In vitro characterization of electronically stimulated ionic electroactive polymers with application to muscle prosthesis

Towards the development of new classes of subcutaneous muscle prosthesis, this paper presents and discusses results of in vitro characterization of biocompatible ionic electro-active polymers (iEAPs) under different electrical stimulation scenarios. The electrical stimulation is provided via a low-dropout regulator (LDO). The functionality of electrically stimulated iEAPs is evaluated under steady-state and transient conditions. Electrical characteristics of iEAPs in terms of conductance, and movement characteristics of iEAPs in terms of changes in the bending angle during fixed and transient stimulation are evaluated. Measured results suggest that iEAPs in combination with LDO-based stimulator have great potentials for the realization of the next generation muscle prosthesis that are flexible, and can enable immediate movement restoration, upon implantation.

[1]  Kathryn Ziegler-Graham,et al.  Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  Reza Montazami,et al.  Investigation of Spray-Coated Silver-Microparticle Electrodes for Ionic Electroactive Polymer Actuators , 2014 .

[3]  J. Freeman,et al.  Poly(acrylic acid)/poly(vinyl alcohol) compositions coaxially electrospun with poly(ɛ-caprolactone) and multi-walled carbon nanotubes to create nanoactuating scaffolds , 2011 .

[4]  Laleh Najafizadeh,et al.  A coil misalignment compensation concept for wireless power transfer links in biomedical implants , 2015, 2015 IEEE Wireless Power Transfer Conference (WPTC).

[5]  Weiwei Cui,et al.  Bending behaviors of electroresponsive PVA/PAA SIPN hydrogels under electric field , 2011, Proceedings of 2011 6th International Forum on Strategic Technology.

[6]  Laleh Najafizadeh,et al.  A wirelessly tunable low drop-out regulator for subcutaneous muscle prosthesis , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS).

[7]  K. Kim,et al.  Ionic polymer-metal composites: I. Fundamentals , 2001 .

[8]  Joseph W Freeman,et al.  In vivo skeletal muscle biocompatibility of composite, coaxial electrospun, and microfibrous scaffolds. , 2014, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[9]  Laleh Najafizadeh,et al.  A low drop-out regulator for subcutaneous electrical stimulation of nanofibers used in muscle prosthesis , 2015, 2015 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS).

[10]  K. Asaka,et al.  Self-Sensing Ionic Polymer Actuators: A Review , 2015 .

[11]  S. Park,et al.  Characterization of smart hydrogels for biometric sensors and actuators , 2003, IEEE EMBS Asian-Pacific Conference on Biomedical Engineering, 2003..

[12]  J. Freeman,et al.  Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) nanoparticle and poly(ɛ-caprolactone) electrospun scaffold characterization for skeletal muscle regeneration. , 2015, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[13]  Yoseph Bar-Cohen,et al.  Electroactive Polymer (EAP) Actuators as Artificial Muscles: Reality, Potential, and Challenges, Second Edition , 2004 .

[14]  Benjamin Chu,et al.  Myotube assembly on nanofibrous and micropatterned polymers. , 2006, Nano letters.