The Effects of Higher Levels of Immersion on Procedure Memorization Performance and Implications for Educational Virtual Environments

Researchers have proposed that immersion could have advantages for tasks involving abstract mental activities, such as conceptual learning; however, there are few empirical results that support this idea. We hypothesized that higher levels of immersion would benefit such tasks if the mental activity could be mapped to objects or locations in a 3D environment. To investigate this hypothesis, we performed an experiment in which participants memorized procedures in a virtual environment and then attempted to recall those procedures. We aimed to understand the effects of three components of immersion on performance. The results demonstrate that a matched software field of view (SFOV), a higher physical field of view (FOV), and a higher field of regard (FOR) all contributed to more effective memorization. The best performance was achieved with a matched SFOV and either a high FOV or a high FOR, or both. In addition, our experiment demonstrated that memorization in a virtual environment could be transferred to the real world. The results suggest that, for procedure memorization tasks, increasing the level of immersion even to moderate levels, such as those found in head mounted displays (HMDs) and display walls, can improve performance significantly compared to lower levels of immersion. Hypothesizing that the performance improvements provided by higher levels of immersion can be attributed to enhanced spatial cues, we discuss the values and limitations of supplementing conceptual information with spatial information in educational VR.

[1]  Frederick P. Brooks What's Real About Virtual Reality? , 1999, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[2]  R. L. Cohen Memory for action events: The power of enactment , 1989 .

[3]  Kyle Johnsen,et al.  Experiences in using immersive virtual characters to educate medical communication skills , 2005, IEEE Proceedings. VR 2005. Virtual Reality, 2005..

[4]  George Papagiannakis,et al.  Immersive VR decision training: telling interactive stories featuring advanced virtual human simulation technologies , 2003 .

[5]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  Virtual Reality: How Much Immersion Is Enough? , 2007, Computer.

[6]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Locomotion Mode Affects the Updating of Objects Encountered During Travel: The Contribution of Vestibular and Proprioceptive Inputs to Path Integration , 1998, Presence.

[7]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  The Educational Value of an Information-Rich Virtual Environment , 1999, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[8]  Endre M. Lidal,et al.  A Decade of Increased Oil Recovery in Virtual Reality , 2007, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[9]  Jim X. Chen,et al.  A Model for Understanding How Virtual Reality Aids Complex Conceptual Learning , 1999, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[10]  Stellan Ohlsson,et al.  Exploring multiple representations in elementary school science education , 2001, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality 2001.

[11]  Benjamin Lok,et al.  A Mixed Reality Approach for Merging Abstract and Concrete Knowledge , 2008, 2008 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference.

[12]  Dennis Proffitt,et al.  Quantifying immersion in virtual reality , 1997, SIGGRAPH.

[13]  Colin Ware,et al.  Reevaluating stereo and motion cues for visualizing graphs in three dimensions , 2005, APGV '05.

[14]  John T. Kelso,et al.  DIVERSE: A Framework for Building Extensible and Reconfigurable Device-Independent Virtual Environments and Distributed Asynchronous Simulations , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[15]  Eric D. Ragan,et al.  Higher Levels of Immersion Improve Procedure Memorization Performance , 2009, EGVE/ICAT/EuroVR.

[16]  Katerina Mania,et al.  The Effect of Memory Schemas on Object Recognition in Virtual Environments , 2005, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[17]  Mel Slater,et al.  A note on presence terminology , 2003 .

[18]  B. Bloom Taxonomy of educational objectives , 1956 .

[19]  S. Botden,et al.  Augmented versus Virtual Reality Laparoscopic Simulation: What Is the Difference? , 2007, World journal of surgery.

[20]  Stephen M. Hess,et al.  The Utility of Display Space in Keeping Track of Rapidly Changing Information , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[21]  W. Lewis Johnson,et al.  Steve: an animated pedagogical agent for procedural training in virtual environments , 1997, SGAR.

[22]  Joseph J. LaViola,et al.  Immersive VR for Scientific Visualization: A Progress Report , 2000, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[23]  Christina Vasilakis,et al.  Learning and Building Together in an Immersive Virtual World , 1999, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[24]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[25]  Kellogg S. Booth,et al.  Fish tank virtual reality , 1993, INTERCHI.

[26]  C D Wickens,et al.  Codes and Modalities in Multiple Resources: A Success and a Qualification , 1988, Human factors.

[27]  Robert H. Logie,et al.  Processing and Storage in Working Memory Span , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[28]  Dieter Schmalstieg,et al.  Construct3D: A Virtual Reality Application for Mathematics and Geometry Education , 2000, Education and Information Technologies.

[29]  Howard Rheingold,et al.  Virtual Reality , 1991 .

[30]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  Quantifying the benefits of immersion for procedural training , 2008, IPT/EDT '08.

[31]  W. Barfield,et al.  Visualizing the structure of virtual objects using head tracked stereoscopic displays , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE 1997 Annual International Symposium on Virtual Reality.

[32]  Giti Javidi,et al.  Virtual Reality and Education , 1999 .

[33]  M. D’Esposito Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[34]  Chris Dede,et al.  Multisensory Immersion as a Modeling Environment for Learning Complex Scientific Concepts , 1999 .

[35]  Katerina Mania,et al.  Fidelity Metrics for Virtual Environment Simulations Based on Spatial Memory Awareness States , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[36]  Mary M. Kennedy,et al.  Approximations to Indicators of Student Outcomes , 1999 .

[37]  E. A. Attree,et al.  The specificity of memory enhancement during interaction with a virtual environment. , 1999, Memory.

[38]  Larry F. Hodges,et al.  Virtual reality for education? , 2000, VRST '00.

[39]  Carolina Cruz-Neira,et al.  The benefits of statistical visualization in an immersive environment , 1999, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality (Cat. No. 99CB36316).

[40]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  The benefits of immersion for spatial understanding of complex underground cave systems , 2007, VRST '07.

[41]  K Anders Ericsson Exceptional memorizers: made, not born. , 2003, Trends in cognitive sciences.

[42]  Marilyn C. Salzman,et al.  ScienceSpace: virtual realities for learning complex and abstract scientific concepts , 1996, Proceedings of the IEEE 1996 Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium.

[43]  Maria Roussou,et al.  The virtual playground: an educational virtual reality environment for evaluating interactivity and conceptual learning , 2006, Virtual Reality.

[44]  D. Krathwohl A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview , 2002 .