Day roost selection in female Bechstein's bats (Myotis bechsteinii): a field experiment to determine the influence of roost temperature

The decision where to live has far-reaching fitness consequences for animals. In contrast to most other mammals or birds that use sheltered nest sites, female Bechstein's bats frequently switch day roosts during one breeding season, and therefore must often decide where to spend the day. Selecting the right roost is important, because roost quality, e.g. microclimatic condition, influences survival and reproduction in bats. Although thermal factors are very important for the quality of roosts occupied by bats, whether bats base their day roost selection directly on roost temperature has not been tested in the field. Over one summer, we examined and tested the roost choice of 21 individually marked female Myotis bechsteinii living in one maternity colony. In a field experiment, we allowed the bats to choose between relatively warm versus cold bat boxes, while controlling for site preferences. We expected females to exhibit a preference for warm roosts during pregnancy and lactation to accelerate gestation and shorten the period of growth of their young. Roost occupancy over 160 census days reflected significant temperature differences among 89 surveyed roosts (14 tree holes and 75 bat boxes), and preferences changed with the season. Females significantly preferred cold roosts before parturition, whereas post-partum, they significantly favoured warm roosts. Temperature preferences were independent of the roost site, and thus roost selection was based directly on temperature. Boxes with significantly different daytime temperatures did not differ significantly at night. Consequently, bats would have to spend at least 1 day in a new roost to test it. Information transfer among colony members might facilitate knowledge of roost availability. Access to many roosts providing different microclimates is likely to be important for successful reproduction in the endangered Bechstein's bat.

[1]  G. Kerth,et al.  Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) reveals that female Bechstein’s bats live in closed societies , 2000, Molecular ecology.

[2]  R. Barclay,et al.  Sex differences in the use of daily torpor and foraging time by big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) during the reproductive season , 2009 .

[3]  A. Oppliger,et al.  Effect of an ectoparasite on lay date, nest-site choice, desertion, and hatching success in the great tit (Pants major) , 1994 .

[4]  J. Rydell Site Fidelity in the Northern Bat (Eptesicus nilssoni) during Pregnancy and Lactation , 1989 .

[5]  S. Lewis Roost Fidelity of Bats: A Review , 1995 .

[6]  D. Webb Microclimate of ground nests: the relative importance of radiative cover and wind breaks for three grassland species , 1993 .

[7]  M. Fenton Science and the Conservation of Bats , 1997 .

[8]  S. Lewis,et al.  Low roost-site fidelity in pallid bats: associated factors and effect on group stability , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[9]  R. Barclay,et al.  Patterns of daily torpor and day-roost selection by male and female big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) , 1994 .

[10]  Paul A. Racey,et al.  Roost selection by the brown long-eared bat Plecotus auritus , 1997 .

[11]  R. Barclay,et al.  Roost-site selection and roosting ecology of forest-dwelling bats in southern British Columbia , 1996 .

[12]  J. Alcock Animal Behavior: An Evolutionary Approach , 1975 .

[13]  J. Speakman,et al.  Roost selection in the pipistrelle bat,Pipistrellus pipistrellus(Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae), in northeast Scotland , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  G. Bartholomew,et al.  The roles of energetics, water economy, foraging behavior, and geothermal refugia in the distribution of the bat,Macrotus californicus , 1986, Journal of Comparative Physiology B.

[15]  Racey Pa Environmental factors affecting the length of gestation in heterothermic bats. , 1973 .

[16]  T. Kunz,et al.  Variation in size at birth and post-natal growth in the insectivorous bat Pipistrellus subflavus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) , 1998 .

[17]  P. Racey,et al.  Variations in gestation length in a colony of pipistrelle bats (Pipistrellus pipistrellus) from year to year. , 1981, Journal of reproduction and fertility.

[18]  D. Hosken Roost selection by the lesser long-eared bat, Nyctophilus geoffroyi, and the greater long-eared bat, N. Major (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) in Banksia woodlands , 1996 .

[19]  J. Speakman,et al.  Energy budgets of lactating and non-reproductive Brown Long-Eared Bats (Plecotus auritus) suggest females use compensation in lactation , 1999 .

[20]  J. Lindström,et al.  Early development and fitness in birds and mammals. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[21]  Gerald S. Wilkinson,et al.  Information transfer at evening bat colonies , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  W. Calder Microhabitat Selection During Nesting of Hummingbirds in the Rocky Mountains , 1973 .

[23]  J. Altringham Bats: Biology and Behaviour , 1996 .

[24]  G. Körtner,et al.  The energetic cost of arousal from torpor in the marsupial Sminthopsis macroura : benefits of summer ambient temperature cycles , 1999, Journal of Comparative Physiology B.

[25]  R. Brigham,et al.  Roosting Behavior and Roost-Site Preferences of Forest-Dwelling California Bats (Myotis californicus) , 1997 .

[26]  P. Racey Environmental factors affecting the length of gestation in heterothermic bats. , 1973, Journal of reproduction and fertility. Supplement.

[27]  Heinz Weigold Jugendentwicklung der Temperaturregulation bei der Mausohrfledermaus,Myotis myotis (Borkhausen, 1797) , 1973, Journal of comparative physiology.

[28]  G. Kerth,et al.  FISSION, FUSION AND NONRANDOM ASSOCIATIONS IN FEMALE BECHSTEIN'S BATS (MYOTIS BECHSTEINII) , 1999 .

[29]  D. Lunney,et al.  Roost selection by the north Queensland long-eared bat Nyctophilus bifax in littoral rainforest in the Iluka World Heritage Area, New South Wales , 1995 .