The type of aortic cannula and membrane oxygenator affect the pulsatile waveform morphology produced by a neonate-infant cardiopulmonary bypass system in vivo.

Although the debate still continues over the effectiveness of pulsatile versus nonpulsatile perfusion, it has been clearly proven that there are several significant physiological benefits of pulsatile perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) compared to nonpulsatile perfusion. However, the components of the extracorporeal circuit have not been fully investigated regarding the quality of the pulsatility. In addition, most of these results have been gathered from adult patients, not from neonates and infants. We have designed and tested a neonate-infant pulsatile CPB system using 2 different types of 10 Fr aortic cannulas and membrane oxygenators in 3 kg piglets to evaluate the effects of these components on the pulsatile waveform produced by the system. In terms of the methods, Group 1 (Capiox 308 hollow-fiber membrane oxygenator and DLP aortic cannula with a very short 10 Fr tip [n = 2]) was subjected to a 2 h period of normothermic pulsatile CPB with a pump flow rate of 150 ml/kg/min. Data were obtained at 5, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min of CPB. In Group 2 (Capiox 308 hollow-fiber membrane oxygenator and Elecath aortic cannula with a very long 10 Fr tip [n = 7]) and Group 3 (cobe VPCML Plus flat sheet membrane oxygenator and DLP aortic cannula with a very short 10 Fr tip [n = 7]), the subjects' nasopharyngeal temperatures were reduced to 18 degrees C followed by 1 h of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) and then 40 min rewarming. Data were obtained during normothermic CPB in the pre- and post-DHCA periods. The criteria of pulsatility evaluations were based upon pulse pressure (between 30 and 40 mm Hg), aortic dp/dt (greater than 1000 mm Hg/s), and ejection time (less than 250 ms). The results showed that Group 1 produced flow which was significantly more pulsatile than that of the other 2 groups. Although the same oxygenator was used for Group 2, the quality of the pulsatile flow decreased when using a different aortic cannula. Group 3 did not meet any of the criteria for physiologic pulsatility. In conclusion these data suggest that in addition to a pulsatile pump, the aortic cannula and the membrane oxygenator must be chosen carefully to achieve physiologic pulsatile flow during CPB.

[1]  R. Groom,et al.  Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Review of Current Practice , 1996, International anesthesiology clinics.

[2]  S. E. Ottmers,et al.  Design of a Physiologic Pulsatile Flow Cardiopulmonary Bypass System for Neonates and Infants , 1996, The International journal of artificial organs.

[3]  A. Buchan,et al.  A randomized study of the influence of perfusion technique and pH management strategy in 316 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. I. Mortality and cardiovascular morbidity. , 1995, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[4]  Hiroyuki Orita,et al.  Brain tissue pH, oxygen tension, and carbon dioxide tension in profoundly hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass. Comparative study of circulatory arrest, nonpulsatile low-flow perfusion, and pulsatile low-flow perfusion. , 1989 .

[5]  F. Spencer,et al.  Quantification of pulsatile flow during cardiopulmonary bypass to permit direct comparison of the effectiveness of various types of "pulsatile" and "nonpulsatile" flow. , 1985, Surgery.

[6]  J. Linley,et al.  The detection of microemboli in the middle cerebral artery during cardiopulmonary bypass: a transcranial Doppler ultrasound investigation using membrane and bubble oxygenators. , 1987, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[7]  T. Gourlay,et al.  Pulsatile flow and membrane oxygenators , 1994, Perfusion.

[8]  Influence of oxygenator type on the prevalence and extent of microembolic retinal ischemia during cardiopulmonary bypass. Assessment by digital image analysis. , 1990 .

[9]  M. Washio,et al.  Pulsatile low-flow perfusion for enhanced cerebral protection. , 1993, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[10]  W. Greeley,et al.  Monitoring the brain during cardiac surgery in children , 1993, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[11]  B. Crain,et al.  Pulsatile reperfusion after cardiac arrest improves neurologic outcome. , 1991, Annals of surgery.

[12]  A. Undar,et al.  Design and performance of a physiologic pulsatile flow neonate-infant cardiopulmonary bypass system. , 1996, ASAIO journal.

[13]  Gordon Wright,et al.  The hydraulic power outputs of pulsatile and nonpulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass pumps , 1988 .

[14]  M. Onoe,et al.  A clinical study on the effects of pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass on the blood endotoxin levels. , 1994, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[15]  G Wright,et al.  Hemodynamic analysis could resolve the pulsatile blood flow controversy. , 1994, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[16]  G. S. Campbell,et al.  Pulsatile perfusion versus conventional high-flow nonpulsatile perfusion for rapid core cooling and rewarming of infants for circulatory arrest in cardiac operation. , 1979, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[17]  P C Ferry,et al.  Neurologic sequelae of open-heart surgery in children. An 'irritating question'. , 1990, American journal of diseases of children.

[18]  A. Undar,et al.  Regional blood flow during pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass and after circulatory arrest in an infant model. , 1997, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[19]  A. Furness,et al.  What is pulsatile flow? , 1985, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[20]  R. Körfer,et al.  Effects of pulsatile perfusion on plasma catecholamine levels and hemodynamics during and after cardiac operations with cardiopulmonary bypass. , 1990, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[21]  W. White,et al.  Pulsatile versus nonpulsatile reperfusion improves cerebral blood flow after cardiac arrest. , 1993, The Annals of thoracic surgery.