Six Sigma: From a Goal-Theoretic Perspective to Shared-Vision Development

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to extend understanding of the success of the six sigma quality management initiative by investigating the effects of six sigma teamwork and statistical process control (SPC) on organizational‐shared vision.Design/methodology/approach – The information used comes from a larger study, the data for which were collected from a random sample of 237 European firms. Of these 237 organizations, 58 have implemented six sigma. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was used to test the hypotheses.Findings – The main findings show that six sigma teamwork and SPC positively affect the development of organizational‐shared vision. A positive but not significant influence is also observed between shared vision and organizational performance.Research limitations/implications – Positive effects found in this study should be investigated further employing a larger sample of six sigma firms and including other variables such as organizational learning. Further, the effects of these varia...

[1]  Eric L. Lesser,et al.  Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks , 2003 .

[2]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  Six sigma: A goal-theoretic perspective , 2003 .

[3]  J. Ravichandran.  Six-Sigma Milestone: An Overall Sigma Level of an Organization , 2006 .

[4]  M. E. Tubbs,et al.  Goal setting: A meta-analytic examination of the empirical evidence. , 1986 .

[5]  Kai Yang,et al.  Design for Six Sigma , 2005 .

[6]  Mark A. Toleman,et al.  The IS-business relationship and its implications for performance: An empirical study of South African and Australian organisations , 2006, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[7]  K. Jöreskog,et al.  LISREL-PC and PRELIS [Computer Software]@@@EQS/PC [Computer Software] , 1987 .

[8]  S. Harris,et al.  Vision salience and strategic involvement: implications for psychological attachment to organization and job , 1994 .

[9]  Allison W. Pearson,et al.  Top management team process, shared leadership, and new venture performance: A theoretical model and research agenda. , 2003 .

[10]  Michael D. Ensley,et al.  A reciprocal and longitudinal investigation of the innovation process: the central role of shared vision in product and process innovation teams (PPITs) , 2004 .

[11]  Sunil Thawani,et al.  Six Sigma—Strategy for Organizational Excellence , 2004 .

[12]  E. V. Gijo,et al.  Six Sigma implementation – Hurdles and more hurdles , 2005 .

[13]  A. Bertoncelj,et al.  Providing the Success of Six Sigma by Proper Project Identification and Selection: Comparison Study between Slovenia and the UK , 2010 .

[14]  Maneesh Kumar,et al.  Six sigma in service organisations: Benefits, challenges and difficulties, common myths, empirical observations and success factors , 2007 .

[15]  W. J. Parker,et al.  Management practices and productive performance country sheep farms , 1986 .

[16]  Not Specified,et al.  Six sigma for green belts and champions: foundations, dmaic, tools, cases, and certification , 2004 .

[17]  Sanjay L. Ahire,et al.  Development and Validation of TQM Implementation Constructs , 1996 .

[18]  Francisco Javier Lloréns Montes,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of organizational innovation and organizational learning in entrepreneurship , 2006, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[19]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  The origins of vision , 2002 .

[20]  J. Katzenbach,et al.  The myth of the top management team. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[21]  W. J. Hill,et al.  The Impact of Six Sigma Improvement—A Glimpse into the Future of Statistics , 1999 .

[22]  Henry L. Tosi.  A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance , 1991 .

[23]  Nancy Page Cooper,et al.  Do teams and Six Sigma go together , 2003 .

[24]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes. , 1996 .

[25]  K. Wright,et al.  The Role of Communication in Achieving Shared Vision Under New Organizational Leadership , 1998 .

[26]  Navin Shamji Dedhia.  Six sigma basics , 2005 .

[27]  J. Dean,et al.  MANAGEMENT THEORY AND TOTAL QUALITY: IMPROVING RESEARCH AND PRACTICE THROUGH THEORY DEVELOPMENT , 1994 .

[28]  J. Levine,et al.  Progress in Small Group Research , 1990 .

[29]  Jeroen de Mast,et al.  Six Sigma and competitive advantage , 2006 .

[30]  K. Tsui,et al.  Impact of Six Sigma implementation on stock price performance , 2003 .

[31]  Donald C. Hambrick,et al.  Corporate coherence and the TOP management team , 1997 .

[32]  Jiju Antony,et al.  Going from six sigma to design for six sigma: an exploratory study using analytic hierarchy process , 2003 .

[33]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  Relationship Between JIT and TQM: Practices and Performance , 1995 .

[34]  Geert Van Hootegem,et al.  The sustainability of teamwork under changing circumstances: The case of Volvo‐Ghent , 2004 .

[35]  Christian N. Madu,et al.  Customer‐centric six sigma quality and reliability management , 2003 .

[36]  Tobias Schoenherr,et al.  Assessing the Effectiveness of Quality Management in a Global Context , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[37]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks , 1998 .

[38]  Forrest W. Iii Breyfogle.  Implementing Six Sigma: Smarter Solutions Using Statistical Methods , 1999 .

[39]  Barbara B. Flynn,et al.  Relationship Between JIT and TQM: Practices and Performance , 1995 .

[40]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  Six sigma: The role of goals in improvement teams , 2006 .

[41]  Forrest B. Green,et al.  Six-Sigma and the Revival of TQM , 2006 .

[42]  F. Javier Lloréns-Montes,et al.  Six Sigma and management theory: Processes, content and effectiveness , 2006 .

[43]  Håkan Wiklund,et al.  Widening the Six Sigma concept: An approach to improve organizational learning , 2002 .

[44]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  SOCIAL AND METHOD EFFECTS ON LEARNING BEHAVIORS AND KNOWLEDGE CREATION IN SIX SIGMA PROJECTS. , 2004 .

[45]  W. Doll,et al.  The role of project target clarity in an uncertain project environment , 2004 .

[46]  B. Kogut,et al.  Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 2007 .

[47]  Grier C. I. Lin,et al.  A world class new product development best practices model , 2007 .

[48]  B. Byrne.  Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming , 1998 .

[49]  Lynn L.K. Lim,et al.  Examining the linkages between team learning behaviors and team performance , 2003 .

[50]  Peter S. Pande,et al.  Las claves de Seis Sigma: la implantación con éxito de una cultura que revoluciona el mundo empresarial , 2002 .

[51]  Kun-Chang Lee,et al.  Six sigma management activities and their influence on corporate competitiveness , 2006 .

[52]  J. Antony,et al.  Six sigma in small‐ and medium‐sized UK manufacturing enterprises: Some empirical observations , 2005 .

[53]  Dean O. McFarren.  Six Sigma: The Breakthrough Management Strategy Revolutionizing the World's Top Corporations , 2000 .

[54]  David F. Feeny,et al.  Understanding the CEO/CIO Relationship , 1992, MIS Q..

[55]  John Hulland,et al.  Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies , 1999 .

[56]  Dwight D. Frink,et al.  A Review of the Influence of Group Goals on Group Performance , 1994 .

[57]  R. McAdam,et al.  A multilevel case study critique of six sigma: statistical control or strategic change? , 2004 .

[58]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  On The Performance Of Technology-Sourcing Partnerships: The Interaction Between Partner Interdependence And Technology Attributes , 2000 .

[59]  A. Sohal,et al.  The relationship between TQM practices, quality performance, and innovation performance: An empirical examination , 2003 .