The estimation of calibration equations for variables with heteroscedastic measurement errors

In clinical chemistry and medical research, there is often a need to calibrate the values obtained from an old or discontinued laboratory procedure to the values obtained from a new or currently used laboratory method. The objective of the calibration study is to identify a transformation that can be used to convert the test values of one laboratory measurement procedure into the values that would be obtained using another measurement procedure. However, in the presence of heteroscedastic measurement error, there is no good statistical method available for estimating the transformation. In this paper, we propose a set of statistical methods for a calibration study when the magnitude of the measurement error is proportional to the underlying true level. The corresponding sample size estimation method for conducting a calibration study is discussed as well. The proposed new method is theoretically justified and evaluated for its finite sample properties via an extensive numerical study. Two examples based on real data are used to illustrate the procedure.

[1]  L. Hansen Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators , 1982 .

[2]  David M Bunk,et al.  Roadmap for harmonization of clinical laboratory measurement procedures. , 2011, Clinical chemistry.

[3]  K. Linnet,et al.  Performance of Deming regression analysis in case of misspecified analytical error ratio in method comparison studies. , 1998, Clinical chemistry.

[4]  J P Buonaccorsi Prediction in the presence of measurement error: general discussion and an example predicting defoliation. , 1995, Biometrics.

[5]  D. Ruppert,et al.  The Use and Misuse of Orthogonal Regression in Linear Errors-in-Variables Models , 1996 .

[6]  Toni M. Whited,et al.  TWO-STEP GMM ESTIMATION OF THE ERRORS-IN-VARIABLES MODEL USING HIGH-ORDER MOMENTS , 2002, Econometric Theory.

[7]  K. Linnet,et al.  Estimation of the linear relationship between the measurements of two methods with proportional errors. , 1990, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  B. Toprak,et al.  Effect of sample type, centrifugation and storage conditions on vitamin D concentration , 2013, Biochemia medica.

[9]  Elizabeth A Yetley,et al.  Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D status of the US population: 1988-1994 compared with 2000-2004. , 2008, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[10]  Yasuo Amemiya,et al.  Prediction When Both Variables are Subject to Error, with Application to Earthquake Magnitudes , 1983 .

[11]  Ramón A Durazo-Arvizu,et al.  Evaluation of Vitamin D Standardization Program protocols for standardizing serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D data: a case study of the program's potential for national nutrition and health surveys. , 2013, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[12]  A. Chesher The effect of measurement error , 1991 .

[13]  M. Drezner,et al.  Assay variation confounds the diagnosis of hypovitaminosis D: a call for standardization. , 2004, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[14]  K. Linnet,et al.  Necessary sample size for method comparison studies based on regression analysis. , 1999, Clinical chemistry.

[15]  Graham D Carter,et al.  Accuracy of 25-hydroxyvitamin D assays: confronting the issues. , 2011, Current drug targets.

[16]  Kurtis Sarafin,et al.  A Comparison of Two Immunoassays for Analysing Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D , 2011 .