An Individual-centric Probabilistic Extension for OWL: Modelling the Uncertainness

The theoretical benefits of semantics as well as their potential impact on IT are well known concepts, extensively discussed in literature. As more and more systems are currently using or referring semantic technologies, the challenging third version of the web (Semantic Web or Web 3.0) is progressively taking shape. On the other hand, apart from the relatively limited capabilities in terms of expressiveness characterizing current concrete semantic technologies, theoretical models and research prototypes are actually overlooking a significant number of practical issues including, among others, consolidated mechanisms to manage and maintain vocabularies, shared notations systems and support to high scale systems (Big Data). Focusing on the OWL model as the current reference technology to specify web semantics, in this paper we will discuss the problem of approaching the knowledge engineering exclusively according to a deterministic model and excluding a priori any kind of probabilistic semantic. Those limitations determine that most knowledge ecosystems including, at some level, probabilistic information are not well suited inside OWL environments. Therefore, despite the big potential of OWL, a consistent number of applications are still using more classic data models or unnatural hybrid environments. But OWL, even with its intrinsic limitations, reflects a model flexible enough to support extensions and integrations. In this work we propose a simple statistical extension for the model that can significantly spread the expressiveness and the purpose of OWL.

[1]  Paulo Cesar G. da Costa,et al.  PR-OWL: A Framework for Probabilistic Ontologies , 2006, FOIS.

[2]  Norbert Fuhr,et al.  Adding Probabilities and Rules to Owl Lite Subsets Based on Probabilistic Datalog , 2006, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[3]  Robert Amor,et al.  Semantic geographic space: from Big Data to ecosystems of data , 2015 .

[4]  Yun Peng,et al.  A probabilistic extension to ontology language OWL , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[5]  Wei-Ying Ma,et al.  A probabilistic semantic model for image annotation and multi-modal image retrieval , 2005, Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'05) Volume 1.

[6]  Pavel Klinov,et al.  Pronto: Probabilistic Ontological Modeling in the Semantic Web , 2008, International Semantic Web Conference.

[7]  Paulo Cesar G. da Costa,et al.  PR-OWL 2.0 - Bridging the gap to OWL semantics , 2010, URSW.

[8]  Robert Amor,et al.  MANSION-GS: seMANtics as the n-th dimenSION for Geographic Space , 2014, CONF-IRM.

[9]  Zoran Majkic,et al.  Probabilistic RDF , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse & Integration.

[10]  Ck Cheng,et al.  The Age of Big Data , 2015 .

[11]  Huajun Chen,et al.  The Semantic Web , 2011, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[12]  Jan Nößner,et al.  ELOG: A Probabilistic Reasoner for OWL EL , 2011, RR.

[13]  Vicente Traver,et al.  When the Social Meets the Semantic: Social Semantic Web or Web 2.5 , 2012, Future Internet.

[14]  R. Doyle The American terrorist. , 2001, Scientific American.

[15]  Deborah L. McGuinness,et al.  OWL Web ontology language overview , 2004 .

[16]  Anuj R. Jaiswal,et al.  OMEN: A Probabilistic Ontology Mapping Tool , 2005, SEMWEB.

[17]  David L. Martin,et al.  Semantic Web Services , 2012, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[18]  Gonzalo Navarro,et al.  Spaces, Trees, and Colors , 2013, ACM Comput. Surv..

[19]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  The Semantic Web: The Roles of XML and RDF , 2000, IEEE Internet Comput..

[20]  Robert Amor,et al.  Addressing Semantic Geographic Information Systems , 2013, Future Internet.

[21]  Robert Amor,et al.  Modelling Metropolitan Activity through Abductive Reasoning on Geographic Space , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology.