Learning and Doing in Communities: Understanding Knowledge Management through the Lens of Activity Theory

In businesses, government departments and educational institutions, most innovative knowledge creation is achieved, not at the organisational or individual level, but in communities of people who have come together with a common interest. This paper describes a sequence of cases from a research project on the development of socio-technical systems, which support geographically dispersed communities, demonstrating that such communities are viable for both practice and learning, within and between organisations. The Cultural Historical Activity Theory concept of activity is used as the unit of analysis to explain what individuals or small groups of people do in a variety of contexts when supported by socio-technical systems in a flexible, multifaceted model of learning through practice in communities.

[1]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  P ERSPECTIVE M AKING AND P ERSPECTIVE T AKING IN C OMMUNITIES OF K NOWING , 2000 .

[2]  David S Alberts,et al.  Network Centric Warfare: Developing and Leveraging Information Superiority , 1999 .

[3]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[4]  Stephen Toulmin.  Perspectives on activity theory: Knowledge as shared procedures , 1999 .

[5]  F. Blackler.  KNOWLEDGE AND THE THEORY OF ORGANIZATIONS: ORGANIZATIONS AS ACTIVITY SYSTEMS AND THE REFRAMING OF MANAGEMENT* , 1993 .

[6]  Jaakko Virkkunen,et al.  Organisational memory and learning network organisation: the case of Finnish labour protection inspectors , 1995, Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[7]  Cynthia F. Kurtz,et al.  The new dynamics of strategy: sense-making in a complex and complicated world , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[8]  Helen Hasan.  Integrating IS and HCI Using Activity Theory as a Philosophical and Theoretical Basis , 1999, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[9]  I. Nonaka,et al.  BUILDING A FOUNDATION FOR KNOWLEDGE CREATION , 1998 .

[10]  Leoni Warne,et al.  Making the Invisible Visible: modelling social learning in a knowledge management context , 2001, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Thomas N. Garavan,et al.  Creating Intellectual Capital: A Habermasian Community of Practice (Cop) Introduction , 2003 .

[12]  M. Grant,et al.  Communities of practice. , 2020, Health progress.

[13]  C. Kurtz,et al.  The New Dynamics of Strategy sensemaking in a complex-complicated world , 2004 .

[14]  V. Kaptelinin.  Activity theory: implications for human-computer interaction , 1995 .

[15]  Jaakko Virkkunen,et al.  Understanding organizational learning by focusing on “activity systems” , 2000 .

[16]  J. Whitehead,et al.  Action research in organisations , 2000 .

[17]  Helen Hasan,et al.  Support for the sense-making activity of managers , 2001, Decis. Support Syst..

[18]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[19]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Perspectives on activity theory: Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice , 1999 .

[20]  Helen Hasan,et al.  A Multifaceted Approach to Distributed Communities of Learning and Practice , 2003 .