Active Site Plasticity of a Computationally Designed Retro‐Aldolase Enzyme

RA110 is a computationally designed retro‐aldolase enzyme that utilizes amine catalysis to convert 4‐hydroxy‐4‐(6‐methoxy‐2‐naphthyl)‐2‐butanone to 6‐methoxy‐2‐naphthaldehyde and acetone. The original design accelerated substrate cleavage by a factor of 12 000 over background, and its activity was subsequently increased more than a thousand‐fold by directed evolution. The X‐ray structure of the evolved catalyst covalently modified with a 1,3‐diketone inhibitor deviates substantially from the design model, however, with the ligand adopting a completely different orientation than predicted. Moreover, significant activity was maintained even after relocation of the reactive lysine within the apolar binding pocket. These results suggest that the success of the original design is not ascribable to atomically accurate molecular recognition, but rather to successful placement of a reactive lysine adjacent to an apolar binding pocket. Nevertheless, the stabilizing interactions observed at the active site of the evolved variant suggest that improvements in the precision of design calculations will afford enzymes with higher catalytic activities.

[1]  R. Lerner,et al.  Efficient Aldolase Catalytic Antibodies That Use the Enamine Mechanism of Natural Enzymes , 1995, Science.

[2]  Eric A. Althoff,et al.  Kemp elimination catalysts by computational enzyme design , 2008, Nature.

[3]  J. Périé,et al.  Class I aldolases: substrate specificity, mechanism, inhibitors and structural aspects. , 1995, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[4]  David Baker,et al.  Structural analyses of covalent enzyme-substrate analog complexes reveal strengths and limitations of de novo enzyme design. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  Roberto A. Chica,et al.  Iterative approach to computational enzyme design , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  D. Hilvert,et al.  Harnessing protein symmetry for enzyme design , 2012 .

[7]  S. Ho,et al.  Site-directed mutagenesis by overlap extension using the polymerase chain reaction. , 1989, Gene.

[8]  David Baker,et al.  Origins of catalysis by computationally designed retroaldolase enzymes , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  David Baker,et al.  An exciting but challenging road ahead for computational enzyme design , 2010, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[10]  Richard A. Lerner,et al.  Erweiterung des Repertoires von katalytischen Antikörpern mit Aldolaseaktivität durch Kombination von reaktiver Immunisierung und Übergangszustandstheorie: neue Enantio‐ und Diastereoselektivitäten , 1999 .

[11]  Cameron Neylon,et al.  Chemical and biochemical strategies for the randomization of protein encoding DNA sequences: library construction methods for directed evolution. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[12]  Donald Hilvert,et al.  Design of protein catalysts. , 2013, Annual review of biochemistry.

[13]  R. Fuller,et al.  Development of small designer aldolase enzymes: catalytic activity, folding, and substrate specificity. , 2005, Biochemistry.

[14]  Daniel Herschlag,et al.  Robust design and optimization of retroaldol enzymes , 2012, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[15]  W. Stemmer.  DNA shuffling by random fragmentation and reassembly: in vitro recombination for molecular evolution. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  B List,et al.  Aldol sensors for the rapid generation of tunable fluorescence by antibody catalysis. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Rocco Moretti,et al.  Computational enzyme design. , 2013, Angewandte Chemie.

[18]  I. Beletskaya,et al.  Organocatalysis of asymmetric aldol reaction. Catalysts and reagents , 2009 .

[19]  Randy J. Read,et al.  Phaser crystallographic software , 2007, Journal of applied crystallography.

[20]  Eric A. Althoff,et al.  De Novo Computational Design of Retro-Aldol Enzymes , 2008, Science.

[21]  Matthew A. Windsor,et al.  A rationally designed aldolase foldamer. , 2009, Angewandte Chemie.

[22]  D. Goeddel,et al.  A method for random mutagenesis of a defined DNA segment using a modified polymerase chain reaction , 1989 .

[23]  Kevin Cowtan,et al.  research papers Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological , 2005 .

[24]  R. Lerner,et al.  Direct observation of an enamine intermediate in amine catalysis. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[25]  B. Oh,et al.  Mutational analysis of the three cysteines and active-site aspartic acid 103 of ketosteroid isomerase from Pseudomonas putida biotype B , 1997, Journal of bacteriology.

[26]  R. Lerner,et al.  Broadening the Aldolase Catalytic Antibody Repertoire by Combining Reactive Immunization and Transition State Theory: New Enantio- and Diastereoselectivities. , 1999, Angewandte Chemie.

[27]  David Baker,et al.  Comparison of designed and randomly generated catalysts for simple chemical reactions , 2012, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[28]  Randy J Read,et al.  Recent developments in the PHENIX software for automated crystallographic structure determination. , 2004, Journal of synchrotron radiation.

[29]  Jens Meiler,et al.  New algorithms and an in silico benchmark for computational enzyme design , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[30]  C. Orengo,et al.  One fold with many functions: the evolutionary relationships between TIM barrel families based on their sequences, structures and functions. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  David Baker,et al.  Evolution of a designed retro-aldolase leads to complete active site remodeling , 2013, Nature chemical biology.