Transient interference with staphylococcal quorum sensing blocks abscess formation.

The staphylococcal virulon is controlled largely by the agr locus, a global accessory gene regulator that is autoinduced by a self-coded peptide (AIP) and is therefore a quorum sensor. The agr locus has diverged within and between species, giving rise to AIP variants that inhibit heterologous agr activation, an effect with therapeutic potential against Staphylococcus aureus: a single dose of an inhibitory AIP blocks the formation of an experimental murine abscess. As the AIP is unstable at physiological pH, owing to its essential thiolactone bond, its single-dose efficacy seems paradoxical, which has led us to analyze the in vivo kinetics of agr activation and the consequences of its blockage by a heterologous AIP. Initially, the infecting bacteria grow rapidly, achieving sufficient population density within the first 3 h to activate agr, and then enter a neutrophil-induced metabolic eclipse lasting for 2-3 d, followed by agr reactivation concomitantly with the development of the abscess. The inhibitory AIP prevents agr expression only during its short in vivo lifetime, suggesting that the agr-induced and therefore quorum-dependent synthesis of virulence factors shortly after infection is necessary for the subsequent development of the abscess lesion and bacterial survival. We confirm this finding by showing that a sterile agr+ supernatant causes a sterile abscess similar to the septic abscess caused by live bacteria. These results may provide a biological rationale for regulation of virulence factor expression by quorum sensing rather than by response to specific host signals.

[1]  R. Novick Genetic systems in staphylococci. , 1991, Methods in enzymology.

[2]  J. Musser,et al.  Murine model of cutaneous infection with gram-positive cocci , 1992, Infection and immunity.

[3]  J. Kornblum,et al.  Synthesis of staphylococcal virulence factors is controlled by a regulatory RNA molecule. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[4]  T. Muir,et al.  Hydrophobic interactions drive ligand-receptor recognition for activation and inhibition of staphylococcal quorum sensing. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  M. Smeltzer,et al.  Role of the accessory gene regulator (agr) in pathogenesis of staphylococcal osteomyelitis , 1995, Infection and immunity.

[6]  C. W. Ford,et al.  Establishment of an experimental model of a Staphylococcus aureus abscess in mice by use of dextran and gelatin microcarriers. , 1989, Journal of medical microbiology.

[7]  A L Cheung,et al.  Diminished virulence of a sar-/agr- mutant of Staphylococcus aureus in the rabbit model of endocarditis. , 1994, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[8]  W. Peetermans,et al.  Metabolic Activity of Staphylococcus epidermidis Is High during Initial and Low during Late Experimental Foreign-Body Infection , 2004, Journal of bacteriology.

[9]  L. Gray,et al.  Transmembrane Topology of AgrB, the Protein Involved in the Post-translational Modification of AgrD in Staphylococcus aureus * , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  R. Beavis,et al.  Bacterial interference caused by autoinducing peptide variants. , 1997, Science.

[11]  K. Schulze-Osthoff,et al.  Staphylococcus aureusα‐toxin induces apoptosis in peripheral blood mononuclear cells: role of endogenous tumour necrosis factor‐α and the mitochondrial death pathway , 2003, Cellular microbiology.

[12]  D. Bamberger,et al.  Effects of Neutrophils on Cefazolin Activity and Penicillin-Binding Proteins in Staphylococcus aureus Abscesses , 2002, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[13]  J. Parker THE PRODUCTION OF AN EXOTOXIN BY CERTAIN STRAINS OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS , 1924, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[14]  R. Beavis,et al.  Cell density control of staphylococcal virulence mediated by an octapeptide pheromone. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  F. Vandenesch,et al.  Theagr P2 operon: An autocatalytic sensory transduction system inStaphylococcus aureus , 1995, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[16]  C. Wolz,et al.  Direct Quantitative Transcript Analysis of theagr Regulon of Staphylococcus aureus during Human Infection in Comparison to the Expression Profile In Vitro , 2000, Infection and Immunity.

[17]  T. Muir,et al.  Activation and Inhibition of the Staphylococcal AGR System , 2000 .

[18]  T. Muir,et al.  Structure-activity analysis of synthetic autoinducing thiolactone peptides from Staphylococcus aureus responsible for virulence. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  J. Mullins,et al.  Photonic detection of bacterial pathogens in living hosts , 1995, Molecular microbiology.

[20]  A. Tarkowski,et al.  The accessory gene regulator (agr) controls Staphylococcus aureus virulence in a murine arthritis model , 1993, Infection and immunity.

[21]  M. O'Reilly,et al.  The toxic shock syndrome exotoxin structural gene is not detectably transmitted by a prophage , 1983, Nature.

[22]  R. Novick Staphylococcal penicillinase and the new penicillins. , 1962, The Biochemical journal.

[23]  F. Vandenesch,et al.  High Genetic Variability of the agr Locus in Staphylococcus Species , 2002, Journal of bacteriology.

[24]  P. Schlievert,et al.  Nonpurulent response to toxic shock syndrome toxin 1-producing Staphylococcus aureus. Relationship to toxin-stimulated production of tumor necrosis factor. , 1988, Journal of immunology.

[25]  C. Wolz,et al.  Impact of the regulatory loci agr, sarA and sae of Staphylococcus aureus on the induction of α‐toxin during device‐related infection resolved by direct quantitative transcript analysis , 2001, Molecular microbiology.

[26]  R. Novick,et al.  The gene for toxic shock toxin is carried by a family of mobile pathogenicity islands in Staphylococcus aureus , 1998, Molecular microbiology.

[27]  T. Muir,et al.  Rational design of a global inhibitor of the virulence response in Staphylococcus aureus, based in part on localization of the site of inhibition to the receptor-histidine kinase, AgrC. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  M. Hentzer,et al.  Pharmacological inhibition of quorum sensing for the treatment of chronic bacterial infections. , 2003, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[29]  B. Wilson,et al.  Survival of Staphylococcus aureus Inside Neutrophils Contributes to Infection1 , 2000, The Journal of Immunology.

[30]  F. Vandenesch,et al.  A temporal signal, independent of agr, is required for hla but not spa transcription in Staphylococcus aureus , 1991, Journal of bacteriology.

[31]  T. Muir,et al.  Exfoliatin-Producing Strains Define a Fourthagr Specificity Group in Staphylococcus aureus , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[32]  R. Novick Autoinduction and signal transduction in the regulation of staphylococcal virulence , 2003, Molecular microbiology.

[33]  A. Lusis,et al.  Inactivation of a bacterial virulence pheromone by phagocyte-derived oxidants: new role for the NADPH oxidase in host defense. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  P. Schlievert,et al.  Nosocomial transmission of a strain of Staphylococcus aureus causing toxic shock syndrome. , 1986, Annals of internal medicine.

[35]  R. Novick Penicillinase plasmids of Staphylococcus aureus. , 1967, Federation proceedings.

[36]  T. Muir,et al.  Key determinants of receptor activation in the agr autoinducing peptides of Staphylococcus aureus. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[37]  R. Zagursky,et al.  Transcription Profiling-Based Identification ofStaphylococcus aureus Genes Regulated by the agrand/or sarA Loci , 2001, Journal of bacteriology.

[38]  R. Proctor,et al.  Staphylococcus aureus small colony variants are induced by the endothelial cell intracellular milieu. , 1996, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[39]  A. Cheung,et al.  Molecular Interactions between Two Global Regulators,sar and agr, in Staphylococcus aureus * , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[40]  P. Kenny,et al.  Bacterial killing in vitro by abscess-derived neutrophils. , 1991, Journal of medical microbiology.

[41]  V. Kapur,et al.  Repression of the Staphylococcus aureus Accessory Gene Regulator in Serum and In Vivo , 2002, Journal of bacteriology.

[42]  J. Musser,et al.  Virulence gene expression in vivo. , 2004, Current opinion in microbiology.

[43]  M. O'Reilly,et al.  Regulation of exoprotein gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus by agr , 2004, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[44]  T. Muir,et al.  Reversible and Specific Extracellular Antagonism of Receptor-Histidine Kinase Signaling* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[45]  S. Schenk,et al.  Improved method for electroporation of Staphylococcus aureus , 1992 .

[46]  A. Manna,et al.  SarA level is a determinant of agr activation in Staphylococcus aureus , 1998, Molecular microbiology.

[47]  M. Gilmore,et al.  Accessory gene regulator controls Staphylococcus aureus virulence in endophthalmitis. , 1995, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[48]  S. Foster,et al.  The Staphylococcus aureus Alternative Sigma Factor ςB Controls the Environmental Stress Response but Not Starvation Survival or Pathogenicity in a Mouse Abscess Model , 1998 .

[49]  A. Tarkowski,et al.  Role of Neutrophil Leukocytes in Cutaneous Infection Caused by Staphylococcus aureus , 2000, Infection and Immunity.

[50]  Kevin P. Francis,et al.  Monitoring Bioluminescent Staphylococcus aureusInfections in Living Mice Using a Novel luxABCDEConstruct , 2000, Infection and Immunity.

[51]  R. Novick,et al.  Global repression of exotoxin synthesis by staphylococcal superantigens , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.