The Craik—O'Brien—Cornsweet Illusion in Colour: Quantitative Characterisation and Comparison with Luminance

The strength of the Craik–O'Brien–Cornsweet illusion was measured for different values of spatial and temporal stimulus parameters, in the traditional achromatic version, and in an isoluminant colour version. It was found that the illusion is much weaker with isoluminant colour stimuli than with achromatic luminance stimuli. The illusion depends on the spatial parameters of the stimulus in a way that yields an approximate scale invariance: The strength of the illusion is similar for different stimulus sizes, as long as the ratio of the width of the transition region around the edge, where luminance or colour change, to the total stimulus width is preserved. In both the achromatic and the chromatic case, the strength of the illusion decreases with increasing presentation time. The similarity of the differences between brightness and colour effects on one hand and the differences in sensitivity for colour and luminance changes in humans on the other suggests that a lack of gradient detection underlies the Craik–O'Brien–Cornsweet illusion.

[1]  E. Land,et al.  Lightness and retinex theory. , 1971, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[2]  D. F. Neri,et al.  The appearance of the Cornsweet illusion: Measures of perceived contrast and evenness of brightness , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  S. Grossberg.  Cortical dynamics of three-dimensional form, color, and brightness perception: I. Monocular theory , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  Colin Ware,et al.  The chromatic cornsweet effect , 1983, Vision Research.

[5]  C. F. Stromeyer,et al.  Colour is what the eye sees best , 1993, Nature.

[6]  D. Ts'o,et al.  The organization of chromatic and spatial interactions in the primate striate cortex , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[7]  F. Kingdom,et al.  A multi-channel approach to brightness coding , 1992, Vision Research.

[8]  A Hurlbert,et al.  Formal connections between lightness algorithms. , 1986, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[9]  E. Land.  Smitty Stevens’ Test of Retinex Theory , 1974 .

[10]  D. Ts'o,et al.  Visual topography in primate V2: multiple representation across functional stripes , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  Joel Pokorny,et al.  Responses to pulses and sinusoids in macaque ganglion cells , 1994, Vision Research.

[12]  O. Mimura.  [Eye movements]. , 1992, Nippon Ganka Gakkai zasshi.

[13]  Heiko Neumann,et al.  A Contrast- and Luminance-driven Multiscale Network Model of Brightness Perception , 1995, Vision Research.

[14]  Vivian O'Brien,et al.  Contour Perception, Illusion and Reality* , 1958 .

[15]  D. Burr.  Implications of the Craik-O'Brien illusion for brightness perception , 1987, Vision Research.

[16]  R Goldstein,et al.  Lightness models, gradient illusions, and curl , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of 1-D and 2-D brightness perception: A unified model of classical and recent phenomena , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  C. J. Keemink,et al.  Luminance gradients and edge effects , 1976, Vision Research.

[19]  L. Arend.  Spatial differential and integral operations in human vision: implications of stabilized retinal image fading. , 1973, Psychological review.

[20]  G. Cole,et al.  Relative contributions of luminance and chromaticity to the Craik—Cornsweet effect , 1993 .