Phenomena of Apparent Lightness Interpreted by the Recognized Visual Space of Illumination

Many experimental results have been reported which demonstrated deviation of the apparent lightness from the calculated lightness based on spectral reflectance, and these have caused debate among researchers as to the models to explain them. The judgement of lightness of objects that we see in the outside world is one of the most important tasks in our daily life. We proposed the recognized visual space of illumination, RVSI, as a three dimensional recognition constructed in the brain for the outside world, and showed that the apparent lightness was determined in relation to the size of the RVSI. In the present paper the concept was applied to various results of lightness experiments such as the White effect and simultaneous contrast, and based on the proposition that an observer first builds a three dimensional RVSI from a two dimensional pattern and the lightness of a test patch was judged in relation to the size of this RVSI, the results were then globally and nicely explained. A new demonstration of a pattern was proposed to give different apparent lightness for patches with the same physical lightness to strengthen the proposition. The importance of distinguishing between a test patch and a surrounding field was emphasized when one does a lightness experiment and interprets the results.

[1]  Aiko Kozaki,et al.  PERCEPTION OF LIGHTNESS AND BRIGHTNESS OF ACHROMATIC SURFACE COLOR AND IMPRESSION OF ILLUMINATION , 1973 .

[2]  L. Arend,et al.  Lightness, brightness, and brightness contrast: 1. Illuminance variation , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  A. Gilchrist Perceived lightness depends on perceived spatial arrangement. , 1977, Science.

[4]  Hiroyuki Shinoda,et al.  Three Dimensionality of the Recognized Visual Space of Illumination Proved by Hidden Illumination , 1998 .

[5]  A. Valberg,et al.  “Colour constancy” in Mondrian patterns: A partial cancellation of physical chromaticity shifts by simultaneous contrast , 1990, Vision Research.

[6]  M. McCourt,et al.  In defence of "lateral inhibition" as the underlying cause of induced brightness phenomena: a reply to Spehar, Gilchrist and Arend. , 1997, Vision research.

[7]  Branka Spehar,et al.  QUALITATIVE BOUNDARIES CRITICAL IN WHITE'S EFFECT AND SQUARE-WAVE BRIGHTNESS INDUCTION: A REPLY TO KINGDOM ET AL. (1997) , 1997 .

[8]  E. G. Heinemann,et al.  Simultaneous brightness induction as a function of inducing and test-field luminances. , 1955, Journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  Y. Mizokami,et al.  Lightness Change as Perceived in Relation to the Size of Recognized Visual Space of Illumination , 1998 .

[10]  M. Ikeda,et al.  Formation of a Recognized Visual Space of Illumination with Increasing Initial Visual Information , 1995 .

[11]  Mitsuo Ikeda,et al.  Interaction between Two Recognized Visual Space of Illumination as a Function of Illuminance of the Observer's Room , 1996 .

[12]  Hiroyuki Shinoda,et al.  Shift of a Test Patch Appearance into the Recognized Visual Space of Illumination , 1997 .

[13]  Mitsuo Ikeda,et al.  Effect of Initial Visual Information on the Recognized Visual Space of Illumination: The Case of Number of Furniture@@@家具の数の場合 , 1996 .

[14]  R. Taya,et al.  Varying the Strength of the Munker—White Effect by Stereoscopic Viewing , 1995, Perception.

[15]  M. White,et al.  A New Effect of Pattern on Perceived Lightness , 1979, Perception.

[16]  A. Gilchrist,et al.  The critical role of relative luminance relations in White's effect and grating induction , 1995, Vision Research.

[17]  L. Arend,et al.  Lightness, brightness, and brightness contrast: 2. Reflectance variation , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.