The PCORI Engagement Rubric: Promising Practices for Partnering in Research

PURPOSE Engaging patients, caregivers, and other health care stakeholders as partners in planning, conducting, and disseminating research is a promising way to improve clinical decision making and outcomes. Many researchers, patients, and other stakeholders, however, lack clarity about when and how to engage as partners within the clinical research process. To address the need for guidance on creating meaningful stakeholder partnerships in patient-centered clinical comparative effectiveness research, the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) developed the PCORI Engagement Rubric (Rubric). METHODS PCORI developed the Rubric drawing from a synthesis of the literature, a qualitative study with patients, a targeted review of engagement plans from PCORI-funded project applications, and a moderated discussion and review with PCORI’s Advisory Panel on Patient Engagement. RESULTS The Rubric provides a framework for operationalizing engagement to incorporate patients and other stakeholders in all phases of research. It includes: principles of engagement; definitions of stakeholder types; key considerations for planning, conducting, and disseminating engaged research; potential engagement activities; and examples of promising practices from PCORI-funded projects. CONCLUSIONS PCORI designed the Rubric to illustrate opportunities for engagement to researchers interested in applying for PCORI funding and to patients and other stakeholders interested in greater involvement in research. By encouraging PCORI applicants, awardees, and others to apply the rubric, PCORI hopes to shift the research paradigm from one of conducting research on patients as subjects to a pursuit carried out in collaboration with patients and other stakeholders to better reflect the values, preferences, and outcomes that matter to the patient community.

[1]  F. Baum,et al.  Participatory action research , 2006, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

[2]  Michael F Dulin,et al.  Use of community-based participatory research in primary care to improve healthcare outcomes and disparities in care. , 2013, Journal of comparative effectiveness research.

[3]  J. Westfall,et al.  A GUIDED TOUR OF COMMUNITY-BASED PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH: AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY , 2007, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[4]  A. Palermo,et al.  Community engagement in research: frameworks for education and peer review. , 2010, American journal of public health.

[5]  L. Forsythe,et al.  Conceptual and practical foundations of patient engagement in research at the patient-centered outcomes research institute , 2015, Quality of Life Research.

[6]  Jeremy Vetter,et al.  Introduction: Lay Participation in the History of Scientific Observation , 2011, Science in Context.

[7]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[8]  Emily Moore,et al.  Evaluating patient and stakeholder engagement in research: moving from theory to practice. , 2015, Journal of comparative effectiveness research.

[9]  J. Sloan,et al.  Patient engagement in research: a systematic review , 2014, BMC Health Services Research.

[10]  Jill Sage,et al.  The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. , 2014, Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons.

[11]  Chair,et al.  Responsible Research with Communities : Participatory Research in Primary Care , 2003 .

[12]  Clem Adelman,et al.  Kurt Lewin and the Origins of Action Research , 1993 .

[13]  S. Staniszewska,et al.  Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review , 2014, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.