The Value of Openness in Scientific Problem Solving

Working papers are in draft form. This working paper is distributed for purposes of comment and discussion only. It may not be reproduced without permission of the copyright holder. Copies of working papers are available from the author. Abstract Openness and free information sharing amongst scientists are supposed to be core norms of the scientific community. However, many studies have shown that these norms are not universally followed. Lack of openness and transparency means that scientific problem solving is constrained to a few scientists who work in secret and who typically fail to leverage the entire accumulation of scientific knowledge available. We present evidence of the efficacy of problem solving when disclosing problem information. The method's application to 166 discrete scientific problems from the research laboratories of 26 firms is illustrated. Problems were disclosed to over 80,000 independent scientists from over 150 countries. We show that disclosure of problem information to a large group of outside solvers is an effective means of solving scientific problems. The approach solved one-third of a sample of problems that large and well-known R & D-intensive firms had been unsuccessful in solving internally. Problem-solving success was found to be associated with the ability to attract specialized solvers with range of diverse scientific interests. Furthermore, successful solvers solved problems at the boundary or outside of their fields of expertise, indicating a transfer of knowledge from one field to others.

[1]  F. Hayek The economic nature of the firm: The use of knowledge in society , 1945 .

[2]  W. Heisenberg Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science , 1958 .

[3]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[4]  H. Simon,et al.  Computer simulation of human thinking and problem solving. , 1962, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[5]  R. Merton,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1975, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion.

[6]  W. Hagstrom Competition in Science , 1974 .

[7]  Norman Kaplan,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1974 .

[8]  Michael Mulkay,et al.  Three Models of Scientific Development , 1975 .

[9]  R. Merton,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations.@@@Einstein and the Generations of Science. , 1976 .

[10]  D. Chubin State of the Field The Conceptualization of Scientific Specialties , 1976 .

[11]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Striking the Mother Lode in Science: The Importance of Age, Place, and Time, , 1994 .

[12]  E. Hippel Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[13]  H. Simon,et al.  Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning , 1991 .

[14]  B. Frey Not Just for the Money: An Economic Theory of Personal Motivation , 1998 .

[15]  E. Deci,et al.  A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  Scott E. Page,et al.  Problem Solving by Heterogeneous Agents , 2001, J. Econ. Theory.

[17]  J. S. Long,et al.  Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata, 2nd Edition , 2005 .

[18]  Kim Bartel Sheehan,et al.  E-mail Survey Response Rates: A Review , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[19]  S. Hilgartner,et al.  Data withholding in academic genetics: evidence from a national survey. , 2002, JAMA.

[20]  Lawrence Lessig,et al.  The future of ideas - the fate of the commons in a connected world , 2002 .

[21]  Wei Hong,et al.  Secrecy is increasing in step with competition , 2003, Nature.

[22]  Y. Benkler Commons-Based Strategies and the Problems of Patents , 2004, Science.

[23]  Jeremy M. Grushcow,et al.  Measuring Secrecy: A Cost of the Patent System Revealed , 2004, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[24]  Lu Hong,et al.  Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Ned Gulley,et al.  In praise of tweaking: a wiki-like programming contest , 2004, INTR.

[26]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software , 2005 .

[27]  Gevorg Grigoryan,et al.  Coarse-graining protein energetics in sequence variables. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[28]  J. Giles Internet encyclopaedias go head to head , 2005, Nature.

[29]  John Cullen,et al.  Democratizing Innovation , 2020, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.