Maximization of the Profit of a Complex Combined-Cycle Cogeneration Plant Using a Professional Process Simulator

The high cost of energy resources has driven a strong and continued quest for their optimal utilization. In this context, modern thermoeconomic optimization techniques have been developed to analyze and design improved energy systems, leading to a better compromise between energetic efficiency and cost. Thermoeconomic optimization can be parametric (plant configuration is fixed), applicable both at the design phase or operation phase of a system, or structural (plant configuration may vary). In practice, mathematical thermoeconomic optimization may be accomplished in two ways: (i) the conventional way, which manipulates all pertinent equations simultaneously or (ii) integrated with a professional process simulator, such that the equations are manipulated separately. In the latter case, the simulator deals with the thermodynamic property and balance equations, while an external optimization routine, linked to the simulator, deals with the economic equations and objective function. In this work, a previous implementation of an integrated approach for parametric mathematical thermoeconomic optimization of complex thermal systems is applied to an actual combined-cycle cogeneration plant located in the outskirts of the city of Rio de Janeiro in Brazil. The plant contains more than 60 thermal components, including two gas turbines, one steam turbine, and two heat recovery steam generators. Several hundred variables are required to simulate the plant at one operational steady-state. The plant produces 380 MW of power nominally, and exports a mass flow rate between 200 tons/h and 400 tons/h of superheated process steam, at 45 bars and 404°C, to a neighboring refinery. The simulator is the THERMOFLEX software, which interfaces with the Microsoft Excel program. The optimization routine is written in the Visual Basic for Applications language and is based on Powell’s method. The cogeneration plant operates subjected to time-changing economic scenarios, because of varying fuel, electricity, and steam prices. Thus, to manage the plant, it is necessary to vary the operational state appropriately as the economic parameters change. For a prescribed economic scenario, previous work determined the minimum operational cost, when a fixed contracted hourly-rate of process steam was to be exported, while a variable amount of electrical power was produced. In this paper, a broader optimization problem is formulated and solved, for which the objective is to maximize the plant profit under different economic scenarios. It is shown that the optimal operating conditions depend on the economic parameters, and do not necessarily imply maximum efficiency. The integrated optimization approach proves effective, robust, and helpful for optimal plant management.

[1]  Manuel E. Cruz,et al.  Optimization of the Operation of a Complex Combined-Cycle Cogeneration Plant Using a Professional Process Simulator , 2008 .

[2]  Manuel E. Cruz,et al.  Integration of an iterative methodology for exergoeconomic improvement of thermal systems with a process simulator , 2004 .

[3]  Zhen Lu,et al.  Dynamic modeling and simulation of an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) system for waste heat recovery , 2008 .

[4]  Y. M. El-Sayed A second-law-based optimization: Part 1 - Methodology , 1996 .

[5]  M. J. Moran,et al.  Thermal design and optimization , 1995 .

[6]  Maziar Ghazinejad,et al.  Thermoeconomic Optimization of Gas Turbine Combined Heat and Power System in a Paper Mill , 2007 .

[7]  Antonio Piacentino,et al.  Optimal design of CHCP plants in the civil sector by thermoeconomics , 2007 .

[8]  Ho-Young Kwak,et al.  Exergoeconomic analysis of gas turbine cogeneration systems , 2001 .

[9]  Chuguang Zheng,et al.  Exergy cost analysis of a coal fired power plant based on structural theory of thermoeconomics , 2006 .

[10]  Silvio de Oliveira Junior,et al.  Exergy-based method for analyzing the composition of the electricity cost generated in gas-fired combined cycle plants , 2008 .

[11]  Alberto Traverso,et al.  WIDGET-TEMP: A Novel Web-Based Approach for Thermoeconomic Analysis and Optimization of Conventional and Innovative Cycles , 2004 .

[12]  Silvia A. Nebra,et al.  Basic chemically recuperated gas turbines—power plant optimization and thermodynamics second law analysis , 2004 .

[13]  Christos Athanasios Frangopoulos,et al.  Thermoeconomic functional analysis :a method for optimal design or improvement of complex thermal systems , 1983 .

[14]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Exergy: Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development , 2007 .

[15]  Luis I. Díez,et al.  Modelling of pulverized coal boilers: review and validation of on-line simulation techniques , 2005 .

[16]  George Tsatsaronis,et al.  ON AVOIDABLE AND UNAVOIDABLE EXERGY DESTRUCTIONS AND INVESTMENT COSTS IN THERMAL SYSTEMS , 2002 .

[17]  Andrea Lazzaretto,et al.  On the Thermoeconomic Approach to the Diagnosis of Energy System Malfuntions. Part-1 The TADEUS Problem , 2002 .

[18]  Yogesh Jaluria,et al.  Design and Optimization of Thermal Systems , 1997 .

[19]  Ulf Linder,et al.  Thermo-economic optimization of whole gas turbine plant (GTPOM) , 2004 .

[20]  T. J. Kotas,et al.  The Exergy Method of Thermal Plant Analysis , 2012 .

[21]  Antonio Valero Exergy accounting: Capabilities and drawbacks , 2006 .

[22]  Michael von Spakovsky,et al.  Application of Engineering Functional Analysis to the Analysis and Optimization of the CGAM Problem , 1994 .

[23]  Y. M. El-Sayed A second-law-based optimization. Part 2: Application , 1996 .

[24]  George Tsatsaronis,et al.  Thermoeconomic analysis and optimization of energy systems , 1993 .

[25]  G. Tsatsaronis Definitions and nomenclature in exergy analysis and exergoeconomics , 2007 .

[26]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Introduction to Optimum Design , 1988 .

[27]  Andrea Lazzaretto,et al.  SPECO: A systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems , 2006 .

[28]  George Tsatsaronis,et al.  Iterative exergoeconomic evaluation and improvement of thermal power plants using fuzzy inference systems , 2002 .

[29]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Exergy-cost-energy-mass analysis of thermal systems and processes , 2003 .

[30]  M. J. D. Powell,et al.  An efficient method for finding the minimum of a function of several variables without calculating derivatives , 1964, Comput. J..

[31]  George Tsatsaronis,et al.  Auxiliary equations for the determination of specific exergy revenues , 2006 .

[32]  Ryohei Yokoyama,et al.  Thermoeconomic Analysis and Optimization of a Gas Turbine Cogeneration Unit by a Systems Approach , 2005 .

[33]  Miguel A. Lozano,et al.  Theory of the exergetic cost , 1993 .

[34]  George Tsatsaronis,et al.  Optimization of combined cycle power plants using evolutionary algorithms , 2007 .

[35]  Enrico Sciubba,et al.  Exergy-based lumped simulation of complex systems: An interactive analysis tool , 2006 .

[36]  Yehia M. El-Sayed,et al.  The Thermoeconomics of Energy Conversions , 2003 .

[37]  David Mautner Himmelblau,et al.  Applied Nonlinear Programming , 1972 .

[38]  Manuel E. Cruz,et al.  Mathematical exergoeconomic optimization of a complex cogeneration plant aided by a professional process simulator , 2006 .