The benefit of being a big fish in a big pond: Contrast and assimilation effects on academic self-concept

Abstract This study investigates the effects of class-average ability (intelligence) and class type (gifted vs. regular) on Math academic self-concept. The sample comprised 722 fifth-grade students (376 female) in a setting of full-time ability grouping at the top track of the German secondary high school system. Students came from 34 different classes at five schools; nine of these classes were part of a gifted track (n = 179). Academic self-concept and school grades were assessed by a self-report questionnaire, intelligence by a standardized test. Higher class-average ability led to lower academic self-concepts after controlling for the positive influence of individual ability (contrast effect). Class type had a counterbalancing positive effect on self-concept (assimilation effect). For students in gifted classes, both effects were of comparable size. Thus, no evidence for a big-fish-little-pond effect (stronger contrast than assimilation effect) was found. Effects of individual and group level ability were partially mediated by school grades. Implications for educational practice of highly able students are discussed.

[1]  Joop J. Hox,et al.  Applied Multilevel Analysis. , 1995 .

[2]  Oliver Dickhäuser,et al.  "Letztes Halbjahr stand ich zwei" : Zur Akkuratheit selbst berichteter Noten , 2005 .

[3]  H. Marsh,et al.  Big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. A cross-cultural (26-country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[4]  Herbert W. Marsh,et al.  The Effects of Gifted and Talented Programs on Academic Self-Concept: The Big Fish Strikes Again , 1995 .

[5]  U. Trautwein,et al.  Wenn leistungsstarke Klassenkameraden ein Nachteil sind: Referenzgruppeneffekte bei Übertrittsentscheidungen , 2007 .

[6]  Herbert W. Marsh,et al.  The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept , 1987 .

[7]  Birgit Spinath,et al.  Development of self-perceived ability in elementary school: the role of parents’ perceptions, teacher evaluations, and intelligence , 2005 .

[8]  R. Buehler,et al.  Collective self-esteem as a moderator of the frog-pond effect in reactions to performance feedback. , 1995 .

[9]  K. R. Kelly,et al.  Effects of Academic Achievement and Gender on Academic and Social Self‐Concept: A Replication Study , 1990 .

[10]  Gregory J. Boyle,et al.  Self-Description Questionnaire II. , 1994 .

[11]  Herbert W. Marsh,et al.  Determinants of student self-concept: Is it better to be a relatively large fish in a small pond even if you don't learn to swim as well? , 1984 .

[12]  O. Köller,et al.  Der Einfluß der Leistungsstärke von Schulen auf das fachspezifische Selbstkonzept der Begabung und das Interesse , 2000 .

[13]  D. Mackinnon.  Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis , 2008 .

[14]  Judith Ireson,et al.  Academic self-concepts in adolescence: Relations with achievement and ability grouping in schools , 2009 .

[15]  J. Hattie.  Classroom Composition and Peer Effects. , 2002 .

[16]  T. Goetz,et al.  Big fish in big ponds: A multilevel analysis of test anxiety and achievement in special gifted classes , 2008, Anxiety, stress, and coping.

[17]  Herbert W. Marsh,et al.  Failure of High-Ability High Schools to Deliver Academic Benefits Commensurate With Their Students’ Ability Levels , 1991 .

[18]  Michel Boivin,et al.  Academic Self-Concept and Academic Achievement: Developmental Perspectives on Their Causal Ordering. , 2003 .

[19]  Tim Urdan,et al.  Adolescence and Education , 2002 .

[20]  Ronald G. Stansfield,et al.  Sociological Methodology 1982 , 1983 .

[21]  H. Marsh,et al.  Longitudinal multilevel models of the big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: counterbalancing contrast and reflected-glory effects in Hong Kong schools. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  Mimi Bong,et al.  Between- and Within-Domain Relations of Academic Motivation Among Middle and High School Students: Self-Efficacy, Task-Value, and Achievement Goals , 2001 .

[23]  H. Marsh,et al.  Self-Description Questionnaire III , 2011 .

[24]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Basking in Reflected Glory: Three (Football) Field Studies , 1976 .

[25]  A comparison study of student attitudes and perceptions in homogeneous and heterogeneous classrooms , 1995 .

[26]  Ellen B. Goldring.  Assessing the status of information on classroom organizational frameworks for gifted students. , 1990 .

[27]  Schleyer,et al.  The Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect for Academic Self-Concept, Test Anxiety, and School Grades in Gifted Children. , 1999, Contemporary educational psychology.

[28]  O. Köller,et al.  Eine Überprüfung von Modellen zur Genese akademischer Selbstkonzepte: Ergebnisse aus der PISA-Studie , 2002 .

[29]  Marjorie Seaton.  The big-fish-little-pond effect under the grill : tests of its universality, a search for moderators, and the role of social comparison , 2007 .

[30]  D. Rubin,et al.  Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. , 1989 .

[31]  R. Shavelson,et al.  Self-Concept: Validation of Construct Interpretations , 1976 .

[32]  Sophia Catsambis,et al.  For better or for worse? a nationwide study of the social psychological effects of gender and ability grouping in mathematics , 2001 .

[33]  Dona J. Matthews,et al.  School-Within-a-School Gifted Programs , 2007 .

[34]  U. Trautwein,et al.  Self-esteem, academic self-concept, and achievement: how the learning environment moderates the dynamics of self-concept. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  Olaf Köller,et al.  Zum Zusammenspiel von schulischer Leistung, Selbstkonzept und Interesse in der gymnasialen Oberstufe , 2006 .

[36]  M. Sobel.  Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models , 1982 .

[37]  D. Lohman,et al.  Gifted Today but Not Tomorrow? Longitudinal Changes in Ability and Achievement during Elementary School , 2006 .

[38]  B. Byrne.  Validating the measurement and structure of self-concept: snapshots of past, present, and future research. , 2002, The American psychologist.

[39]  I. Deary,et al.  Intelligence and educational achievement , 2007 .

[40]  T. Goetz,et al.  Female ‘big fish’ swimming against the tide: The ‘big-fish-little-pond effect’ and gender-ratio in special gifted classes , 2008 .

[41]  H. Cooper,et al.  The Relation Between Self-Beliefs and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2004 .

[42]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[43]  Ulrich Trautwein,et al.  Student tracking and the powerful effects of opt-in courses on self-concept: reflected-glory effects do exist after all , 2005 .

[44]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Ability Grouping and Student Achievement in Elementary Schools: A Best-Evidence Synthesis , 1986 .

[45]  H. Marsh,et al.  New frontiers for self research , 2005 .

[46]  H. Marsh,et al.  Earning Its Place as a Pan-Human Theory: Universality of the Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect across 41 Culturally and Economically Diverse Countries. , 2009 .

[47]  Ulrich Trautwein,et al.  Academic self-concept, interest, grades, and standardized test scores: reciprocal effects models of causal ordering. , 2005, Child development.

[48]  Susan A. Murphy,et al.  Monographs on statistics and applied probability , 1990 .

[49]  D. Lohman.  The Role of Nonverbal Ability Tests in Identifying Academically Gifted Students: An Aptitude Perspective , 2005 .

[50]  Patricio Cumsille,et al.  Methods for Handling Missing Data , 2003 .

[51]  Referenzgruppeneffekte im Sportunterricht : Kurz- und langfristig negative Effekte sportlicher Klassenkameraden auf das sportbezogene Selbstkonzept , 2007 .

[52]  Karen B. Rogers,et al.  Lessons Learned About Educating the Gifted and Talented , 2007 .

[53]  F. Preckel,et al.  Grouping the Gifted and Talented: Are Gifted Girls Most Likely to Suffer the Consequences? , 2008 .

[54]  Anne C. Frenzel,et al.  Antecedents of academic emotions: Testing the internal/external frame of reference model for academic enjoyment , 2006 .

[55]  Barbara M. Byrne,et al.  Academic self-concept: Its structure, measurement, and relation to academic achievement. , 1996 .

[56]  D. Mackinnon,et al.  Multilevel Modeling of Individual and Group Level Mediated Effects , 2001, Multivariate behavioral research.

[57]  K. Rogers.  Grouping the Gifted and Talented: Questions and Answers. , 1993 .

[58]  Ulrich Trautwein,et al.  Integration of multidimensional self-concept and core personality constructs: construct validation and relations to well-being and achievement. , 2006, Journal of personality.

[59]  H. Marsh,et al.  The Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect: Persistent Negative Effects of Selective High Schools on Self-Concept After Graduation , 2007 .

[60]  Peter Tymms,et al.  Effect sizes in multilevel models. , 2004 .

[61]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[62]  Pascal Huguet,et al.  Clarifying the role of social comparison in the big-fish-little-pond effect (BFLPE): an integrative study. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[63]  W. Schneider,et al.  Individual development from 3 to 12: Findings from the Munich Longitudinal Study. , 1999 .

[64]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[65]  G. A. Davis,et al.  Handbook of Gifted Education , 1991 .

[66]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[67]  Herbert W. Marsh.  Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect on Academic Self-Concept 1Dieser Beitrag und die darauf bezogenen Stellungnahmen wurden von D.H. Rost akzeptiert. , 2005 .

[68]  J. Oakes,et al.  Keeping Track: How Schools Structure Inequality. , 1986 .

[69]  Petra Stanat,et al.  PISA 2000 : Dokumentation der Erhebungsinstrumente , 2002 .

[70]  H. Marsh,et al.  Gifted, Streamed and Mixed-Ability Programs for Gifted Students: Impact on Self-Concept, Motivation, and Achievement , 2000 .

[71]  J L Schafer,et al.  Multiple Imputation for Multivariate Missing-Data Problems: A Data Analyst's Perspective. , 1998, Multivariate behavioral research.

[72]  E. Skaalvik,et al.  Internal and External Frames of Reference for Academic Self-Concept , 2002 .

[73]  L. Wheeler,et al.  Social Comparison and Self-Evaluations of Competence. , 2005 .

[74]  David Yun Dai,et al.  The Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go from Here? , 2008 .

[75]  Del Siegle,et al.  The structure and function of academic self‐concept in gifted and general education students , 2003 .

[76]  H. Marsh,et al.  Tracking, grading, and student motivation : Using group composition and status to predict self-concept and interest in ninth-grade mathematics , 2006 .

[77]  A. Jensen,et al.  The g factor , 1996, Nature.

[78]  J. Schafer,et al.  Missing data: our view of the state of the art. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[79]  H. Marsh,et al.  The Pivotal Role of Frames of Reference in Academic Self-Concept Formation: The "Big Fish-Little Pond" Effect. , 2002 .

[80]  F. Mönks,et al.  General, social, and academic self-concepts of gifted adolescents , 1992, Journal of youth and adolescence.

[81]  Ulrich Trautwein,et al.  The Big-fish–little-pond-effect Stands Up to Critical Scrutiny: Implications for Theory, Methodology, and Future Research , 2008 .

[82]  Roel Bosker,et al.  Multilevel analysis : an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling , 1999 .

[83]  Karen Elliot,et al.  But what does it mean? The use of effect sizes in educational research , 2004 .