Influence of prosthetic parameters on the survival and complication rates of short implants.

PURPOSE Implants shorter than 10 mm can be a long-term solution for sites with limited bone height. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of some prosthetic factors on the survival and complication rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS Two hundred sixty-two short machined-surface Brånemark System implants were consecutively placed in 109 patients and followed for a mean of 53 months. The prosthetic parameters were recorded, and the data were examined for relation to peri-implant bone loss and biologic or biomechanical complications. RESULTS Relatively few crown-to-implant (C/I) ratios were < 1 or > 2 (16.2%). Occlusal table (OT) width ranged from 5.4 to 8.3 mm. Opposing dentition was most often natural teeth, a fixed prosthesis supported by natural teeth, or an implant-supported fixed restoration. Occlusion with a normal buccolingual maxillomandibular relationship was found in 72.7% of the cases. No significant difference in peri-implant bone loss was correlated with C/I ratio or OT. Neither cantilever length nor bruxism had a significant effect on peri-implant bone loss. Mean bone loss was 0.74 +/- .65 mm. The difference in the complication rate (15% overall) between the bruxer and the nonbruxer group was not statistically significant (P = .51). One implant was lost in a heavy bruxer after 7 years of function. DISCUSSION Increased C/I and OT values do not seem to be a major risk factor in cases of favorable loading. In 67% of the cases, the mesiodistal length of the prosthesis was less than the corresponding natural tooth length, which may have contributed to better load distribution and more favorable results. CONCLUSIONS Short implants appear to be a longterm viable solution in sites with reduced bone height, even when the prosthetic parameters exceed the normal values, provided that force orientation and load distribution are favorable and parafunction is controlled.

[1]  A. Gonshor,et al.  Retrospective multicenter analysis of 3i endosseous dental implants placed over a five-year period , 1996 .

[2]  G A Niznick,et al.  Bending overload and implant fracture: a retrospective clinical analysis. , 1996, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[3]  R Skalak,et al.  Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. , 1983, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[4]  J. Gunne,et al.  Tooth-implant and implant supported fixed partial dentures: a 10-year report. , 1999, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[5]  D. Steenberghe,et al.  Ten-year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum Brånemark in full edentulism. , 1995, Clinical oral implants research.

[6]  M Nevins,et al.  The successful application of osseointegrated implants to the posterior jaw: a long-term retrospective study. , 1993, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[7]  M. Chiapasco,et al.  Implant-supported fixed cantilever prostheses in partially edentulous arches. A seven-year prospective study. , 2003, Clinical oral implants research.

[8]  O. Miyakawa,et al.  Influence of prosthesis material on stress distribution in bone and implant: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. , 1998, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[9]  T. Jemt,et al.  Load factor control for implants in the posterior partially edentulous segment. , 1997, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[10]  J. Hirsch,et al.  Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (II). Etiopathogenesis. , 1998, European journal of oral sciences.

[11]  M. Pharoah,et al.  Use of the Endopore dental implant to restore single teeth in the maxilla: protocol and early results. , 1998, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[12]  G. Polizzi,et al.  A 3-year prospective multicenter follow-up report on the immediate and delayed-immediate placement of implants. , 1999, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[13]  M. Quirynen,et al.  A six-year prosthodontic study of 509 consecutively inserted implants for the treatment of partial edentulism. , 1992, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[14]  C Foitzik,et al.  Short (6-mm) nonsubmerged dental implants: results of a Multicenter clinical trial of 1 to 7 years. , 1998, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[15]  M W Bidez,et al.  Force transfer in implant dentistry: basic concepts and principles. , 1992, The Journal of oral implantology.

[16]  D van Steenberghe,et al.  Survival of the Brånemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: a 10-year prospective multicenter study. , 1999, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[17]  Georges Tawil,et al.  Clinical evaluation of short, machined-surface implants followed for 12 to 92 months. , 2003, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[18]  M J Morgan,et al.  Fractures of the fixture component of an osseointegrated implant. , 1993, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[19]  P J Becker,et al.  Survival of fixed implant-supported prostheses related to cantilever lengths. , 1994, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[20]  J. Bernard,et al.  A 7-year life table analysis from a prospective study on ITI implants with special emphasis on the use of short implants. Results from a private practice. , 2004, Clinical oral implants research.

[21]  I Herrmann,et al.  Osseointegrated implants for single-tooth replacement: a prospective 5-year multicenter study. , 1996, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[22]  T. Magnusson,et al.  Complications after treatment with implant-supported fixed prostheses: a retrospective study. , 2003, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[23]  D. Smith,et al.  A prospective clinical study in humans of an endosseous dental implant partially covered with a powder-sintered porous coating: 3- to 4-year results. , 1996, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[24]  J B Brunski,et al.  Biomechanical factors affecting the bone-dental implant interface. , 1992, Clinical materials.

[25]  B Rangert,et al.  Forces and moments on Branemark implants. , 1989, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[26]  M. Pharoah,et al.  Managing the posterior mandible of partially edentulous patients with short, porous-surfaced dental implants: early data from a clinical trial. , 2001, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[27]  Y. Çiftçi,et al.  The effect of veneering materials on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prosthetic restorations. , 2000, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[28]  O. Miyakawa,et al.  Influence of restoration type on stress distribution in bone around implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. , 1998, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[29]  J. Hobkirk,et al.  The influence of occlusal surface material on peak masticatory forces using osseointegrated implant-supported prostheses. , 1992, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.