One of the most important tasks in investigating the organization and user requirements is to develop useful, valid, and reliable measures. On the one hand it is important that the organization does not become bogged down in a costly quagmire of overdetailed and unnecessary measures. On the other hand, without adequate attention to the issue of measurement, it is simply not possible to drive an appropriate design, implement, evaluate, and extend a system effectively. The failure literature points inescapably to this conclusion. There are few known cases of “overmeasurement,” where implementors concluded that they had erred on the side of too carefully investigating their needs and evaluating system impacts. The tragedies have fallen on the other side, where systems did not correspond to user needs, could not be cost justified, did not adequately take into account the user and organizational climate, and were not refined when required, etc.
[1]
David A. Nadler,et al.
Organizational assessment : perspectives on the measurement of organizational behavior and the quality of work life
,
1980
.
[2]
L. Cronbach,et al.
Construct validity in psychological tests.
,
1955,
Psychological bulletin.
[3]
Gerald M. Goldhaber.
The ICA Communication Audit: Rationale and Development.
,
1976
.
[4]
A. V. D. Ven,et al.
Measuring And Assessing Organizations
,
1980
.
[5]
D. Campbell,et al.
Unobtrusive Measures: Non-Reactive Research in the Social Sciences.
,
1966
.
[6]
Second Edition,et al.
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences
,
1970
.
[7]
D. Campbell,et al.
Unobtrusive Measures: Nonreactive Research in the Social Sciences
,
1966
.
[8]
D. Campbell,et al.
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
,
1959,
Psychological bulletin.