The iambic-trochaic law without iambs or trochees: Parsing speech for grouping and prominence.

Listeners parse the speech signal effortlessly into words and phrases, but many questions remain about how. One classic idea is that rhythm-related auditory principles play a role, in particular, that a psycho-acoustic "iambic-trochaic law" (ITL) ensures that alternating sounds varying in intensity are perceived as recurrent binary groups with initial prominence (trochees), while alternating sounds varying in duration are perceived as binary groups with final prominence (iambs). We test the hypothesis that the ITL is in fact an indirect consequence of the parsing of speech along two in-principle orthogonal dimensions: prominence and grouping. Results from several perception experiments show that the two dimensions, prominence and grouping, are each reliably cued by both intensity and duration, while foot type is not associated with consistent cues. The ITL emerges only when one manipulates either intensity or duration in an extreme way. Overall, the results suggest that foot perception is derivative of the cognitively more basic decisions of grouping and prominence, and the notions of trochee and iamb may not play any direct role in speech parsing. A task manipulation furthermore gives new insight into how these decisions mutually inform each other.

[1]  Jonah Katz Musical grouping as prosodic implementation , 2022, Linguistics and Philosophy.

[2]  Susanne Fuchs,et al.  Final Lengthening and vowel length in 25 languages , 2022, J. Phonetics.

[3]  Michael Wagner Two-dimensional parsing of the acoustic stream explains the Iambic-Trochaic Law. , 2021, Psychological review.

[4]  Tamara Rathcke,et al.  Structured heterogeneity in Scottish stops over the twentieth century , 2020, Language.

[5]  P. Bürkner,et al.  Modelling monotonic effects of ordinal predictors in Bayesian regression models. , 2020, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[6]  Megan J. Crowhurst The iambic/trochaic law: Nature or nurture? , 2020, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[7]  Michael McAuliffe,et al.  The effect of focus prominence on phrasing , 2019, J. Phonetics.

[8]  Mattan S. Ben-Shachar,et al.  Indices of Effect Existence and Significance in the Bayesian Framework , 2019, Front. Psychol..

[9]  Fangfang Li,et al.  Bayesian data analysis in the phonetic sciences: A tutorial introduction , 2018, J. Phonetics.

[10]  Josh H McDermott,et al.  Headphone screening to facilitate web-based auditory experiments , 2017, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[11]  Christian Robert,et al.  Statistical Rethinking , 2017 .

[12]  Megan J. Crowhurst Iambic-Trochaic Law Effects among Native Speakers of Spanish and English , 2016 .

[13]  Barbara Höhle,et al.  Language Experience Affects Grouping of Musical Instrument Sounds , 2016, Cogn. Sci..

[14]  J. Gervain,et al.  Language dominance shapes non-linguistic rhythmic grouping in bilinguals , 2016, Cognition.

[15]  T. Nazzi,et al.  An Exploration of Rhythmic Grouping of Speech Sequences by French- and German-Learning Infants , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[16]  Shravan Vasishth,et al.  Statistical Methods for Linguistic Research: Foundational Ideas - Part I , 2016, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[17]  Lisa Davidson,et al.  Variability in the implementation of voicing in American English obstruents , 2016, J. Phonetics.

[18]  L. Robert Slevc,et al.  Prosodic Structure as a Parallel to Musical Structure , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[19]  Joshua de Leeuw,et al.  jsPsych: A JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a Web browser , 2014, Behavior Research Methods.

[20]  Manuel Carreiras,et al.  The Amount of Language Exposure Determines Nonlinguistic Tone Grouping Biases in Infants from a Bilingual Environment. , 2014 .

[21]  Barbara Höhle,et al.  Native language affects rhythmic grouping of speech. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Jessica F. Hay,et al.  Rhythmic grouping biases constrain infant statistical learning. , 2012, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[23]  Amalia Arvaniti,et al.  The usefulness of metrics in the quantification of speech rhythm , 2012, J. Phonetics.

[24]  M. Peña,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning , Memory , and Cognition How Modality Specific Is the Iambic – Trochaic Law ? Evidence From Vision , 2011 .

[25]  Silvia Benavides-Varela,et al.  Acoustic Markers of Prominence Influence Infants’ and Adults’ Segmentation of Speech Sequences , 2011, Language and speech.

[26]  Reiko Mazuka,et al.  The development of perceptual grouping biases in infancy: A Japanese-English cross-linguistic study , 2010, Cognition.

[27]  Aniruddh D. Patel,et al.  Perception of rhythmic grouping depends on auditory experience. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  Aniruddh D. Patel Music, Language, and the Brain , 2007 .

[29]  M. Gordon Syllable Weight: Phonetics, Phonology, Typology , 2006 .

[30]  Low Ee Ling,et al.  Q uantitative Characterizations of Speech Rhythm: Syllable-Timing in Singapore English , 2000, Language and speech.

[31]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  Word-boundary-related duration patterns in English , 2000, J. Phonetics.

[32]  F. Ramus,et al.  Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal , 1999, Cognition.

[33]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Phonotactic and Prosodic Effects on Word Segmentation in Infants , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[34]  E. Newport,et al.  Computation of Conditional Probability Statistics by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1998 .

[35]  Colin W. Wightman,et al.  Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access , 1988 .

[37]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary , 1987 .

[38]  M. Beckman Stress And Non-Stress Accent , 1986 .

[39]  D. K. Oller,et al.  The effect of position in utterance on speech segment duration in English. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  A. Bregman,et al.  Primary auditory stream segregation and perception of order in rapid sequences of tones. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[41]  D. Abercrombie,et al.  A PHONETICIAN’S VIEW OF VERSE STRUCTURE , 1964 .

[42]  R. M. Warren,et al.  An auditory analogue of the visual reversible figure. , 1958, The American journal of psychology.

[43]  D. Fry Experiments in the Perception of Stress , 1958 .

[44]  Dharmesh Patel Rhythm , 1919, The Craft of Poetry.