Allometry for Sexual Size Dimorphism in Stoneflies Defies the Rensch’s Rule
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. Jehle,et al. Sexual size dimorphism in anurans fails to obey Rensch’s rule , 2013, Frontiers in Zoology.
[2] R. Guillermo‐Ferreira,et al. Territoriality and male-biased sexual size dimorphism in Argia reclusa (Odonata: Zygoptera) , 2012, acta ethologica.
[3] Lucas Silveira Lecci,et al. Taxonomic revision of Gripopteryx (Pictet, 1841) (Plecoptera: Gripopterygidae) , 2011 .
[4] T. Székely,et al. Sexual selection, sexual size dimorphism and Rensch’s rule in Odonata , 2008, Journal of evolutionary biology.
[5] R. Freckleton,et al. Only Half Right: Species with Female-Biased Sexual Size Dimorphism Consistently Break Rensch's Rule , 2007, PloS one.
[6] J. Dale,et al. Sexual selection explains Rensch's rule of allometry for sexual size dimorphism , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[7] W. Blanckenhorn,et al. Sex, Size and Gender Roles , 2007 .
[8] W. Blanckenhorn,et al. Proximate Causes of Rensch’s Rule: Does Sexual Size Dimorphism in Arthropods Result from Sex Differences in Development Time? , 2006, The American Naturalist.
[9] D. Williams,et al. Sexual dimorphism and the influence of artificial elevated temperatures on body size in the imago of Nemoura trispinosa (Plecoptera: Nemouridae) , 2005 .
[10] K. Strimmer,et al. APE: Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution in R language , 2004, Bioinform..
[11] B. Kerans,et al. Body size, sexual size dimorphism, and Rensch's rule in adult hydropsychid caddisflies (Trichoptera: Hydropsychidae) , 2003 .
[12] B. Malmqvist. How does wing length relate to distribution patterns of stoneflies (Plecoptera) and mayflies (Ephemeroptera) , 2000 .
[13] B. Peckarsky,et al. Effects of size at metamorphosis on stonefly fecundity, longevity, and reproductive success , 1998, Oecologia.
[14] D. Fairbairn. Allometry for Sexual Size Dimorphism: Pattern and Process in the Coevolution of Body Size in Males and Females , 1997 .
[15] Daphne J. Fairbairn,et al. A Comparative Analysis of Allometry for Sexual Size Dimorphism: Assessing Rensch's Rule , 1997, The American Naturalist.
[16] B. Peckarsky,et al. Consequences of larval intraspecific competition to stonefly growth and fecundity , 1991, Oecologia.
[17] W. Calder. Size, Function, and Life History , 1988 .
[18] J. Felsenstein. Phylogenies and the Comparative Method , 1985, The American Naturalist.
[19] J. M. Elliott,et al. Hatching time and growth of Nemurellapictetii (Plecoptera: Nemouridae) in the laboratory and a Lake District stream , 1984 .
[20] B. Rensch,et al. Evolution above the species level , 1959 .
[21] R Core Team,et al. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .
[22] Anna Kuchment,et al. Odd couples: Extraordinary differences between the sexes in the animal kingdom. , 2013 .
[23] J. Husak,et al. Sexual selection on locomotor performance , 2008 .
[24] W. Blanckenhorn,et al. Rensch’s rule in insects: patterns among and within species , 2007 .
[25] W. Blanckenhorn,et al. Sex, size, and gender roles : evolutionary studies of sexual size dimorphism , 2007 .
[26] M. Foellmer,et al. Sexual Size Dimorphism in Spiders: Patterns and Processes , 2006 .
[27] B. Peckarsky,et al. CONSEQUENCES AND PLASTICITY OF THE SPECIALIZED PREDATORY BEHAVIOR OF STREAM-DWELLING STONEFLY LARVAE' , 1994 .
[28] J. Lovich,et al. A review of techniques for quantifying sexual size dimorphism. , 1992, Growth, development, and aging : GDA.
[29] F. James Rohlf,et al. Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .