Cost-effectiveness of Sacubitril-Valsartan in Hospitalized Patients Who Have Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Importance Sacubitril-valsartan use reduces mortality and hospitalizations compared with enalapril among patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF); however, the cost-effectiveness of these treatments when initiated during hospitalization for HF is unknown. Objective To estimate the cost-effectiveness of inpatient initiation of sacubitril-valsartan vs enalapril compared with no initiation or posthospitalization initiation of sacubitril-valsartan among stabilized patients with HFrEF. Design, Setting, and Participants This economic evaluation included data on US patients with HFrEF who were eligible for sacubitril-valsartan treatment from December 8, 2009, to May 15, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures A 5-state Markov model with all-cause mortality, HF, and non-HF hospitalization probabilities was used. Quality of life was estimated using Euro-QoL EQ-5D scores. Hospitalization, long-term care, and medication costs for sacubitril-valsartan and enalapril were modeled with a discount rate of 3%. The base-case analysis included a lifetime horizon from a health care and societal perspective. Results Modeled patients were a mean (SD) age of 63.8 (11.5) years. Inpatient treatment with sacubitril-valsartan ($5628 per year) was associated with 62 fewer HF-related admissions per 1000 patients compared with outpatient initiation or 116 fewer HF-related admissions compared with continuation of enalapril treatment. From a health care system perspective, initiation of sacubitril-valsartan during hospitalization saved $452 per year compared with continuing enalapril and $811 per year compared with initiation at 2 months after hospitalization and was associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $21 532 per quality-adjusted life-year compared with continued enalapril treatment over a lifetime. From a societal perspective, inpatient initiation was estimated to save $460 per year per patient compared with no initiation of sacubitril-valsartan and $813 per year per patient compared with initiation after hospitalization. In a budget analysis, inpatient initiation of sacubitril-valsartan was estimated to save up to $449 per person for 1 year or $2550 per person over 5 years compared with continuation of enalapril. Conclusions and Relevance The findings suggest that, for patients with HFrEF, initiation of sacubitril-valsartan during hospitalization may be associated with reduced hospitalizations, increased quality-adjusted life expectancy, and cost savings compared with no initiation or initiation after hospitalization.

[1]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Health Impact and Cost-Effectiveness of Volume, Tiered, and Absolute Sugar Content Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax Policies in the United States , 2020, Circulation.

[2]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Health and Economic Impacts of the National Menu Calorie Labeling Law in the United States , 2020, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[3]  M. Weinstein,et al.  Modeling the cost effectiveness and budgetary impact of Polypills for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in the United States. , 2019, American heart journal.

[4]  Francesca N. Delling,et al.  Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2019 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association , 2019, Circulation.

[5]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Angiotensin–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  G. Sanders,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine , 2016 .

[7]  T. Trikalinos,et al.  Recommendations for Conduct, Methodological Practices, and Reporting of Cost-effectiveness Analyses: Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. , 2016, JAMA.

[8]  Wing W. Chan,et al.  Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Sacubitril/Valsartan vs Enalapril in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction. , 2016, JAMA cardiology.

[9]  John B. Wong,et al.  Decision making in health and medicine: Integrating evidence and values, second edition , 2014 .

[10]  Akshay S. Desai,et al.  Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  Joshua T. Cohen,et al.  Updating cost-effectiveness--the curious resilience of the $50,000-per-QALY threshold. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  G. Fonarow,et al.  ACC/AHA statement on cost/value methodology in clinical practice guidelines and performance measures: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures and Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2014, Circulation.

[13]  M. Krucoff,et al.  A Reevaluation of the Costs of Heart Failure and Its Implications for Allocation of Health Resources in the United States , 2014, Clinical cardiology.

[14]  L. Shaw,et al.  ACC/AHA statement on cost/value methodology in clinical practice guidelines and performance measures: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures and Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  V. Roger Epidemiology of Heart Failure , 2013, Circulation research.

[16]  I. Piña,et al.  Forecasting the Impact of Heart Failure in the United States: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association , 2013, Circulation. Heart failure.

[17]  David Thompson,et al.  Cost Estimation of Cardiovascular Disease Events in the US , 2011, PharmacoEconomics.

[18]  Andrew H. Briggs,et al.  Handling Uncertainty in Cost-Effectiveness Models , 2000, PharmacoEconomics.

[19]  V. Roger,et al.  Lifetime Costs of Medical Care After Heart Failure Diagnosis , 2011, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[20]  Bengt Jönsson,et al.  Ten arguments for a societal perspective in the economic evaluation of medical innovations , 2009, The European Journal of Health Economics.

[21]  Milton C Weinstein,et al.  Heart failure disease management programs: a cost-effectiveness analysis. , 2008, American heart journal.

[22]  T. Gaziano,et al.  Cardiovascular Disease in the Developing World and Its Cost-Effective Management , 2005, Circulation.

[23]  Chris Hyde,et al.  Decision Making in Health and Medicine. Integrating Evidence and Values , 2005, ACP Journal Club.

[24]  M. Weinstein,et al.  Decision Making in Health and Medicine , 2001 .

[25]  G. Oster,et al.  Cost effectiveness of carvedilol for heart failure. , 1999, The American journal of cardiology.

[26]  K. Deluzio,et al.  Risk Management and Healthcare Policy , 2022 .