Hydraulically interconnected vehicle suspension: background and modelling

This paper presents a novel approach for the frequency domain analysis of a vehicle fitted with a general hydraulically interconnected suspension (HIS) system. Ideally, interconnected suspensions have the capability, unique among passive systems, to provide stiffness and damping characteristics dependent on the all-wheel suspension mode in operation. A basic, lumped-mass, four-degree-of-freedom half-car model is used to illustrate the proposed methodology. The mechanical–fluid boundary condition in the double-acting cylinders is modelled as an external force on the mechanical system and a moving boundary on the fluid system. The fluid system itself is modelled using the hydraulic impedance method, in which the relationships between the dynamic fluid states, i.e. pressures and flows, at the extremities of a single fluid circuit are determined by the transfer matrix method. A set of coupled, frequency-dependent equations, which govern the dynamics of the integrated half-car system, are then derived and the application of these equations to both free and forced vibration analysis is explained. The fluid system impedance matrix for the two general wheel-pair interconnection types—anti-synchronous and anti-oppositional—is also given. To further outline the application of the proposed methodology, the paper finishes with an example using a typical anti-roll HIS system. The integrated half-car system's free vibration solutions and frequency response functions are then obtained and discussed in some detail. The presented approach provides a scientific basis for investigating the dynamic characteristics of HIS-equipped vehicles, and the results offer further confirmation that interconnected suspension schemes can provide, at least to some extent, individual control of modal stiffness and damping characteristics.

[1]  John A C Warner RIDING-QUALITIES RESEARCH , 1924 .

[2]  J. J. McElroy AIR-SPRINGS AND THE MEASUREMENT OF RIDING-QUALITY , 1924 .

[3]  O. D. Dillman,et al.  BUILDING STABILITY INTO THE MODERN AUTOMOBILE , 1953 .

[4]  W. Thomson Theory of vibration with applications , 1965 .

[5]  R. E. Goodson,et al.  A Survey of Modeling Techniques for Fluid Line Transients , 1972 .

[6]  J S Stecki,et al.  Fluid Transmission Lines—Distributed Parameter Models Part 2: Comparison of Models , 1986 .

[7]  J S Stecki,et al.  Fluid Transmission Lines—Distributed Parameter Models Part 1: A Review of the State of the Art , 1986 .

[8]  Toshio Oonuma,et al.  Toyota Electronic Modulated Air Suspension for the 1986 SOARER , 1987 .

[9]  D N Johnston,et al.  The Impedance Characteristics of Fluid Power Components: Relief Valves and Accumulators , 1991 .

[10]  D N Johnston,et al.  The Impedance Characteristics of Fluid Power Components: Restrictor and Flow Control Valves , 1991 .

[11]  S. Y. Bhave,et al.  Effect of Connecting the Front and Rear Air Suspensions of a Vehicle on the Transmissibility of Road Undulation Inputs , 1992 .

[12]  T D Gillespie,et al.  Fundamentals of Vehicle Dynamics , 1992 .

[13]  Tetsuya Iijima,et al.  Development of a Hydraulic Active Suspension , 1993 .

[14]  Davorin David Hrovat Applications of Optimal Control to Advanced Automotive Suspension Design , 1993 .

[15]  D. N. Johnston,et al.  A technique for the measurement of the transfer matrix characteristics of two-port hydraulic components , 1994 .

[16]  D N Johnston,et al.  Impedance Characteristics of Hydraulic Orifices , 1995 .

[17]  S. Rakheja,et al.  PROPERTIES OF AN INTERCONNECTED HYDRO-PNEUMATIC SUSPENSION SYSTEM , 1995 .

[18]  Masato Abe,et al.  Modelling Combined Ride and Handling Manœuvres for a Vehicle with Slow-Active Suspension , 1997 .

[19]  Garrick J. Forkenbrock,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL EXAMINATION OF SELECTED MANEUVERS THAT MAY INDUCE ON-ROAD UNTRIPPED, LIGHT VEHICLE ROLLOVER , 2001 .

[20]  Karen Margaret Holford,et al.  Electrohydraulic effects on the modelling of a vehicle active suspension , 2001 .

[21]  Josep Fontdecaba i Buj Integral Suspension System for Motor Vehicles Based on Passive Components , 2002 .

[22]  Garrick J. Forkenbrock,et al.  AN EXPERIMENTAL EXAMINATION OF J-TURN AND FISHHOOK MANEUVERS THAT MAY INDUCE ON-ROAD, UNTRIPPED, LIGHT VEHICLE ROLLOVER. IN: OCCUPANT AND VEHICLE RESPONSES IN ROLLOVERS , 2003 .

[23]  Roger Stanway,et al.  Semi-active vehicle suspension using smart fluid dampers: a modelling and control study , 2003 .

[24]  Nicholas Mace,et al.  Analysis and synthesis of passive interconnected vehicle suspensions , 2004 .

[25]  Carlo Novara,et al.  Experimental modeling of vertical dynamics of vehicles with controlled suspensions , 2004 .

[26]  C. Su,et al.  Comparison of Roll Properties of Hydraulically and Pneumatically Interconnected Suspensions for Heavy Vehicles , 2005 .

[27]  Dennis A. Guenther,et al.  Experimental evaluation of fishhook maneuver performance of a kinetic suspension system , 2005 .

[28]  G. W. Walker,et al.  Interconnected vehicle suspension , 2005 .

[29]  Dennis A. Guenther,et al.  ADAMS Simulation of Ride and Handling Performance of the Kinetic™ Suspension System , 2006 .

[30]  A. Tavner,et al.  Investigation of Damper Valve Dynamics Using Parametric Numerical Methods , 2007 .

[31]  Dongpu Cao,et al.  Pitch plane analysis of a twin-gas-chamber strut suspension , 2008 .