Comparative study on simulation performances of CORSIM and VISSIM for urban street network

Abstract With the progress of simulation technologies, many transportation simulation packages were developed. However, little information is available to the users in applying these models to the most appropriate situations, or even seldom with the simulation accuracy of the individual model. This study conducts a comparative analysis of two popular simulation models (VISSIM and CORSIM), based on their simulation performances on an urban transportation network. Road network and field traffic data from North Bund, Hongkou District, Shanghai, China were used as the simulation background and input. Sensitivity analysis was carried out to compare the performance of both models based on four key indices, namely software usability, average control delay, average queuing length, and cross-sectional traffic volume. Advantages of each simulator were identified based on comparison analyses of simulations with different levels of congestion and intersection geospatial scales. The main performance difference was found lying in the default parameter configuration within the models, including driver behavior settings, traffic environment settings, and vehicle types, etc. Consequently, it was recommended that analysts should choose their appropriate tools based on intersection type and level of saturation within the simulation case.

[1]  Loren Bloomberg,et al.  Comparison of VISSIM and CORSIM Traffic Simulation Models on a Congested Network , 2000 .

[2]  Hussein Dia,et al.  Comparative evaluation of microscopic car-following behavior , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[3]  Alexandra Kondyli,et al.  Modeling Vehicle Interactions during Lane‐Changing Behavior on Arterial Streets , 2010, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[4]  Ilsoo Yun,et al.  Application of Microscopic Simulation Model Calibration and Validation Procedure: Case Study of Coordinated Actuated Signal System , 2006 .

[5]  Alexandra Kondyli,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of CORSIM with respect to the process of freeway flow breakdown at bottleneck locations , 2012, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[6]  Lily Elefteriadou,et al.  Research and Implementation of Lane-Changing Model Based on Driver Behavior , 2010 .

[7]  D. Gazis,et al.  Nonlinear Follow-the-Leader Models of Traffic Flow , 1961 .

[8]  Gordon D. B. Cameron,et al.  PARAMICS—Parallel microscopic simulation of road traffic , 1996, The Journal of Supercomputing.

[9]  Harilaos N. Koutsopoulos,et al.  A microscopic traffic simulator for evaluation of dynamic traffic management systems , 1996 .

[10]  Hao Yang,et al.  Calibration of a Family of Car-Following Models with Retarded Linear Regression Methods , 2011 .

[11]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  General Lane-Changing Model MOBIL for Car-Following Models , 2007 .

[12]  Peter Vortisch,et al.  Microscopic Traffic Flow Simulator VISSIM , 2010 .

[13]  Jens Rørbech.  MULTILANE TRAFFIC FLOW PROCESS: EVALUATION OF QUEUING AND LANE-CHANGING PATTERNS , 1976 .

[14]  Saudi Arabia,et al.  A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CURRENTLY USED MICROSCOPIC AND MACROSCOPIC TRAFFIC SIMULATION SOFTWARE , 2009 .

[15]  Alejandra Medina Flintsch,et al.  Comparison of Car-Following Models when Calibrated to Individual Drivers Using Naturalistic Data , 2011 .

[16]  Jianping Wu,et al.  Lane changing on the motorway: factors affecting its occurrence, and their implications , 1998 .

[17]  G. F. Newell.  Nonlinear Effects in the Dynamics of Car Following , 1961 .

[18]  Jian Sun,et al.  Vehicle actuation based short-term traffic flow prediction model for signalized intersections , 2012 .

[19]  L. A. Pipes.  An Operational Analysis of Traffic Dynamics , 1953 .

[20]  Byungkyu Park,et al.  Microscopic Simulation Model Calibration and Validation: Case Study of VISSIM Simulation Model for a Coordinated Actuated Signal System , 2003 .