Statistical Approximations for Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: The Problem of Size

Despite the steady increase of computing power and speed, the complexity of many of today's engineering analysis codes seems to keep pace with computing advances. Furthermore, the design and development of complex systems typically requires the integration of multiple disciplines and the resolution of multiple conflicting objectives. A departure from the traditional parametric design analysis and singleobjective optimization approaches is necessary for the effective solution of multidisciplinary, multiobjective complex design problems that rely on computer analyses. Statistical design of experiments and response surface modeling have been used extensively to create inexpensive-to-run approximations of expensive-to-run computer analyses and combat the problem of size associated with large, multidisciplinary design problems. However, these statistical approaches also break down because of the curse of dimensionality, wherein the number of design variables becomes too large to build accurate response surfaces efficiently. Speculations have been offered in the literature regarding the manageable problem size when these approaches are employed. In this paper, the limitations of these approaches are investigated and demonstrated explicitly by pushing the limits in a large-scale design problem. The design of a high-speed civil transport aircraft wing is used to illustrate 1) the use of these statistical techniques to facilitate multidisciplinary design optimization and 2) the resulting curse of dimensionality associated with large variable design problems. Our current research efforts in system partitioning and hierarchical modeling, and kriging (an alternative statistical approximation technique) are discussed as remedies for the problem of size.

[1]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data. , 1992 .

[2]  John E. Renaud,et al.  Concurrent Subspace Optimization Using Design Variable Sharing in a Distributed Computing Environment , 1996 .

[3]  Patrick N. Koch,et al.  Hierarchical modeling and robust synthesis for the preliminary design of large scale complex systems , 1997 .

[4]  Madhan Shridhar Phadke,et al.  Quality Engineering Using Robust Design , 1989 .

[5]  John E. Dennis,et al.  Problem Formulation for Multidisciplinary Optimization , 1994, SIAM J. Optim..

[6]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  On the Use of Statistics in Design and the Implications for Deterministic Computer Experiments , 1997 .

[7]  Timothy M. Mauery,et al.  COMPARISON OF RESPONSE SURFACE AND KRIGING MODELS FOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGN OPTIMIZATION , 1998 .

[8]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  THE COMPROMISE DECISION SUPPORT PROBLEM AND THE ADAPTIVE LINEAR PROGRAMMING ALGORITHM , 1998 .

[9]  Henry P. Wynn,et al.  Screening, predicting, and computer experiments , 1992 .

[10]  Donald R. Houser,et al.  A Procedure Using Manufacturing Variance to Design Gears With Minimum Transmission Error , 1991 .

[11]  Andrew Booker,et al.  Design and analysis of computer experiments , 1998 .

[12]  B. Grossman,et al.  Variable-complexity response surface approximations for wing structural weight in HSCT design , 1996 .

[13]  Singiresu S Rao,et al.  Robust optimization approach using Taguchi's loss function for solving nonlinear optimization problems , 1991, DAC 1991.

[14]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[15]  Richard J. Balling,et al.  Execution of Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Approaches on Common Test Problems , 1997 .

[16]  Peter R. Nelson,et al.  Design and Analysis of Experiments, 3rd Ed. , 1991 .

[17]  Bernard Grossman,et al.  Noisy Aerodynamic Response and Smooth Approximations in HSCT Design , 1994 .

[18]  James Ignizio,et al.  Introduction to Linear Goal Programming , 1985 .

[19]  Art B. Owen,et al.  9 Computer experiments , 1996, Design and analysis of experiments.

[20]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Aircraft design using collaborative optimization , 1996 .

[21]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  The other side of multidisciplinary design optimization: Accomodating a multiobjective, uncertain and non-deterministic world , 1998 .

[22]  Mike Rees,et al.  5. Statistics for Spatial Data , 1993 .

[23]  John E. Renaud,et al.  Multiobjective Collaborative Optimization , 1997 .

[24]  Wei Chen,et al.  A CONCEPT EXPLORATION METHOD FOR DETERMINING ROBUST TOP-LEVEL SPECIFICATIONS , 1996 .

[25]  Russell R. Barton,et al.  Metamodels for simulation input-output relations , 1992, WSC '92.

[26]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization - Survey of recent developments , 1996 .

[27]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  THE PROBLEM OF SIZE IN ROBUST DESIGN , 1997 .