Above‐ground biomass is driven by mass‐ratio effects and stand structural attributes in a temperate deciduous forest

Summary 1.Forest ecosystems are critical for the global regulation of carbon (C), a substantial portion of which is stored in aboveground biomass (AGB). While it is well understood that taxonomic and functional composition, stand structure, and environmental gradients influence spatial variation in AGB, the relative strengths of these drivers at landscape-scales has not been investigated in temperate forests. Furthermore, when biodiversity enhances C storage, it is unclear whether it is through mass-ratio effects (i.e., the dominant trait in communities regulates AGB) or through niche complementarity (i.e., increased AGB due to interspecific resource partitioning). 2.To address these mechanisms, we analyzed data from a census of 28,262 adult trees sampled across 900 ha of temperate deciduous forest in southwestern Pennsylvania. We used data on four key plant functional traits to determine if (1) there is a positive relationship between species diversity and AGB and (2) whether this is due to mass-ratio effects or niche complementarity. We also sought to (3) identify the physical stand structural attributes and topographic variables that influence AGB across this landscape. 3.We found AGB was positively related to species richness and negatively related to species evenness, albeit weakly, while functional diversity indices had neutral effects. AGB was enhanced in communities dominated by traits related to greater maximum tree height, deeper minimum rooting depths and larger seeds. Most importantly, areas with high AGB were dominated by Acer saccharum and Liriodendron tulipifera. Overall, these results support mass-ratio effects, with little evidence for niche complementarity. 4.Synthesis: Stand structure, topography, and species and functional composition, but not taxonomic or functional diversity, were found to be key drivers of AGB at landscape-scales (<900 ha) in this temperate deciduous forest. Our findings suggest that simultaneously managing for both high diversity and for aboveground C storage may prove challenging in some forest systems. Our results further indicate that the impact of tree biodiversity loss on aboveground C stocks will depend greatly on the identity of the species that are lost. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

[1]  Above-ground standing biomass and tree species diversity in natural stands of Central Europe , 2007 .

[2]  P. Kalisz.  Soil Properties of Steep Appalachian Old Fields , 1986 .

[3]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Historic Mining and Agriculture as Indicators of Occurrence and Abundance of Widespread Invasive Plant Species , 2015, PloS one.

[5]  Han Y. H. Chen,et al.  Individual size inequality links forest diversity and above‐ground biomass , 2015 .

[6]  P. Reich,et al.  Forest productivity increases with evenness, species richness and trait variation: a global meta‐analysis , 2012 .

[7]  G. Daily,et al.  Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity , 2012, Nature.

[8]  Nathan J B Kraft,et al.  Functional traits and the growth-mortality trade-off in tropical trees. , 2010, Ecology.

[9]  W. Post,et al.  North American carbon dioxide sources and sinks: magnitude, attribution, and uncertainty , 2012 .

[10]  R. Fahey,et al.  Quantifying canopy complexity and effects on productivity and resilience in late-successional hemlock-hardwood forests. , 2015, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[11]  J. Colbert,et al.  Aspect Induced Differences in Vegetation, Soil, and Microclimatic Characteristics of an Appalachian Watershed , 2004 .

[12]  L. Comita,et al.  Species associations structured by environment and land-use history promote beta-diversity in a temperate forest. , 2015, Ecology.

[13]  Development of an In Planta system to monitor phosphorus status by agroinfiltration and agroinjection , 2016, Plant and Soil.

[14]  J. Heys,et al.  The Distribution of Free Space and Its Relation to Canopy Composition at Six Forest Sites , 2004 .

[15]  G. Matlack,et al.  Agricultural history drives structure and tree species composition of second growth forest over 100 years in southeastern Ohio, USA , 2017 .

[16]  Jordi Vayreda,et al.  Species richness and wood production: a positive association in Mediterranean forests. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[17]  J. Marshall,et al.  Above- and below-ground production of trees and other vegetation on contrasting aspects in western Montana: a case study , 2001 .

[18]  R. Busing,et al.  Secondary Succession, Gap Dynamics, and Community Structure in a Southern Appalachian Cove Forest , 1989 .

[19]  C. Messier,et al.  Diversity increases carbon storage and tree productivity in Spanish forests , 2014 .

[20]  N. Swenson,et al.  Plant geography upon the basis of functional traits: an example from eastern North American trees. , 2010, Ecology.

[21]  A. Fichtner,et al.  Facilitative-Competitive Interactions in an Old-Growth Forest: The Importance of Large-Diameter Trees as Benefactors and Stimulators for Forest Community Assembly , 2015, PloS one.

[22]  YiChing Lin,et al.  Functional composition drives ecosystem function through multiple mechanisms in a broadleaved subtropical forest , 2016, Oecologia.

[23]  D. Mouillot,et al.  New multidimensional functional diversity indices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology. , 2008, Ecology.

[24]  S. Hamburg,et al.  Forest carbon storage: ecology, management, and policy , 2010 .

[25]  N. Nadkarni,et al.  Canopy Structure in a 650-Year Douglas-Fir Chronosequence in Western Washington: Distribution of Canopy Elements and Open Space , 2011 .

[26]  J. Bauhus,et al.  A Review of Processes Behind Diversity—Productivity Relationships in Forests , 2016, Current Forestry Reports.

[27]  X. Morin.  Species richness promotes canopy packing: a promising step towards a better understanding of the mechanisms driving the diversity effects on forest functioning , 2015 .

[28]  X. Mi,et al.  Traits of dominant tree species predict local scale variation in forest aboveground and topsoil carbon stocks , 2016, Plant and Soil.

[29]  N. Swenson,et al.  Functional beta‐diversity patterns reveal deterministic community assembly processes in eastern North American trees , 2013 .

[30]  D. Tilman,et al.  The Importance of Land-Use Legacies to Ecology and Conservation , 2003 .

[31]  Richard A. Birdsey,et al.  Comprehensive database of diameter-based biomass regressions for North American tree species , 2004 .

[32]  Hans Pretzsch,et al.  Effect of tree species mixing on the size structure, density, and yield of forest stands , 2015, European Journal of Forest Research.

[33]  C. Leuschner,et al.  Productivity of temperate broad-leaved forest stands differing in tree species diversity , 2010, Annals of Forest Science.

[34]  R. Boerner.  Unraveling the Gordian Knot: Interactions among vegetation, topography, and soil properties in the central and southern Appalachians , 2006 .

[35]  J. Bauhus,et al.  Structural diversity promotes productivity of mixed, uneven-aged forests in southwestern Germany , 2016, Oecologia.

[36]  C. M. Sharma,et al.  Variation in carbon stocks on different slope aspects in seven major forest types of temperate region of Garhwal Himalaya, India , 2011, Journal of Biosciences.

[37]  W. Carson,et al.  Historic disturbance regimes promote tree diversity only under low browsing regimes in eastern deciduous forest , 2013 .

[38]  P. Legendre,et al.  A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. , 2010, Ecology.

[39]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness , 2001 .

[40]  Olivier Bouriaud,et al.  Crown plasticity enables trees to optimize canopy packing in mixed-species forests , 2015 .

[41]  G. Bohrer,et al.  Maintaining high rates of carbon storage in old forests: A mechanism linking canopy structure to forest function , 2013 .

[42]  M. Loreau,et al.  Multiple metrics of diversity have different effects on temperate forest functioning over succession , 2016, Oecologia.

[43]  Christian Messier,et al.  Spatial complementarity in tree crowns explains overyielding in species mixtures , 2017, Nature Ecology &Evolution.

[44]  N. Erbilgin,et al.  Direction of interaction between mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) and resource-sharing wood-boring beetles depends on plant parasite infection , 2016, Oecologia.

[45]  C. Messier,et al.  The effect of biodiversity on tree productivity: from temperate to boreal forests , 2011 .

[46]  Sandra Díaz,et al.  Plant functional diversity and carbon storage – an empirical test in semi‐arid forest ecosystems , 2013 .

[47]  David Mouillot,et al.  Functional diversity measures: an overview of their redundancy and their ability to discriminate community assembly rules , 2010 .

[48]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects , 1998 .

[49]  P. Dimitrakopoulos,et al.  Biodiversity effects increase linearly with biotope space , 2004 .

[50]  Jingyun Fang,et al.  The relationship between species richness and biomass changes from boreal to subtropical forests in China , 2015 .

[51]  Henrik Andrén,et al.  Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species , 2013, Nature Communications.

[52]  Sandra Díaz,et al.  Does functional trait diversity predict above‐ground biomass and productivity of tropical forests? Testing three alternative hypotheses , 2015 .

[53]  G. Bohrer,et al.  The role of canopy structural complexity in wood net primary production of a maturing northern deciduous forest. , 2011, Ecology.

[54]  Nelson Nazzicari,et al.  Whole-Genome Analysis of Diversity and SNP-Major Gene Association in Peach Germplasm , 2015, PloS one.

[55]  David Kenfack,et al.  Scale‐dependent relationships between tree species richness and ecosystem function in forests , 2013 .

[56]  C. Lafon.  Stand dynamics of a yellow-poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera L.) forest in the Appalachian mountains, Virginia, USA , 2004 .

[57]  P. Balvanera,et al.  Diversity enhances carbon storage in tropical forests , 2015 .

[58]  Arshad Ali,et al.  Community-weighted mean of leaf traits and divergence of wood traits predict aboveground biomass in secondary subtropical forests. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[59]  J. Fox.  Interpreting the 'selection effect' of biodiversity on ecosystem function , 2005 .