Effect of quantum mechanical global phase factor on error versus sensitivity limitation in quantum routing

In this paper, we explore the effect of the purely quantum mechanical global phase factor on the problem of controlling a ring-shaped quantum router to transfer its excitation from an initial spin to a specified target spin. "Quantum routing" on coherent spin networks is achieved by shaping the energy landscape with static bias control fields, which already results in the nonclassical feature of purely oscillatory closed-loop poles. However, more to the point, it is shown that the global phase factor requires a projective reinterpretation of the traditional tracking error where the wave function state is considered modulo its global phase factor. This results in a time-domain relaxation of the conflict between small tracking error and small sensitivity of the tracking error to structured uncertainties. While fundamentally quantum routing is achieved at a specific final time and hence calls for time-domain techniques, we also develop a projective s-domain limitation.

[1]  P. Anderson Absence of Diffusion in Certain Random Lattices , 1958 .

[2]  Per Kristen Jakobsen,et al.  An Introduction to Partial Differential Equations , 2019 .

[3]  M. Kendall A NEW MEASURE OF RANK CORRELATION , 1938 .

[4]  Sophie G. Schirmer,et al.  Structured Singular Value Analysis for Spintronics Network Information Transfer Control , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[5]  Fernando Casas,et al.  Efficient computation of the Zassenhaus formula , 2012, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[6]  Emanuel Gluskin,et al.  On the recovery of the time average of continuous and discrete time functions from their Laplace and z-transforms , 2013, Int. J. Circuit Theory Appl..

[7]  Ronald N. Bracewell,et al.  The Fourier Transform and Its Applications , 1966 .

[8]  Xi Chen,et al.  Experimental observation of the effect of global phase on optimal times of SU(2) quantum operations , 2019, Physical Review A.

[9]  T. J. Terpstra,et al.  The asymptotic normality and consistency of kendall's test against trend, when ties are present in one ranking , 1952 .

[10]  J. Neumann Distribution of the Ratio of the Mean Square Successive Difference to the Variance , 1941 .

[11]  R. Ortega Passivity-based control of Euler-Lagrange systems : mechanical, electrical and electromechanical applications , 1998 .

[12]  D. Sugny,et al.  Time-optimal control of SU(2) quantum operations , 2013, 1310.5226.

[13]  E. Jonckheere,et al.  Jonckheere‐Terpstra test for nonclassical error versus log‐sensitivity relationship of quantum spin network controllers , 2016, 1612.02784.

[14]  R. H. Kent,et al.  The Mean Square Successive Difference , 1941 .

[15]  A. R. Jonckheere,et al.  A DISTRIBUTION-FREE k-SAMPLE TEST AGAINST ORDERED ALTERNATIVES , 1954 .