How do fire ants control the rheology of their aggregations? A statistical mechanics approach

Active networks are omnipresent in nature, from the molecular to the macro-scale. In this study, we explore the mechanical behaviour of fire ant aggregations, closely knit swarms that display impressive dynamics culminating with the aggregations’ capacity to self-heal and adapt to the environment. Although the combined elasticity and rheology of the ant aggregation can be characterized by phenomenological mechanical models (e.g. linear Maxwell or Kelvin–Voigt model), it is not clear how the behaviour of individual ants affects the aggregations’ emerging responses. Here, we explore an alternative way to think about these materials, describing them as a collection of individuals connected via elastic chains that associate and dissociate over time. Using our knowledge of these connections—e.g. their elasticity and attachment/dissociation rates—we construct a statistical description of connection stretch and derive an evolution equation for the corresponding stretch distribution. This time-evolving stretch distribution is then used to determine important macroscopic measures, e.g. stress, energy storage and energy dissipation, in the network. In this context, we show how the physical characteristics and activities of individual ants can explain the elasticity, flow and shear thinning of the aggregation. In particular, we find that experimental results are matched if the detachment rate between two individuals increases with tension in the connection.

[1]  F. Vernerey,et al.  A coupled Eulerian–Lagrangian extended finite element formulation for simulating large deformations in hyperelastic media with moving free boundaries , 2015 .

[2]  Nathan J. Mlot,et al.  Fire ants self-assemble into waterproof rafts to survive floods , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  I. Couzin,et al.  Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  Craig W. Reynolds Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[5]  M. P. Stoykovich,et al.  Remotely Triggered Locomotion of Hydrogel Mag-bots in Confined Spaces , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[6]  E. Bonabeau,et al.  Model of droplet dynamics in the Argentine ant Linepithema humile (Mayr) , 2001, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[7]  Mary C. Boyce,et al.  Deformation of Elastomeric Networks: Relation between Molecular Level Deformation and Classical Statistical Mechanics Models of Rubber Elasticity , 2001 .

[8]  F. Vernerey Transient response of nonlinear polymer networks: A kinetic theory. , 2018, Journal of the mechanics and physics of solids.

[9]  S. Rakshit,et al.  Biomechanics of cell adhesion: how force regulates the lifetime of adhesive bonds at the single molecule level. , 2014, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[10]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Cockroach aggregation based on strain odour recognition , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  S. Rakshit,et al.  Ideal, catch, and slip bonds in cadherin adhesion , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Spontaneously ordered motion of self-propelled particles , 1997, cond-mat/0611741.

[13]  S. Bryant,et al.  Tuning tissue growth with scaffold degradation in enzyme-sensitive hydrogels: a mathematical model. , 2016, Soft matter.

[14]  P. Hänggi,et al.  Reaction-rate theory: fifty years after Kramers , 1990 .

[15]  H. Chaté,et al.  Collective motion of self-propelled particles interacting without cohesion. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[16]  E. Altshuler,et al.  Entangled active matter: From cells to ants , 2016 .

[17]  Tarek I. Zohdi,et al.  Mechanistic modeling of swarms , 2009 .

[18]  Tarek I. Zohdi,et al.  An agent-based computational framework for simulation of competing hostile planet-wide populations , 2017 .

[19]  David Hu,et al.  Mechanics of fire ant aggregations. , 2016, Nature materials.

[20]  F. Vernerey,et al.  Statistical Damage Mechanics of Polymer Networks. , 2018, Macromolecules.

[21]  Radhika Nagpal,et al.  Designing Collective Behavior in a Termite-Inspired Robot Construction Team , 2014, Science.

[22]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Collective Motion , 1999, physics/9902023.

[23]  Sachit Butail,et al.  Zebrafish response to 3D printed shoals of conspecifics: the effect of body size , 2016, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[24]  F. Vernerey,et al.  The Chain Distribution Tensor: Linking Nonlinear Rheology and Chain Anisotropy in Transient Polymers , 2018, Polymers.

[25]  P. Hogeweg,et al.  Modelling Morphogenesis: From Single Cells to Crawling Slugs. , 1997, Journal of theoretical biology.

[26]  F. Vernerey,et al.  Computational modeling of the large deformation and flow of viscoelastic polymers , 2018, Computational mechanics.

[27]  Massimo Fornasier,et al.  Particle, kinetic, and hydrodynamic models of swarming , 2010 .

[28]  Nathan J. Mlot,et al.  Fire ants perpetually rebuild sinking towers , 2017, Royal Society Open Science.

[29]  F. Vernerey,et al.  The mechanics of hydrogel crawlers in confined environment , 2017, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[30]  F. Tanaka,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of physically crosslinked networks: Part 2. Dynamic mechanical moduli , 1992 .

[31]  D C Krakauer,et al.  Spatial scales of desert locust gregarization. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  P. Nott,et al.  The collective dynamics of self-propelled particles , 2007, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[33]  T. Indei Necessary conditions for shear thickening in associating polymer networks , 2007 .

[34]  Vicsek,et al.  Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[35]  A. Bertozzi,et al.  Self-propelled particles with soft-core interactions: patterns, stability, and collapse. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[36]  Radhika Nagpal,et al.  Programmable self-assembly in a thousand-robot swarm , 2014, Science.

[37]  S. Bryant,et al.  Heterogeneity is key to hydrogel-based cartilage tissue regeneration. , 2017, Soft matter.

[38]  A. Fernández-Nieves,et al.  Activity-driven changes in the mechanical properties of fire ant aggregations. , 2017, Physical review. E.

[39]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Simulating dynamical features of escape panic , 2000, Nature.

[40]  F. Vernerey,et al.  Role of catch bonds in actomyosin mechanics and cell mechanosensitivity. , 2016, Physical review. E.

[41]  Tarek I. Zohdi,et al.  Computational design of swarms , 2003 .

[42]  F. Vernerey,et al.  A statistically-based continuum theory for polymers with transient networks , 2017 .

[43]  Paul C Foster,et al.  Fire ants actively control spacing and orientation within self-assemblages , 2014, Journal of Experimental Biology.