect-like flapping wings in the hover. Part 2: Implementation and validation , 2006 .

[16]  J. Edwards,et al.  Comparison of eddy viscosity-transport turbulence models for three-dimensional, shock-separated flowfields , 1996 .

[17]  Miguel R. Visbal,et al.  Experiments and Computations on Abstractions of Perching , 2010 .

[18]  Turgut Sarpkaya,et al.  An inviscid model of two-dimensional vortex shedding for transient and asymptotically steady separated flow over an inclined plate , 1975, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[19]  Gordon J. Berman,et al.  Energy-minimizing kinematics in hovering insect flight , 2007, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[20]  T. Theodorsen.  General Theory of Aerodynamic Instability and the Mechanism of Flutter , 1934 .

[21]  Kevin Knowles,et al.  Non-linear unsteady aerodynamic model for insect-like flapping wings in the hover. Part 1: Methodology and analysis , 2006 .

[22]  T. Kármán.  General aerodynamic theory. Perfect fluids , 1963 .

[23]  Joseph Katz,et al.  A discrete vortex method for the non-steady separated flow over an airfoil , 1981, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[24]  Ashok Gopalarathnam,et al.  Augmentation of inviscid airfoil theory to predict and model 2D unsteady vortex dominated flows , 2011 .

[25]  Jack R. Edwards,et al.  An investigation of interface-sharpening schemes for multi-phase mixture flows , 2009, J. Comput. Phys..

[26]  Ashok Gopalarathnam,et al.  Theoretical Modeling of Leading Edge Vortices Using the Leading Edge Suction Parameter , 2012 .

[27]  Herbert Wagner.  Über die Entstehung des dynamischen Auftriebes von Tragflügeln , 1925 .

[28]  Z. J. Wang,et al.  Unsteady forces on an accelerating plate and application to hovering insect flight , 2004, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[29]  Adrian L. R. Thomas,et al.  Leading-edge vortices in insect flight , 1996, Nature.

[30]  Jeff D. Eldredge,et al.  Improving vortex models via optimal control theory , 2013 .

[31]  C. Ellington.  The novel aerodynamics of insect flight: applications to micro-air vehicles. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[32]  P. Spalart.  A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[33]  J Mayo Greenberg,et al.  Airfoil in sinusoidal motion in a pulsating stream , 1947 .

[34]  R. Clements,et al.  An inviscid model of two-dimensional vortex shedding , 1973, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.