论文信息 - Implementation of crisis resolution/home treatment teams in England: national survey 2005–2006 †

Implementation of crisis resolution/home treatment teams in England: national survey 2005–2006 †

Aims and Method To describe implementation of crisis resolution/home treatment (CRHT) teams in England, examine obstacles to implementation and priorities for development. We conducted an online survey followed by a telephone or face-to-face interview among 243 teams. Results Considerable progress has been made in implementation with a subset of teams demonstrating strong fidelity to the Department of Health's guidance, particularly in urban settings. However, only 40% of teams described themselves as fully established. Many teams reported a high assessment load, understaffing, limited multidisciplinary input and patchy fulfilment of their gate-keeping role. Clinical Implications Successful implementation of the CRHT teams as alternatives to hospital admission requires resources for home treatment out of hours, effective systems working among local services, stronger local understanding and advocacy of the teams' role.

[1] J. Dixon,et al. The NHS plan , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2] J. Phillips,et al. Comparison of community based service with hospital based service for people with acute, severe psychiatric illness. , 1993, BMJ.

[3] G. Glover,et al. Crisis resolution/home treatment teams and psychiatric admission rates in England. , 2006, The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science.

[4] G. Thornicroft,et al. Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment in Mental Health: Frontmatter , 2008 .

[5] K. Linde,et al. Crisis resolution/home treatment teams, gate-keeping and the role of the consultant psychiatrist , 2008 .

[6] I. White,et al. Outcomes of crises before and after introduction of a crisis resolution team. , 2005, The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science.