Spontaneous biases enhance generalisation in the neonate brain

The ability to use sparse evidence to produce adaptive responses in new contexts and to new stimuli (inductive generalisation) is central to biological and artificial intelligence. Young and inexperienced animals require very little evidence to generalise, raising the question of whether the neonate brain is evolutionarily prepared (predisposed) for generalisation. To understand the principles of spontaneous generalisation, we exposed neonate chicks to an artificial social partner of a specific colour, and measured generalisation by comparing responses to novel and familiar stimuli along either the red-yellow or the blue-green colour continuum. Generalisation responses were inconsistent with an unbiased model, showing biases such as asymmetrical generalisation gradients, faster learning for particular colours (red and blue over yellow and green), preferences for unfamiliar stimuli and different time courses in learning. Moreover, the chicks’ generalisation behaviour was consistent with a Bayesian theoretical model that explicitly incorporates predispositions as initial preferences and treats the learning process as an update of spontaneous preferences. These results show that neonate animals are evolutionarily prepared for generalisation, via biases that do not depend on experience, reinforcement or supervision. Biases that facilitate generalisation are tuned to distinctive features that are unusual in the natural environment, such as the red and blue colours. Predispositions facilitate or hinder learning in the inexperienced brain, determining how experience is used to update the likelihood of predictive models. Neonate animals use spontaneous biases to solve the problem of induction.

[1]  Vera Vasas,et al.  Assessing preferences for adult vs juvenile features in young animals: newly-hatched chicks spontaneously approach red and large stimuli , 2023, bioRxiv.

[2]  Vera Vasas,et al.  Newborn chicks prefer stimuli that move against gravity , 2022, bioRxiv.

[3]  Nina Poth Refining the Bayesian Approach to Unifying Generalisation , 2022, Review of Philosophy and Psychology.

[4]  Bastien S. Lemaire,et al.  Sensitive periods for social development: Interactions between predisposed and learned mechanisms , 2021, Cognition.

[5]  M. Chimonyo,et al.  Effect of vegetation density on survival of South African free-ranging indigenous chicken broods , 2020, Tropical Animal Health and Production.

[6]  E. Versace,et al.  Early preference for face-like stimuli in solitary species as revealed by tortoise hatchlings , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Bastien S. Lemaire,et al.  Stability and individual variability of social attachment in imprinting , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[8]  T. Matsushima,et al.  Combined predisposed preferences for colour and biological motion make robust development of social attachment through imprinting , 2019, Animal Cognition.

[9]  Justin N Wood,et al.  Using automation to combat the replication crisis: A case study from controlled-rearing studies of newborn chicks. , 2019, Infant behavior & development.

[10]  Jane X. Wang,et al.  Reinforcement Learning, Fast and Slow , 2019, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Embryonic Exposure to Valproic Acid Affects Social Predispositions for Dynamic Cues of Animate Motion in Newly-Hatched Chicks , 2019, Front. Physiol..

[12]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Cortical route for facelike pattern processing in human newborns , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  A. Kacelnik,et al.  Priors in Animal and Artificial Intelligence: Where Does Learning Begin? , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  Kevin M. Cury,et al.  DeepLabCut: markerless pose estimation of user-defined body parts with deep learning , 2018, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  S. Frank Measurement invariance explains the universal law of generalization for psychological perception , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  F. Simion,et al.  Visual cues of motion that trigger animacy perception at birth: the case of self-propulsion. , 2017, Developmental science.

[17]  M. Nour Surfing Uncertainty: Prediction, Action, and the Embodied Mind. , 2017, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[18]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Spontaneous generalization of abstract multimodal patterns in young domestic chicks , 2017, Animal Cognition.

[19]  L. Regolin,et al.  Spontaneous preference for visual cues of animacy in naïve domestic chicks: The case of speed changes , 2016, Cognition.

[20]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Naïve Chicks Prefer Hollow Objects , 2016, bioRxiv.

[21]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Newborn chicks show inherited variability in early social predispositions for hen-like stimuli , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[22]  Alex Kacelnik,et al.  Ducklings imprint on the relational concept of “same or different” , 2016, Science.

[23]  A. Clark Surfing Uncertainty: Prediction, Action, and the Embodied Mind , 2015 .

[24]  D. Osorio,et al.  Visual contrast and color in rapid learning of novel patterns by chicks , 2013, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[25]  Matthew D. Shawkey,et al.  pavo: an R package for the analysis, visualization and organization of spectral data , 2013 .

[26]  Justin N. Wood Newborn chickens generate invariant object representations at the onset of visual object experience , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Charles Kemp,et al.  How to Grow a Mind: Statistics, Structure, and Abstraction , 2011, Science.

[28]  Peter W. McOwan,et al.  FReD: The Floral Reflectance Database — A Web Portal for Analyses of Flower Colour , 2010, PloS one.

[29]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Probabilistic models of cognition: exploring representations and inductive biases , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  R. Thornhill Nest Defense by Red Jungle Fowl (Gallus gallus spadiceus) Hens: The Roles of Renesting Potential, Parental Experience and Brood Reproductive Value , 2010 .

[31]  L. Regolin,et al.  Faces are special for newly hatched chicks: evidence for inborn domain-specific mechanisms underlying spontaneous preferences for face-like stimuli. , 2009, Developmental science.

[32]  P. K. Biswas,et al.  Survivability and causes of loss of broody-hen chicks on smallholder households in Bangladesh. , 2008, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[33]  F. Simion,et al.  A predisposition for biological motion in the newborn baby , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  D. Osorio,et al.  Colour preferences and colour vision in poultry chicks , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  H. Ohki‐Hamazaki,et al.  Imprinting modulates processing of visual information in the visual wulst of chicks , 2006, BMC Neuroscience.

[36]  G. Harman,et al.  The Problem of Induction , 2006 .

[37]  J. Endler,et al.  Comparing entire colour patterns as birds see them , 2005 .

[38]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Visually Inexperienced Chicks Exhibit Spontaneous Preference for Biological Motion Patterns , 2005, PLoS biology.

[39]  Gabriel Horn,et al.  Pathways of the past: the imprint of memory , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[40]  S. Ghirlanda,et al.  A century of generalization , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[41]  M. Vorobyev,et al.  Accurate memory for colour but not pattern contrast in chicks , 1999, Current Biology.

[42]  Johan J Bolhuis,et al.  Early learning and the development of filial preferences in the chick , 1999, Behavioural Brain Research.

[43]  T. Roper,et al.  Colour preferences of domestic chicks in relation to food and water presentation , 1997 .

[44]  J. Mench,et al.  Colour avoidance in northern bobwhites: effects of age, sex and previous experience , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[45]  M. Zuk,et al.  Endocrine-immune interactions, ornaments and mate choice in red jungle fowl , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Effects of experimental manipulation of male secondary sex characters on female mate preference in red jungle fowl , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[47]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Lateralization of response by chicks to change in a model partner , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[48]  T. Goldsmith Optimization, Constraint, and History in the Evolution of Eyes , 1990, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[49]  G. Horn,et al.  Development of filial preferences in dark-reared chicks , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[50]  R. Shepard,et al.  Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. , 1987, Science.

[51]  G. Horn,et al.  Predispositions and preferences. Effects on imprinting of lesions to the chick brain , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[52]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  Why are distasteful prey not cryptic? , 1980, Nature.

[53]  C. J. Mills,et al.  Effects of imprinting strength on stimulus generalization in chicks (Gallus gallus). , 1974, Behavioral biology.

[54]  P. S. Jackson,et al.  Imprinting and exploration of slight novelty in chicks , 1974, Nature.

[55]  E. Salzen,et al.  Colour preference and imprinting in domestic chicks , 1971 .

[56]  W. Sluckin,et al.  Changing colour preferences of chicks , 1969 .

[57]  P. Bateson THE CHARACTERISTICS AND CONTEXT OF IMPRINTING , 1966, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[58]  F. V. Smith,et al.  Properties of the visual stimuli for the approach response in the domestic chick , 1961 .

[59]  G. Haydu Imprinting. , 1960, Science.

[60]  E. Hess Natural Preferences of Chicks and Ducklings for Objects of Different Colors , 1956 .

[61]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Generalization , Similarity , and Bayesian Inference , 2000 .

[62]  Peter M. Vishton,et al.  Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. , 1999, Science.

[63]  B. Wechsler,et al.  A comparison of the behaviour of domestic chicks reared with or without a hen in enriched pens , 1998 .

[64]  Ellen M. Markman,et al.  Categorization and Naming in Children: Problems of Induction , 1989 .

[65]  D. Sherry PARENTAL CARE AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF THERMOREGULATION IN RED JUNGLEFOWL , 1981 .

[66]  J. Kovach Effectiveness of Different Colors in the Elicitation and Development of Approach Behavior in Chicks , 1971 .

[67]  E. Salzen,et al.  Self-perception and species recognition in birds. , 1968, Behaviour.

[68]  T. Smith,et al.  Preference of chicks in the original stimulus situation of imprinting , 1965 .