Door‐In–Door‐Out Time Effect on Clinical Outcome According to Reperfusion Time in Endovascular Treatment

Door‐in–door‐out time (DIDO) in nonthrombectomy stroke centers is a key performance indicator in acute stroke care. Nonetheless, the relative importance of DIDO on outcome in patients transferred for endovascular treatment (EVT) is not widely known. Therefore, we aim to explore the association between DIDO and clinical outcome according to onset to reperfusion time in patients undergoing EVT. Observational multicenter study including patients transferred to a thrombectomy‐capable center from a local stroke center who underwent thrombectomy. The primary outcome was favorable clinical outcome, as evaluated by a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 at 3 months. We evaluated the association between DIDO and clinical outcome according to onset to reperfusion time and factors related to shorter DIDO time. Among 2710 patients transferred for thrombectomy evaluation, 970 (43.8%) patients received EVT. Median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and DIDO time were 12 (interquartile range [IQR], 6–19) and 83 minutes (IQR, 66–108), respectively. Among patients undergoing EVT, no association was found between DIDO and clinical outcome. Considering only patients treated in the early time window (onset to reperfusion time ≤240 minutes), patients with favorable outcome had a shorter DIDO (60 [IQR, 52–68] versus 73 [IQR, 61–83] minutes; P =0.013). A receiver operating characteristic curve identified a cutoff of 67 minutes of DIDO time that better predicted favorable outcome (sensitivity, 70%; specificity, 73%; area under the curve, 0.741). A multivariate analysis showed that DIDO ≤67 minutes emerged as an independent factor associated with favorable outcome (odds ratio [OR], 5.29 [95% CI, 1.38–20.27]; P =0.015). Door to computed tomography time was the only factor associated with DIDO ≤67 minutes (OR, 1.113 [95% CI, 1.018–1.261]; P =0.022) in a multivariate analysis in this time frame. In transferred patients undergoing EVT, DIDO has a significant impact on clinical outcome, mainly in the first hours from stroke onset. A benchmark of 67 minutes in DIDO time is proposed. Shorter door to computed tomography time appears to be an independent factor associated to achieve DIDO time ≤67 minutes. Measures to optimize workflow into referral centers are warranted.

[1]  D. Yavagal,et al.  Standardized Reporting of Workflow Metrics in Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment: Why and How? , 2021, Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology.

[2]  R. Mikulík,et al.  Stroke 20 20: Implementation goals for intravenous thrombolysis , 2021, European stroke journal.

[3]  C. Molina,et al.  Clinical and neuroimaging criteria to improve the workflow in transfers for endovascular treatment evaluation , 2020, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[4]  A. Bonafe,et al.  Shortening time to reperfusion after transfer from a primary to a comprehensive stroke center. , 2019, Neurology. Clinical practice.

[5]  A. Demchuk,et al.  Association of Time From Stroke Onset to Groin Puncture With Quality of Reperfusion After Mechanical Thrombectomy: A Meta-analysis of Individual Patient Data From 7 Randomized Clinical Trials , 2019, JAMA neurology.

[6]  Götz Thomalla,et al.  Highest Lesion Growth Rates in Patients With Hyperacute Stroke: When Time Is Brain Particularly Matters , 2019, Stroke.

[7]  P. Cardona,et al.  Revalidation of the RACE scale after its regional implementation in Catalonia: a triage tool for large vessel occlusion , 2018, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[8]  Noreen Kamal,et al.  Modeling Stroke Patient Transport for All Patients With Suspected Large-Vessel Occlusion , 2018, JAMA neurology.

[9]  G. Santo,et al.  Recommendations on telestroke in Europe , 2018, European stroke journal.

[10]  K. Furie,et al.  Association of a Primary Stroke Center Protocol for Suspected Stroke by Large-Vessel Occlusion With Efficiency of Care and Patient Outcomes , 2017, JAMA neurology.

[11]  T. Wijeratne,et al.  Deconstruction of Interhospital Transfer Workflow in Large Vessel Occlusion: Real-World Data in the Thrombectomy Era , 2017, Stroke.

[12]  E. López‐Cancio,et al.  Endovascular treatment improves cognition after stroke , 2017, Neurology.

[13]  Adnan H Siddiqui,et al.  Time to Treatment With Endovascular Thrombectomy and Outcomes From Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-analysis. , 2016, JAMA.

[14]  Thomas V. Kodankandath,et al.  Poor Hypertension Control and Longer Transport Times Are Associated with Worse Outcome in Drip-and-Ship Stroke Patients. , 2016, Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association.

[15]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Association of door-in to door-out time with reperfusion delays and outcomes among patients transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2011, JAMA.

[16]  Noreen Kamal,et al.  Drip ‘n Ship Versus Mothership for Endovascular Treatment: Modeling the Best Transportation Options for Optimal Outcomes , 2017, Stroke.