Administration of propofol by target-controlled infusion in patients undergoing coronary artery surgery.

OBJECTIVES To study the predictive performance of a target-controlled infusion (TCI) system of propofol in patients undergoing coronary bypass graft (CABG) surgery, using a referenced pharmacokinetic set derived from healthy patients. Also, to determine the propofol concentrations required for clinically acceptable induction and maintenance of anesthesia when combined with midazolam as premedication and a continuous alfentanil infusion and to study the hemodynamic stability of this technique. DESIGN Prospective noncomparative study analysis. SETTING Operating room at a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS Twenty-on patients with good left ventricular function undergoing coronary artery surgery. INTERVENTIONS Patients were anesthetized using a continuous infusion of alfentanil (mean infusion rate: 1 microgram/kg/min) and propofol administered by TCI. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The predictive performance of the TCI system (212 arterial samples) was measured at specified time points before, during, and after bypass. The TCI system underestimated the measured blood propofol concentrations with a bias of +21.2% and +9.6% during the prebypass and the bypass periods, respectively. The predictive inaccuracy, expressed by the median absolute prediction error, was 23% and 18.5%, respectively. Mean target propofol concentrations required to induce and maintain anesthesia before bypass were 0.92 microgram/mL and 3.64 micrograms/mL, respectively. In the period during and after bypass, the mean target concentrations required to maintain anesthesia was 2.22 micrograms/mL. The administration of propofol by TCI was still associated with some short episodes of hemodynamic instability that were easily controlled by adjusting the target concentration in the majority of the patients. Therefore, the overall quality and ease of control of anesthesia were considered as being good or adequate. CONCLUSIONS In this group of patients undergoing CABG surgery, the TCI system used underestimated the measured propofol concentrations. However, the predictive performance of the selected mean pharmacokinetic parameters derived from healthy patients was acceptable during the whole surgical procedure.

[1]  E. J. Douglas,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of propofol (diprivan) in elderly patients. , 1988, British journal of anaesthesia.

[2]  J A Spain,et al.  Computer‐assisted Continuous Infusions of Fentanyl during Cardiac Anesthesia: Comparison with a Manual Method , 1985, Anesthesiology.

[3]  G. Plummer Improved method for the determination of propofol in blood by high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. , 1987, Journal of chromatography.

[4]  M. White,et al.  Assessment of the value and pattern of use of a target controlled propofol infusion system , 1993, International journal of clinical monitoring and computing.

[5]  K. Vermeyen,et al.  Propofol-fentanyl anaesthesia for coronary bypass surgery in patients with good left ventricular function. , 1987, British journal of anaesthesia.

[6]  J G Reves,et al.  Pharmacokinetic model-driven infusion of fentanyl: assessment of accuracy. , 1990, Anesthesiology.

[7]  F. Cantraine,et al.  Predictive accuracy of alfentanil infusion in coronary artery surgery: a prebypass study in middle-aged and elderly patients. , 1994, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[8]  R. Mirakhur,et al.  Propofol-fentanyl anesthesia: a comparison with isoflurane-fentanyl anesthesia in coronary artery bypass grafting and valve replacement surgery. , 1994, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[9]  J G Bovill,et al.  The Pharmacodynamic Interaction of Propofol and Alfentanil during Lower Abdominal Surgery in Women , 1995, Anesthesiology.

[10]  R. Feneck,et al.  Anaesthesia for myocardial revascularisation , 1992, Anaesthesia.

[11]  J. Glen,et al.  Pharmacokinetic model selection for target controlled infusions of propofol. Assessment of three parameter sets. , 1994 .

[12]  D R Stanski,et al.  EEG quantitation of narcotic effect: the comparative pharmacodynamics of fentanyl and alfentanil. , 1985, Anesthesiology.

[13]  P. Gordon,et al.  Total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and alfentanil for coronary artery bypass surgery. , 1994, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[14]  J. Glen,et al.  Pharmacokinetic Model Selection for Target Controlled Infusions of Propofol: Assessment of Three Parameter Sets , 1994, Anesthesiology.

[15]  P. Glass,et al.  Pharmacokinetic basis of intravenous drug delivery , 1991 .

[16]  P. Rosenberg,et al.  Propofol sequestration within the extracorporeal circuit , 1994, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[17]  M. White,et al.  A portable computerised infusion system for propofod , 1990, Anaesthesia.

[18]  R. Hall,et al.  A comparison of the myocardial metabolic and haemodynamic changes produced by propofol-sufentanil and enflurane-sufentanil anaesthesia for patients having coronary artery bypass graft surgery , 1991, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[19]  M. White,et al.  A portable target controlled propofol infusion system , 1992, International journal of clinical monitoring and computing.

[20]  A. Manara,et al.  Total i.v. anaesthesia with propofol and alfentanil for coronary artery bypass grafting. , 1991, British journal of anaesthesia.

[21]  N. Morton,et al.  Pharmacokinetic model driven infusion of propofol in children. , 1991, British journal of anaesthesia.