Rethinking the role of social theory in socio-technical analysis: a critical realist approach to aircraft maintenance

Based on empirical research within the aviation industry we have come to some surprising and sometimes counterintuitive conclusions concerning aircraft maintenance that are relevant for the discussion of social theory and its application towards the explanation and management of socio-technical systems. In this article, the human role in the activity of aircraft maintenance is taken as an example to illustrate the need for critical discussions on social theory in order to better understand safety in socio-technical systems This challenges us to consider the theoretical basis related to how we currently approach the human factor in management of such systems. We propose in the article that Roy Bhaskars' book “The possibility of naturalism—a philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences (1979)” delivers a compelling social theory from which follows a social ontology of the objects of socio-technical systems that is a necessary precursor to developing applied models and empirical accounts of socio-technical systems.

[1]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Cognitive reliability and error analysis method : CREAM , 1998 .

[2]  Nick McDonald.  Human systems and aircraft maintenance , 2001 .

[3]  Nick McDonald,et al.  Modelling the human role in operational systems – theory and practice , 2006 .

[4]  R. Bhaskar.  A realist theory of science , 1976 .

[5]  James T. Reason,et al.  Managing the risks of organizational accidents , 1997 .

[6]  Simon Bennett.  Managing Maintenance Error: A Practical Guide , 2004 .

[7]  Nick McDonald.  Human-Centered Management for Aircraft Maintenance , 2004 .

[8]  A. J. Grimes.  Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies , 1985 .

[9]  P. Berger,et al.  The Social Construction of Reality , 1966 .

[10]  P. Berger,et al.  Social Construction of Reality , 1991, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society.

[11]  K. Weick,et al.  Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. , 1999 .

[12]  Sam Cromie,et al.  Safety management systems and safety culture in aircraft maintenance organisations , 2000 .

[13]  K. Roberts.  New Challenges to Understanding Organizations , 1993 .

[14]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[15]  J. Cruickshank,et al.  A Tale of Two Ontologies: An Immanent Critique of Critical Realism 1 , 2004 .

[16]  K. Weick.  Organizational Culture as a Source of High Reliability , 1987 .

[17]  K. Weick.  Making Sense of the Organization , 2000 .

[18]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem , 1997 .

[19]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Safety and reliability for managing risk , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[20]  Roy Bhaskar.  The Possibility Of Naturalism Vol.-i , 1979 .

[21]  R. Bhaskar,et al.  Critical Realism , 2011 .

[22]  Kenneth Pettersen,et al.  Explaining safe work practices in aviation line maintenance , 2008 .

[23]  Ole Andreas Engen,et al.  Technological change as a trade-off between social construction and technological paradigms , 2007 .

[24]  T. Laporte,et al.  Working in Practice But Not in Theory: Theoretical Challenges of “High-Reliability Organizations” , 1991 .

[25]  E. Trist,et al.  Some Social and Psychological Consequences of the Longwall Method of Coal-Getting , 1951 .