Measuring total-factor CO2 emission performance and technology gaps using a non-radial directional distance function: A modified approach

Implementing the “common but differentiated responsibilities” principle for CO2 mitigation requires an understanding of CO2 emission performance and technology gaps in different countries. This paper uses a meta-frontier and non-radial directional distance function to propose an alternative three stage approach to measure total-factor CO2 emission performance and technology gaps. The first stage calculates the CO2 emission performance of the group frontier. The second stage uses these results to calculate the technology gap ratio. The third stage integrates data from the first two stages to calculate CO2 emission performance under the meta-frontier. This approach is easier to apply than other approaches in the literature, and effectively avoids the phenomenon of the technology gap ratio being greater than unity. The proposed approach can also decompose CO2 emission performance loss into two categories: management inefficiency and technical gaps. To demonstrate the method, an empirical analysis using data for 54 countries was conducted. The study highlighted three main findings. First, upper-middle income countries did not perform as well as high income countries and lower-middle income countries. Second, high income countries generally enjoy optimized production technology, whereas the lower-middle income countries generally had the lowest technological levels. Third, both management inefficiency and technical gaps negatively impacted CO2 emission performance, but management inefficiency played a dominant role.

[1]  Ching-Ren Chiu,et al.  Decomposition of the environmental inefficiency of the meta-frontier with undesirable output , 2012 .

[2]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Directional distance functions and slacks-based measures of efficiency , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Structural decomposition analysis applied to energy and emissions: Some methodological developments , 2012 .

[4]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Productivity and Undesirable Outputs: A Directional Distance Function Approach , 1995 .

[5]  N. Stern The Economics of Climate Change: Implications of Climate Change for Development , 2007 .

[6]  P. He,et al.  Estimation of potential energy saving and carbon dioxide emission reduction in China based on an extended non-radial DEA approach , 2013 .

[7]  Je-Liang Liou,et al.  Will economic development enhance the energy use efficiency and CO2 emission control efficiency? , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[8]  Tai-Hsin Huang,et al.  Applying the New Metafrontier Directional Distance Function to Compare Banking Efficiencies in Central and Eastern European Countries , 2015 .

[9]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Environmental production functions and environmental directional distance functions , 2007 .

[10]  Cliff C. J. Huang,et al.  A new approach to estimating the metafrontier production function based on a stochastic frontier framework , 2014 .

[11]  G. Battese,et al.  A Metafrontier Production Function for Estimation of Technical Efficiencies and Technology Gaps for Firms Operating Under Different Technologies , 2004 .

[12]  Ning Zhang,et al.  Total-factor carbon emission performance of fossil fuel power plants in China: A metafrontier non-radial Malmquist index analysis , 2013 .

[13]  Shaun S. Wang,et al.  Measuring carbon dioxide emission performance in Chinese provinces: A parametric approach , 2013 .

[14]  Chi-Chung Chen,et al.  Measuring the environmental efficiency of countries: a directional distance function metafrontier approach. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[15]  Y. Hayami,et al.  Agricultural Development: An International Perspective. , 1972 .

[16]  Dong-hyun Oh A metafrontier approach for measuring an environmentally sensitive productivity growth index , 2010 .

[17]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Total factor carbon emission performance: A Malmquist index analysis , 2010 .

[18]  Dequn Zhou,et al.  Optimal path for controlling CO2 emissions in China: A perspective of efficiency analysis , 2014 .

[19]  Jeffrey G. Williamson,et al.  Agricultural Development: An International Perspective. By Yujiro Hayami and Vernon Ruttan. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1971. Pp. xiv, 367 + 52 Tables, 26 Charts. $10.00. , 1973, The Journal of Economic History.

[20]  Kerui Du,et al.  Sources of the potential CO2 emission reduction in China: A nonparametric metafrontier approach , 2014 .

[21]  Ning Zhang,et al.  Energy efficiency, CO2 emission performance and technology gaps in fossil fuel electricity generation in Korea: A meta-frontier non-radial directional distance functionanalysis , 2013 .

[22]  Jiansheng Qu,et al.  A quantitative comparison and analysis on the assessment indicators of greenhouse gases emission , 2008 .

[23]  B. W. Ang,et al.  A cross-country analysis of aggregate energy and carbon intensities , 2006 .

[24]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Energy and emissions efficiency patterns of Chinese regions: A multi-directional efficiency analysis , 2013 .

[25]  Wei Zhang,et al.  A Malmquist CO2 emission performance index based on a metafrontier approach , 2013, Math. Comput. Model..

[26]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  The differences of carbon intensity reduction rate across 89 countries in recent three decades , 2014 .

[27]  Hui Wang,et al.  Energy and CO2 emission performance in electricity generation: A non-radial directional distance function approach , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  Qunwei Wang,et al.  An International Comparison of Carbon Dioxide Emission Performance Using the Nonparametric Metafrontier Approach , 2014 .

[29]  T. Luzzati,et al.  Investigating the energy-environmental Kuznets curve , 2009 .

[30]  Dequn Zhou,et al.  Scenario-based energy efficiency and productivity in China: A non-radial directional distance function analysis , 2013 .

[31]  Jin-Li Hu,et al.  Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China , 2006 .

[32]  G. Battese,et al.  Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios , 2008 .

[33]  Lei Zhu,et al.  Evaluation of potential reductions in carbon emissions in Chinese provinces based on environmental DEA , 2011 .

[34]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) assessment of operational and environmental efficiencies on Japanese regional industries , 2014 .

[35]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Changes in carbon intensity in China: Empirical findings from 1980-2003 , 2007 .

[36]  P. Zhou,et al.  Total-factor carbon emission performance of the Chinese transportation industry: A bootstrapped non-radial Malmquist index analysis , 2015 .